Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tasn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
541.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
As said in a sibling comment, we currently use public-key encryption and verifying keys. However, we plan on adding support for SPAKE2+ (like e.g. Magic wormhole) among other methods, to make it even easier! See the relevant section of the
542.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Thanks! As for userbase: I think our and their scopes are very different. They are more of an easy way to store data that happens to use some encryption, not a comprehensive end-to-end encryption toolkit. They don't do sharing, integri
543.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Everything is encrypted. We are working on a full spec, it's not yet complete, but some of it is already there: https://docs.etebase.com/protocol-specs/introduction We hope to get all of it done in the few days. F
544.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Thanks a lot! Things have indeed changed, and I feel like the public is really starting to understand the dangers with having their data exposed. I've been running EteSync for years now, and it's still growing. I'd love to ha
545.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
We are working on providing a formal spec, but the gist of it is already documented here: https://docs.etebase.com/protocol-specs/authentication A secure encryption key is derived from the user's password using a
546.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
This is a great question, and the answer is a resounding yes! The API is already powerful, and powers real applications, but it's quite raw. We plan on gradually building all of the above and more. We just first needed a solid base to
547.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
There are docs here: https://docs.etebase.com/ Though they mostly focus on how to use rather than how it works (though we are making progress on that section). As for your specific question: we currently don't solve th
548.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Thanks! :)
549.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Hard to know exactly as people get it from multiple sources, but there are a few hundred thousands downloads on Dockerhub, people run it from source, and it's packaged for OpenWrt, Arch (AUR), Fedora (COPR) and a few other Linux distri
550.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Thanks. :) As said in the other comment, our mission is to encrypt everything, and this is the next step towards that! It's actually something that we've been planning since forever, but it's so nice to finally have it out!
551.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Excited to finally post it on HN. It's something I've been working on for the last year, though in a sense, for much longer! Etebase is an open-source SDK and backend-as-a-service for building end-to-end encrypted applications. Th
552.
▲
Show HN: Etebase – An open source and end-to-end encrypted Firebase alternative
(etebase.com)
308 points
by
tasn
6y ago
|
80 comments
553.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
They don't have end-to-end encryption for their contacts, calendars, tasks and notes, which is what EteSync does... Anyhow, I changed the title. Regarding the comment you were replying to: the NextCloud clients, for all I know, don
554.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
For me NextCloud is all about it's PIM capabilities and having contacts, calendars, tasks and notes as a DAV server. Also, their files support is pretty poor, no? Only a web view, no "dropbox"-like clients. Anyhow, we plan on
555.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Hi everyone, My name is Tom, and I'm the lead developer of EteSync. EteSync is an open-source, end-to-end encrypted, and privacy respecting sync for your contacts, calendars, tasks and notes. You can think of it as sort of an end-to-en
556.
▲
Show HN: EteSync – End-to-end encrypted sync for contacts, calendars, and more
(etesync.com)
10 points
by
tasn
6y ago
|
8 comments
557.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Thanks for the feedback, and these are all fair concerns. Some points that would hopefully alleviate some of them: 1. We have been running EteSync for >3.5 years and have been in the space for much longer, so I'm not just some rando
558.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
Haha. :P Please let me know (email: tom @ the domain) if you have any questions or feedback! Though I'd love to hear what you are working on anyway (I love hearing about new privacy projects!) so would be great to chat regardless.
559.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
No worries, you don't sound dismissive, though let me address your points: First of all, Etebase is not "a whole SaaS", since it's open-source you can self host it, so the SaaS is optional. As for what the GP was asking,
560.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
I couldn't agree more, and it's actually something I've been working on for the last few months, though in a sense for the last few years. I was going to do a Show HN in the next few weeks, but heck, may as well mention it no
561.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
IANAL but I asked FSF (Europe) about it and they said GPLv3 in the app store is fine.
562.
▲
by
tasn
6y ago
I absolutely love Tasks.org especially since it now supports end-to-end encryption using EteSync (which I created)! Glad to see it getting love here!
563.
▲
by
tasn
7y ago
Yeah, it does. You just need to manually verify each member you add to make sure they are trusted (or alternatively just YOLO).
564.
▲
by
tasn
7y ago
I also wish all of my data was version controlled, which is why when I created EteSync[1] I made sure to include a full change history. Check it out, I think it's exactly what you're looking for, and it's fully open source, s
565.
▲
by
tasn
7y ago
Years ago, when it was first created, the code was forked from davdroid, though it diverged quite a bit because the other than the part that interacts with the Android system, they are quite different.
566.
▲
by
tasn
7y ago
EteSync[1] has been around for a few years now. It's fully open source and offers secure, end-to-end encrypted, and privacy respecting sync for your contacts, calendars and tasks. Sounds like what you're looking for... [1]: https
567.
▲
by
tasn
7y ago
I created EteSync a few years ago to securely sync my contacts, calendars and tasks. You can use the hosted solution or self host. It doesn't work on iOS yet, but it's coming very soon: https://blog.etesync.com/nln
568.
▲
Metadata Is Data
(blog.etesync.com)
2 points
by
tasn
7y ago
|
0 comments
569.
▲
by
tasn
7y ago
While self-hosting is a good start, I believe that everyone should be end-to-end encrypting their data. Servers can be hacked and snooped on, and I cringe at the thought of leaving my personal information in the clear on a server, even if i
570.
▲
by
tasn
8y ago
I think the term source-available is more commonly used. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source-available_software
More ›