tapirl

16 ms·

181.
by tapirl 3y ago
Some RSS clients just ignore the hints.
182.
by tapirl 3y ago
So will they maintain a stable C API to skia? It is long-time known pain point that the skia official doesn't provide a usable C API.
183.
by tapirl 3y ago
The main problem with RSS is there might be a large quantity of (useless) traffic produced by subscribers to a personal website which is update with a low frequency. There were some services to fix this problem, but most of them have all be
184.
by tapirl 3y ago
Great resource. It is just ironic that the collapsed content of each item needs JS to be expanded and the collapsed content just contains a link to a new page. The collapse is needless at all. Even it is needed, it is easily to expand it wi
185.
by tapirl 3y ago
It will try to do this, but certainly unable to do this for all cases, such as func foo(constFunc func(*[100000]int)) { for a, i := [100000]int{}, 0; i < len(a); i++ { constFunc(&a) } } in which, the big
186.
by tapirl 3y ago
Invite doesn't always guarantee insightful comments.
187.
by tapirl 3y ago
I believe the author doesn't mean it is a bug in the general sense. The author just means it is a shortcoming, and this shortcoming is surely fixable. The author provides a solution, but I think the zig way is better: for _, *pla
188.
by tapirl 3y ago
The author didn't say it is a bug. The author just says this is a shortcoming of Go.
189.
by tapirl 3y ago
Yes, Zig is friendly to C/C++ programmers. This is a big advantage of Zig.
190.
by tapirl 3y ago
That's not a good analogy. Zig shares much blood with C, but Rust doesn't share much blood with C++. Though, from the complexity view, Rust can be viewed as another C++ (or C+++).
191.
by tapirl 3y ago
What is the better decision to avoid name colliding?
192.
by tapirl 3y ago
> All the revenue from the platform does not even cover 10% of the cheapest Mac Mini. And then there’s the $100 per year developer membership fee for notarization Same experience for my iOS games. Apple should more friendly for sole indi
193.
by tapirl 3y ago
A lots: https://twitter.com/go100and1/status/1690412229135601664 https://twitter.com/go100and1/status/1690587305806057472 https://twitter.com/go100and1/status/1
194.
by tapirl 3y ago
Your logic is too illogical. It is the proposal's supporters' responsibility to prove the proposal doesn't do harm. If they are unable to do this, please don't pretend that this has been proven, and please just stop maki
195.
by tapirl 3y ago
If it is impossible, why do you ask me that question? I totally disagree with your logic. I think you don't have the right logic here. At least, the proposal should be accepted when the experiment period has lasted for a year. But now,
196.
by tapirl 3y ago
As far as I know, no one has proved that it doesn't change behavior in any scenario that matters, including the proposal makers. Have you proved it?
197.
by tapirl 3y ago
Go development is becoming more and more KPI driven.
198.
by tapirl 3y ago
It is confusing that why such a question was asked. It shows the asker lacks of basic logical ability.
199.
by tapirl 3y ago
why do you ask such a confusing question?
200.
by tapirl 3y ago
For `for-range` loops, it looks the benefits of this change are more than the drawbacks. For `for ...; ...; ...` loops, personally, I think the conclusion is the inverse. One breaking case: func main() { defer println() for
201.
by tapirl 3y ago
C# only did this on `foreach` loops, not on traditional `for` loops. Go plans to do this on both (`for-range` loops and traditional `for` loops).
202.
by tapirl 3y ago
For me, Twitter has died. Because Twitter has refused to present the login page for me for several weeks. Tried several browsers, including the latest ones.
203.
Golds – a godoc alternative which lists all type implementation relations(go101.org)
2 points by tapirl 3y ago|0 comments
204.
by tapirl 3y ago
Your logic is so weird. Done here. :)
205.
by tapirl 3y ago
This is not a problem about frequency. This is a problem about possible or not. Language design is a serious thing.
206.
by tapirl 3y ago
:)
207.
by tapirl 3y ago
They are just demonstration code. The alike code in production certainly is different.
208.
by tapirl 3y ago
I have the same feeling as you. Go indeed has for v := range vs {} But unfortunately here v means element index.
209.
by tapirl 3y ago
see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35912510
210.
by tapirl 3y ago
One surprise is that the following loop will print false (now it prints true). for i, p := 0, (*int)(nil); p == nil; print(p == &i) { p = &i } Another surprise is that the value a in the following loop will be d

More ›