tapirl

30 ms·

391.
by tapirl 6y ago
This not true for new companies, for example, Dropbox and Uber.
392.
by tapirl 6y ago
The two don't belong to "cloud infrastructure".
393.
by tapirl 7y ago
A combined influence result of ancient Chinese writing style and Arabic?
394.
by tapirl 7y ago
It means the following program will happily exit now. package main import ( "time" "runtime" ) func main(){ for i := runtime.NumCPU(); i > 0; i-- { go func() { for {} }(
395.
by tapirl 7y ago
> ... using angle brackets, but we couldn’t figure out how to make that work in Go… Because Go has the ability that you can parse the syntax without knowing the types of the names ... This is not the first time I heard that keeping the p
396.
by tapirl 7y ago
because the k8s project is full of generated code, which really hurts the readability.
397.
Go compiler 1.14 eliminates greedy goroutines(twitter.com)
2 points by tapirl 7y ago|0 comments
398.
by tapirl 7y ago
Variables means modifiable. Using variables as final values is bad. This is so simple that no explanations are needed.
399.
by tapirl 7y ago
I do this to adapt it, to make code more secure and serious. I embrace other features in Go but not this one. This one makes Go some like a non-serious language.
400.
by tapirl 7y ago
Specifically, generics and immutable values. Lacking of generics lead to much repetitive code. I don't like using exported variables as final values, so I need to use functions to return the final values, which is verbose and not elega
401.
by tapirl 7y ago
Several years ago, I very don't like the way and the pace C++ introduces new features. But now the way and pace has become normal, I change my mind some. I think it is the time I should re-use C++ for some projects. It would be some re
402.
A Go 1 compatible final value proposal(github.com)
7 points by tapirl 7y ago|0 comments
403.
The benefits of supporting immutable and read only values in Go(github.com)
1 points by tapirl 7y ago|0 comments
404.
by tapirl 7y ago
Is it possible to create an index which only cares the top N items on a column?
405.
by tapirl 7y ago
Glad to know Python also does it well, but the wiki page doesn't mention python at all. ;) > without using other languages as a foil/invoking the Blub paradox That page just shows some facts. The said language really behave as
406.
Small design details I like in Go(github.com)
1 points by tapirl 7y ago|3 comments
407.
by tapirl 7y ago
Science may rule out god, but not religion, for each religion is management and psychology science to avoid disorder and chaos.
408.
by tapirl 7y ago
Would counterfeiting a default fake personal account be a better choice?
409.
by tapirl 7y ago
The article mentions why choosing Go over Kotlin is memory consumption.
410.
by tapirl 7y ago
AT least, it is more exciting for a developer to migrate from Python 2 to Go than to Python 3. :D
411.
by tapirl 7y ago
That is just a small detail example. I'm surprised that no other popular languages do the same as Go. In fact, Go is really more flexible than many dynamic languages in several aspects.
412.
The main sell point of Go is not simplicity, but overall balance and flexibility(github.com)
29 points by tapirl 7y ago|51 comments
413.
by tapirl 7y ago
Should the "ci_job_status" in the line be "ci_jobs" instead? INSERT INTO ci_job_status(repositor ... BTW, it looks Go becomes so popular that many tutorials are using Go for examples. ;D
414.
by tapirl 7y ago
It is also more expensive for very small companies and individual developers. You need pay extra for inbound/outbound traffic and any persistent disk space to cloud providers, whereas these are all included in the plans provided by mos
415.
by tapirl 7y ago
Copy Slices and Maps at Boundaries: https://github.com/uber-go/guide/blob/master/style.md#copy-s... The suggested good clone is not very efficient: https://github.com/go101/go101&#x2
416.
by tapirl 7y ago
There are some situations buffered channels are required: https://go101.org/article/channel-use-cases.html
417.
by tapirl 7y ago
It is a real need sometimes (many times in fact) in programming. This is one of reasons why Go is so flexible. You can't have the best of both worlds. You win some and lose some. Rust avoids this but loses flexibility.
418.
by tapirl 7y ago
Ah, looks both have their own rationality. ":" is ok for single-value returns. AS3 also uses ":". The Haskell language looks interesting. Maybe I should spend some time to study it.
419.
by tapirl 7y ago
Some reasonable, but I see a new inconsistency here. Shouldn't fn foo(fn (int) -> string) be more consistent?
420.
by tapirl 7y ago
IMHO, "fn add(a: int, b: int): int" is far more consistent than "fn add(a: int, b: int) -> int". At least it is self consistent.

More ›