tapas73

8 ms·

31.
by tapas73 5y ago
> this is the very point of having these charges. They relieve congestion Yes. >> ensuring the only people using it are the people who want it really badly Not necessarily. People using it could just have more money.
32.
by tapas73 5y ago
> This sounds increasingly like security theater. It does help. Quite a bit. Each layer (e.g. firewall rules that require that all internet access go through a proxy), adds non-trivial amount of work for the hacker to get anything useful
33.
by tapas73 5y ago
reasons are: 1. no need for coordination in distributed system, no need to check what is the next available id. 2. if userid is visible to users, sequential userid gives away information about the amount of users and allows guessing other v
34.
by tapas73 5y ago
there is new uuid versions (draft) that solves the locality problem: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peabody-dispatch... (one of the new ones, cant remember which exactly)
35.
by tapas73 5y ago
but if mistake is made, and you wrote down L instead of 1, and sent me in a e-mail. I, knowing that it is crockford 32, would easily deduce what mistake was made.
36.
by tapas73 5y ago
could it be just inflation. I heard that there was a lot of moneys being printed.
37.
by tapas73 5y ago
It enforces foreign keys during select. One can say that it makes you explicitly state, which foreign key do you use. "on a.foo = b.bar" can be a incomplete and/or incorrect join condition.
38.
by tapas73 5y ago
I would argue that conceptually it's not too different from needing to know what tables/columns exist in datamodel. I get that it is not common now to care about FKs when writing selects. But it could be. Tooling can be improved t
39.
by tapas73 5y ago
First, very valid concern regarding table name. > Other than saving some typing, I would like to point out the corectness aspect of the proposal. Today foreign keys are enforced during inserts, updates, deletes. (you just can't viol
40.
by tapas73 5y ago
I will write a letter to santa asking to get this into sql. During 10 years in data warehouse I constantly wondered why SQL does not have something like that. Reducing verboseness is nice, but the main perk is the correctness . Oh.. if I g
41.
by tapas73 5y ago
Lets have disabled FK then. postgre, seems to not have it, but the proposal could include also "disabled FK" part. teradata, oracle, sql server already have option for FK "disable/no check". https://docs.
42.
by tapas73 5y ago
I am sad that compilation speed is not on the list.
43.
by tapas73 5y ago
please dont interfere with browser hotkeys
44.
by tapas73 5y ago
Deterance, is also (kind of) defensive purpose.
45.
by tapas73 5y ago
Is there some story about it?
46.
by tapas73 5y ago
back button does not work. Bad site. No treat for you.
47.
by tapas73 5y ago
regading conciousness being an illusion. Does it not imply a spectator? (illusion has to trick somebody)
48.
by tapas73 5y ago
are you referencing to virtual particles? If so, are those real or just mathematical device used for quantum calculations?
49.
by tapas73 5y ago
Also when parents and grandparents join, kids start to leave.
50.
by tapas73 5y ago
There is more than one way to avoid taxes. (hollywood accounting)
51.
by tapas73 5y ago
My take on this: 1. Societal issues. Microsoft wanted Java they could control and change. C# it is then. Google is moving away from java to kotlin, because of disagreements with Oracle. 2. Wish of different trade offs. fast-to-learn vs feat
52.
by tapas73 5y ago
> Atheists do good because it's the right thing to do. Or is remnant from religious generation? (parents programm kids that doing good is right thing to do because God says so. Certain generation starts omitting "God says so&qu
53.
by tapas73 5y ago
which is which?
54.
by tapas73 5y ago
Linked article conveniently forgot to mention the relevant footnote from original article: > This may seem paradoxical, since atheists and agnostics have very low levels of religious commitment and yet score very well on the survey quest
55.
by tapas73 5y ago
Pushing Serbia away from Eu (democracy'ish), would push Serbia into hands of Russia & China (authoritarian'ish). I know whos influence on Serbia I would prefer. (for my self (eu) and for Serbia)
56.
by tapas73 5y ago
> I was ... We'll need a peer reviewed article to believe that.
57.
by tapas73 5y ago
Are you sure there is such distinction? (cognitive level ethics vs emotion) As I see it, if there are no emotions/emphaty then field of ethics has no use.