tantalor

6 ms·

91.
by tantalor 2mo ago
There's a lot of assertion here and the other article that this fraud and abuse but is there any evidence of that? A simpler explanation is that that this is just a resale market.
92.
by tantalor 2mo ago
> I checked where you’d expect to find underground marketplaces. Telegram had a few channels, with one being relatively active. It's not exactly "underground" if they clearly advertising public channels out in the open.
93.
by tantalor 2mo ago
Yeah I had the same question. What's the point of the intermediate step?
94.
by tantalor 2mo ago
It's also kind of pointless. Why does a coffee shop need a website anyway? Nobody is saying, "man I would love to go to this coffee shop but I can't find their website". If all you want is "opening hours, the addres
95.
by tantalor 2mo ago
You're hitting on the main point of the article. It has been historically niche (limited supply, specialized use, intense/complex flavor) and recently expanded in popularity to transcend that niche status.
96.
by tantalor 2mo ago
Literally AI slop
97.
by tantalor 2mo ago
> Fixing it would require such a colossal amount of work that it would be impossible to even start justifying it to anyone in management. Bad news: by delegating the thinking to somebody else (Claude) you have become the management.
98.
by tantalor 2mo ago
Leading with a concert photo example is cringe. Camera phones are a scourge on the concert experience. It should not be encouraged.
99.
by tantalor 2mo ago
The color interpolation in 2D mode is bad. Instead of interpolating through RGB, you should use OKLCH Demo: https://jsfiddle.net/t80eLfc2/2/ Interpolating in RGB just uses linear interpolation on each channel, so
100.
by tantalor 2mo ago
Pangram has their FP rate and FN rate rates here: https://www.pangram.com/research/model-card/pangram-4 > Pangram 4 achieves a 0.0041% false positive rate (roughly 1 in 24,000) on 1,000,000 human-written Englis
101.
by tantalor 2mo ago
Pangram says "100% of this text is AI" https://www.pangram.com/history/cec57c46-3a51-4d60-9ba1-3914...
102.
by tantalor 2mo ago
I think the point is to prevent researchers from changing jobs. 1. Researcher makes something 2. Employer patents it using researcher's name 3. Researcher gets a new job 4. Researcher makes something at new job vaguely similar to #1 5.
103.
by tantalor 2mo ago
Scunthorpe mentioned!
104.
by tantalor 2mo ago
Is astrology not allowed in app store? That's kind of a weird thing to ban.
105.
by tantalor 2mo ago
Our heroic self defense group. Their brutish narco terrorist cartel.
106.
by tantalor 2mo ago
The tone and writing style is way off here. It's practically illegible.
107.
by tantalor 3mo ago
We have a good understanding of the function (and more importantly dysfunction of) kidneys, lungs, heart, etc. from high level to cellular level. For brain, our understanding is fuzzy, more like "this part is important for that behavio
108.
by tantalor 3mo ago
Just use protos?
109.
by tantalor 3mo ago
The article is wrong on this point: the fact that he was crossing state lines was not a pretext for the stop. They actually wanted to add another charge. The cameras helped them find the right opportunity to do that. If they just picked him
110.
by tantalor 3mo ago
How would you validate that? An opinion survey? Of whom?
111.
by tantalor 3mo ago
Is expert testimony not evidence?
112.
by tantalor 3mo ago
The solution to pollution is dilution.
113.
by tantalor 3mo ago
> causes no ordinary harm to those nearby I don't see what's the big deal. If it causes no harm, why have any regulation?
114.
by tantalor 3mo ago
It's in the subheading: > “Based on simple math, these outbreak responses—which require rapid, timely responses—are going to be greatly diminished,” the former CDC lab director tells WIRED.
115.
by tantalor 3mo ago
Great idea! We can use LLM to do this. LLM: I ran the check and it repro'd > Did you really? LLM: You're absolutely right. I didn't actually run the check. Good catch! One sec let me do that now... yep I ran the check and
116.
by tantalor 3mo ago
> Real plants do photosynthesis through a physical process (nit) it is more accurate to call this a biological process, or chemical process Saying "physical process" makes me think of inclined planes, free-body diagrams, and EM
117.
by tantalor 3mo ago
Google DeepMind disbands its Nobel-prize winning AlphaFold team https://www.engadget.com/2225849/google-shuts-down-alphafold... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49098375
118.
by tantalor 3mo ago
This crank agrees with you: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/1169760433188...
119.
by tantalor 3mo ago
Not really. GasBuddy has a standard: price per gallon But this is just a map of the lower-priced items, which are available everywhere. You can find a cheap sandwich, bowl of soup, slice of pizza, or taco virtually anywhere. There is no cor
120.
by tantalor 3mo ago
Sorry, what's going on?

More ›