tantalor

21 ms·

1. 511.▲
   by tantalor 10mo ago

   The arrow is too small to click on mobile
2. 512.▲
   by tantalor 10mo ago

   > potential As in, not validated? How do we know this algorithm is any good?
3. 513.▲
   by tantalor 10mo ago

   > this is a very, very bad bug Maybe, maybe not. We know nothing about the bug. It's impossible to judge this based only on the outcomes. For all we know it could be something very innocuous, like a simple translation mistake.
4. 514.▲
   by tantalor 10mo ago

   It's kind of funny this guy doesn't understand his own business. It's not onions. It's lead generation.
5. 515.▲
   by tantalor 10mo ago

   > I don't think this is the best summary of either the FTC's mandate from congress nor the antitrust laws in the US. Okay well I basically copy/pasted from ftc.gov: The FTC’s Bureau of Competition enforces the nation&#x27
6. 516.▲
   by tantalor 10mo ago

   whataboutism
7. 517.▲
   by tantalor 10mo ago

   In July 2025, the Ellisons bought CBS (Paramount) through Skydance. This was approved by Trump's FTC. The FTC is responsible for enforcing regulations that would prevent mergers that negatively impact the quality of services and innova
8. 518.▲
   by tantalor 10mo ago

   > Hybrid drones offer great potential in many industries due to their ability to operate in air and water. "Hybrid" usually means a combination of features from two different things. For instance, a car with electric & inte
9. 519.▲
   by tantalor 10mo ago

   Is "demucs" a pun on demux (demultiplexer)?
10. 520.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    Even in a browser, a compromised JS payload can put your user's data and privacy at risk.
11. 521.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    Several mentions of "the automaton" but no idea what that is. It's a bit vague. The photo of "the automaton" appears to be a melamine white particleboard panel. https://www.linusakesson.net/music&#x2
12. 522.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    I'm not seeing what TypeScript brings to the party here? Looks like regular old JavaScript plus a vanilla dashboard.
13. 523.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    Hey why not? It work for Facebook, right? Wait, no...
14. 524.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    The author has never heard of jQuery
15. 525.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    Indeed, the risk would be you try to sue another company for copyright infringement, and in discovery it comes out you generated that code.
16. 526.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    This has been true for decades. I recall my university classes in mid 2000s talking about examples of machine learning models for grocery store purchase patterns.
17. 527.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    This is, of course, forgetting the fact that the model was trained on heaps and heaps of copyrighted work. Laying claim to anything generated is very likely to fail.
18. 528.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    You're right that derivative works are copyrightable. I got that wrong. I think you can claim the prompt itself. But you didn't create the new code. I'd argue copyright belongs to the original author.
19. 529.▲
    by tantalor 10mo ago

    > Can I even assert copyright over this, given how much of the work was produced by the LLM? No, because it's a derivative work of the base library.
20. 530.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    It's not ironic
21. 531.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    > Launched September 1, 2010 A bit late to the party.
22. 532.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    I always thought Apple missed a huge opportunity to build a social network on top of iTunes. See what your friends are listening to, develop communities around shared musical interests, get better recommendations. Sort of like YouTube now.
23. 533.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    Concern trolling.
24. 534.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    Hot take: regular old source code is just compiler prompting.
25. 535.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    These red and green potions ain't gonna craft themselves.
26. 536.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    This story is several months old
27. 537.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    > Theoraticaly > missleading Please check spelling before posting
28. 538.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Reference/V...
29. 539.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    Given they did not change the name, it suggests the legal challenge had failed. So why do we care?
30. 540.▲
    by tantalor 11mo ago

    Thanks! I was a bit confused by that wiki page because it says "Direction Orthogonal" but like you said that can't be.