Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tanderson92
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Yes. The problem is assuming the only thing that matters with the fourier transform is the DFT. Point #1 is incorrect. Sometimes sampling theorems are misleading (not incorrect). There are cases where it is highly advantageous compute a con
62.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Even twitter requires you to be logged in to view "replies" on a user's profile.
63.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Probably this as well is worth noting: https://twitter.com/xeni/status/1170352857952002048
64.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
> You misunderstood my point completely. I'm not saying that the government's decision to give him a deal actually means he didn't do anything wrong. I'm saying that it likely appeared that way to many people. This na
65.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
You left out the rest of the sentence: > "....and the more money flows to their bottom lines." The reason is because their profits come as a percentage of what is paid, through the enforced Medical Loss Ratio[1]. There is a c
66.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
This is why Form 8949 (column (f)) exists.
67.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
> Since FB is a US company does that mean every single Libra user will be subject to US restrictions - even those which are legal in their country? Will Iranians be able to use Libra? What about Canadians using it to buy marijuana? There
68.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
I was only a few miles away in San Gabriel and did not feel a thing; I wonder if the SGV blocked any of the waves. Wish I had come to campus early today to feel that one.
69.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
This is incongruous with how the book ends — which shows the wife as finding the mask and leaving the mask on the pillow to indicate her understanding.
70.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
They had a duty to shareholders which they broke when they abused their position of trust within the company to hurt those shareholders by stealing information from the company and using it for personal gain.
71.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
More from this author on monopolies (and politics): https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/how-dem...
72.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
If I may add a substantive counterpoint, this newsletter's use of ValleySpeak to talk about occasionally complex technical topics (as well as moving to SoCal, and also reading other more focused things like: https://web.stan
73.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Source? I can quote the author's book on microstructure supporting my position that it is not something else entirely.
74.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Not all front-running is illegal, see this article which discusses a few examples, including quote matching and order anticipation: https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/2013/04/24/what-to-d... Front-r
75.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
> And given how difficult it is to define insider trading that seems like a pretty accurate assessment to me. Alternative data firms are the new expert network firms in the wake of Rajaratnam. I fail to see the parallel with Rajaratnam,
76.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Parallel construction is only a thing that the government can get away with in prosecuting people, because the government has power and individuals do not.
77.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
This is still a market order (ignoring rounding).
78.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Depending on how expansive your idea of the model of ‘computation’ is, there is this old paper: http://zero.sci-hub.tw/1814/0efc01f09f718e409481a47ff90e98fc... TLDR: using optics for sorting
79.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
That's even easier: https://arxiv.org/
80.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
SyncThing also gets this right.
81.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
From the end of the piece: >Moving into the future, it’s hard to say how much more modern the power grid can get since the underlying principles are so simple: three phases per circuit and structures large enough to keep them from saggin
82.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
We could also just designate a limited number of people as politicians’ voice, who speak for him. We could call this new job, I don’t know, “spokesperson”?
83.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Calling out the hypocrisy of top-tier candidates like Biden or Harris with the same panache as in 2008, while advocating policies not considered ‘Practical’, is their explicit goal. Some people view the 2008 performance as brave truth-tell
84.
▲
Lessons from the Early Days of Semiconductors – Carver Mead
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
tanderson92
7y ago
|
0 comments
85.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Very interesting, thank you! This discrepancy I cannot explain, and will have to investigate further. It appears the answer changed in the 2005 CDS, see: http://finance.caltech.edu/Resources/cds (of course, for those f
86.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Despite the Chronicle's attempt to lump Caltech in with other elite schools in not explicitly having policies which forbid this from occurring, it is nonetheless impossible as pointed out in a Q&A done by the Chronicle with various
87.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
https://make-linux-fast-again.com/
88.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
It's a bad-faith fallacy because the OP's point holds even if the playing field is level and the state doesn't have an advantage in any other component than the stated one (time). The bad-faith comment (yours) instead reverse
89.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
The excerpt is from this SSRN preprint, section III: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2790606 The fund went up not down. That aside, I believe the point is that if a bot goes and does that, it is sim
90.
▲
by
tanderson92
7y ago
Yes, and it's a worldwide phenomena. Embedded in this link is Thaler (A Nobel winner) using such an example as a counterexample to one view of the efficient markets hypothesis: https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/10&#
More ›