talawahtech

9 ms·

61.
We Use Web Components(dev.to)
1 points by talawahtech 7y ago|0 comments
62.
by talawahtech 7y ago
AWS Bulletin: https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2019-... FYI if your instances are behind an Application Load Balancer or Classic Load Balancer then they are protected, but NOT if they are b
63.
by talawahtech 8y ago
Lots of mention of CircleCI and Gitlab as the reason for Travis' downfall, which is very true. I also think GitHub announcing GitHub Actions[1] may have been the final nail in the coffin. I think GitHub Actions will become a major forc
64.
by talawahtech 8y ago
Given the scale and popularity of DynamoDB and the distributed nature you would think that they could hire multiple teams just to work on improving it, but I guess it isn't as simple as that. I would love to get a behind the scenes loo
65.
by talawahtech 8y ago
Saying DynamoDB is built on top of InnoDB is a pretty big oversimplification of a much more complex distributed system[1] and for all we know they could have switched out the low level the storage engine on the backend to something like Roc
66.
by talawahtech 8y ago
It sounds like it is built on top of the Aurora storage subsystem that is used by both Aurora MySQl and Aurora Postgres[1]. I kinda expected them to build it on top of DynamoDb's backend and provide the same kind of "Serverless&qu
67.
by talawahtech 8y ago
Several related lambda announcements to around structure/reuse as well: 1. Lambda Layers - Reusable components that can be shared across lambda functions (covered in the linked article) 2. AWS (Serverless) Toolkits for PyCharm, Intelli
68.
by talawahtech 8y ago
The FAQs on the Firecracker website[1] specifically address the difference between Firecracker and Kata Containers. The main thrust being that they have decided not to use QEMU and have instead chosen a much more minimal "cloud-native&
69.
by talawahtech 8y ago
Theoretically, if container start up times are around 125ms it should be possible to achieve this with Fargate + Knative's "scale to zero" functionality[1]. AWS is already working on improving Fargate/Kubernetes integrat
70.
by talawahtech 8y ago
This is huge! It basically removes the VM as the security boundary for something like Fargate [1]. This should lead to a significant reduction in pricing since Fargate will no longer need to over provision in the background because VMs were
71.
by talawahtech 8y ago
This is useful, and long overdue. Trying to deploy a single page app or static site using S3 + CloudFront is way more complex than it should be. Trying to automate deployment using CodePipeline is a real pain. By the time you start to think
72.
by talawahtech 9y ago
Pricing seems to be about 15% cheaper than C4 with slightly more RAM and the same ECU equivalence
73.
by talawahtech 10y ago
The first two paragraphs of this post come across as unnecessarily defensive and combative. Amazon released a product and then released an open source preview project to make that product easier to use. They even mention other similar proje