t1E9mE7JTRjf

7 ms·

61.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Interesting, for me it was quite poetic and a phrasing I specifically noticed and enjoyed. I guess I did know Jupiters the biggest, but wouldn't have been 100% on it, or on heaviest. Not that I'd have a better suggestion, just not
62.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Ok but guys, 6 4 and 6 10 is incredibly tall. Surely you see that's edge case AF?
63.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
I imagine when people started using the typewriter, some people writing on paper said similar things. Ultimately 'shady' things are irrelevant. Shady is subjective, and people don't use a technology for lack of related things
64.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Indeed, if LLMs are just distilled training data, their perspective will be quite human. Makes me think it could be interesting to train them on data from set periods instead, to get varied perspectives, and then see how their perspectives
65.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
In which direction(s) do you think it's skewed? I ask as I'd guess in favour of Musk, but in the last paragraph it says Grok said Musk/doge cuts contributed to the 24 deaths in Texas floods.
66.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Well if they asked it such a loaded question as "Is there a particular group" is it that surprising it answered with a particular group? This seems as much a repeat of the many instances of sycophancy observed with LLMs. Over inde
67.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
This makes it sound like our personalities are a function of our own agency. What about genetics? I agree that our personalities are partly a function of our past lives (trauma as you say), but that's only part of the picture surely.
68.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
> They will exist no matter what Ok, so then they're not a bitcoin thing then right?
69.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Yes, that makes sense, if there were many instances and really the leader could have observed that and better lead. My comment was about this approach in general, and specifically when it's just one incident resulting in someones head
70.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Ah, let me admit - My opinion wasn't about this incident. More of a general response to this approach in general.
71.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
I've always thought leaders resigning in the face of a problem, were doing a greater disservice. Bit of a cop out. Kind of like "Yeah I made a mess, but anyway - bye". That's when you need to rise to it and resolve the p
72.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
I wonder what the implication on data protection / privacy laws and the like would be. Would it be as simple as there'd be no laws, or is the location of the users still relevant?
73.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
I'd guess so judging by the downvotes.
74.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Man, I loved this.
75.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
I'm not sure this is entirely correct. Many have studied homelessness in an attempt to remedy it, and found that it is largely a choice* and thus near impossible to solve with resources from the outside. *Sure, not a 'Hey, this lo
76.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
So because there are bad things in China nobody can say anything that's not negative about China? Or how do you see things?
77.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Sure, but is that relevant? I'm not sure people below the poverty line are acquiring SV companies. In this case as I understand it, no money is being paid - it's a stock deal. For stock that isn't yet publicly trading, thus &
78.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
They are in fact, very, very, VERY real.
79.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
I'd guess it's more recent, since it's more recently we scaled. With slavery, there wasn't consent. So I'm not sure that's comparable. > I pray I get to live to see the end of all of the above in my life tim
80.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Wait until you see Albania.
81.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
You accused someone of eugenics which is a big statement. I'm sure you're aware of the connotations attached to it. As such the onus is on you to back it up. So far you haven't. That the guy talked about autism as causing suf
82.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
The framing of it as natural was to point out that you can't get rid of it. It would be like getting rid of people having favourite colours. We just act like that. >"“We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable. So did t
83.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
> They don't think that. Seems like a straw-man. Top down is maybe the wrong term, but basically it's presented as one thing to get past, that wasn't opted into. That it's a thing in and off itself. That's my per
84.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Thanks. In your view, if people want to get rid of capitalism, or live in post capitalism or whatever, do you think that's possible? I still think you'd need to have consent, and you wouldn't get it as some people want to t
85.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Thanks for such a breakdown at that scale. I appreciate it. (sorry for my slow reply). I think my view of Capitalism is over-indexed to the human to human level. Although as I zoom up to ownership and 1 to many relationships, it gets more c
86.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
I don't know where to being commenting on this, you've raised quite a few points. I've travelled to both Northern Iraq and Syria. Iraq while ISIS were there, Syria before the conflicts started. I'd be interested if ther
87.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Ok, so you don't have evidence of his eugenics, and have instead created a far broader 'eugenics today' category which is to reduce undesirable traits (so broad that it's useless imo). There's something to some of
88.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
Ok, so your counter is an article which as you say was retracted due to inaccuracies, and then several statements which you categorise as him being down on autists. Neither of which support the previous eugenics accusation. These seem more
89.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
If it naturally occurs, it's natural. That there are other systems doesn't mean one begets the other. Diversity exists. Thus your counter example point doesn't make the point you're alluding to. It's a straw man. Li
90.
by t1E9mE7JTRjf 1y ago
What do you mean, can you elaborate?

More ›