szines

8 ms·

31.
by szines 10y ago
This article wouldn't be there if they choose the right tool for this job. Typically for big apps, with Ember.js, you never have these problems what he described.
32.
by szines 10y ago
It looks, corporate world and serious projects already bet on more opinionated, more standardized option, so they bet on Ember.js. Luckily Ember.js is improving nicely, super fast, easy to use, easy to learn and a super smart community arou
33.
by szines 10y ago
If you would like to write complex, big application, or you would like to join projects, where more developer are working on the same application, than there is no better option than an opinionated framework. Faster onboarding, you can impl
34.
by szines 10y ago
@iaml Have you followed this tutorial? http://www.yoember.com Totally free. It is quite easy to follow and you actually build a very complex application.
35.
by szines 10y ago
Moving from Grunt to Broccoli helped a lot. 30 sec went down to a few hundreds of milisec. Broccoli is just insane.
36.
by szines 10y ago
Performance? You compare 100 ms with 150 ms? But actully, the performance is not a question anymore, with the new Glimmer Engine 2 Ember will be the fastest framework, with full backward compatibility.
37.
by szines 10y ago
You guys should switch to Ember, you never will have this problem and you get the best router ever. :)
38.
by szines 10y ago
Angular CLI is actually Ember CLI under the hood. You cannot really compare these frameworks because Ember is far ahead of all. Super stable, matured, adopted the best practices, huge addon ecosystem, brilliant community, easy to learn, gre
39.
by szines 10y ago
You probably missed the best option: Ember.js. It has all the best from other frameworks and it looks the only serious player out there.
40.
by szines 10y ago
If you use Ember.js, which is the most matured and serious on the market, you never had that feeling that JS changes a lot. Consistent and continuous improvement. The best choice.
41.
by szines 10y ago
Especially Ember. Probably Ember is the best choice nowadays for serious project. Great documentation and very matured.
42.
by szines 10y ago
In terms of WebStorm, dont forget to exclude tmp folders and other generated, transpiled content folder to exclude from indexing, otherweise it will be always busy. :)
43.
42 (programming language) the definitive answer to design, code and everything(l42.is)
5 points by szines 10y ago|0 comments
44.
by szines 10y ago
There is a nice tutorial which is about building huge application in Ember.js. Totally free and easy to follow. Check it out. http://yoember.com
45.
by szines 10y ago
Probably the best bet nowadays is Ember.js. You don't have to reinvent the wheel. It works out of the box and you can focus on your application. And no crap. Matured, robust, scalable, faster than others (the new Glimmer 2 is 3x times
46.
by szines 11y ago
Yep, you are right. There was Ember.State and Ember.StateManager, but it was extracted from the final v1.0.0. Instead of having one universal State Manager, router, views, etc got they own. However, this universal State Manager is still exi
47.
How You Keep Your Ember.js Project Up-To-Date(yoember.com)
4 points by szines 11y ago|0 comments
48.
The biggest hiring decision I’ve made as the founder at Vend(medium.com)
1 points by szines 11y ago|0 comments
49.
Four developers, some Ember and a new process(medium.com)
1 points by szines 11y ago|0 comments
50.
The best way to install Node.js(yoember.com)
6 points by szines 11y ago|0 comments
51.
by szines 11y ago
Yep. Ember is the best solution out there at the moment. There is a trend, that silently more and more serious dev team switching to Ember. Ember never had hype period. It works and it is really matured. With Ember you can focus to your pro
52.
by szines 11y ago
I’ve been using ES6 modules in Ember.js development for two years now. Using Ember CLI is simplified down the dev process extreamly. The whole dev app development is so simple and fun with Ember. I don’t understand why people cry about it,
53.
by szines 11y ago
Yep, great choice. I've just updated my free Ember.js tutorial, if you would like to learn more about it: http://yoember.com I'm playing with the server side rendering nowadays, and it is promising. It will be easy to
54.
by szines 11y ago
Yes, you right, if you need only a simple component, React is almost the fastest. However, if you have a couple of level deep nested structure, nested components, React perform very badly. Probably Ember.js will never be the fastest framew
55.
by szines 11y ago
For the same reason I switched to Ember.js. I prefer the more opinionated way, the conventions. It looks to me, this repo try to provide some structure, but this is only one from the other 25 projects which do the same. The development effo
56.
Ember.js 2.3 tutorial, big app, not just todo list (totally free)(yoember.com)
4 points by szines 11y ago|0 comments
57.
by szines 11y ago
Ember.js 1.0 was release in 2013. The udpate pipeline strictly follows the Semantic Versioning standard. There is a new minor version every six week. Backward compatibility is extremely important. Ember.js 2 was released middle of last year
58.
by szines 11y ago
Ember 2 was released middle of last year and the transition was super smooth. Ember's update pipeline is strict and the backward compatibility is serious. Big startups and corporates are switching to Ember, because they want results...
59.
by szines 11y ago
Because Ember devs already found the best tool years ago and they are super productive. The community is huge and super active but they definitely totally ignore this "fatigue" bullshit... you know, if you found your love of your
60.
by szines 11y ago
Well written. Great post. Thanks for that. "People can jump between Ember apps and be productive straight from the get-go. Another thing that blew my mind was that Ember encourages developers to write code in ES6 way and manage asynchr

More ›