sytse

40 ms·

211.
by sytse 6y ago
Thanks for creating this! I think adding support for this in GitLab is a no-brainer. After that we can consider enabling it for GitLab.com
212.
by sytse 6y ago
I think the focus of our Trust and Safety team has been on GitLab.com and not on all GitLab instances. We'll discuss changing this.
213.
by sytse 6y ago
That looks cool! Can someone create an issue to add support for this to GitLab? And maybe we can consider switching GitLab.com to this as well.
214.
by sytse 6y ago
I think the code of this problem is that it is hard to identify if a user is a bot or a human. I've not seen any elegant free solutions to this.
215.
by sytse 6y ago
At GitLab Inc. we have a Trust and Safety team https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/security/opera... that prevents spam. So far that functionality has lived in separate repositories from the core co
216.
by sytse 6y ago
We use Okta (which is in the list) for AD purposes and JAMF (which I'll ask to add to the list but is on https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/business-ops/team-member-e... ) for Mobile Device Management (MDM).
217.
by sytse 6y ago
Thank you!
218.
by sytse 6y ago
Thanks! I think that this is possible because of the transparent culture we created. Other CEOs have the same level of knowledge. There is just no appetite in the company to risk saying things in public. Yesterday someone showed us the new
219.
by sytse 6y ago
For eSignature I speculated on Twitter https://twitter.com/sytses/status/1319360157113970688?s=21 For CDNs we switched from Fastly to Cloudflare because we needed support for SSH (port 22) And for email sending I
220.
by sytse 6y ago
Our spend with vendors isn’t public because that vendors don’t want discounts published.
221.
by sytse 6y ago
Yep, maybe the mods can change the title to reflect that this is the software GitLab the company uses. This was probably submitted to Hacker News after someone saw my tweet https://mobile.twitter.com/sytses/status/
222.
by sytse 6y ago
Correct, GitLab running on GCP file servers for git repositories and GCP object store for most of the rest (container registry, artifacts, etc.)
223.
by sytse 6y ago
We (GitLab) have strong planning features but are missing workflow enforcement. GitLab also has a wiki but it is less user friendly than Confluence.
224.
by sytse 6y ago
What agile stuff are you missing from the paid versions of GitLab? We have epics, roadmaps, milestones, and iterations. The only thing that is missing I can think of is workflow enforcement, but that doesn’t strike me as Agile.
225.
by sytse 6y ago
This is awesome, thanks for making this. Boundary seems like the missing open source building block to achieve Zero Trust. Zero Trust means authenticating per application instead of per network. For more context see https://about
226.
by sytse 6y ago
This is awesome! Great addition to the space. Another one I think is great is Sequoia their deck template https://www.slideshare.net/PitchDeckCoach/sequoia-capital-pi...
227.
by sytse 6y ago
And you are accountable to your employees. Take the board I have for example. It is a relief to know that if I’m not longer the right person they will replace me. If you are bootstrapped with 1000+ employees a board might be something you w
228.
by sytse 6y ago
That sounds like a great use case and we would welcome Matrix support in GitLab. Adding this isn't on our company roadmap so it would have to be a contribution. See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/
229.
by sytse 6y ago
1. ChatOps is still a feature of GitLab https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/chatops/ and supports multiple chat platforms. GitLab doesn't need to own the chat to make chatops work. 2. GitLab contacted Matrix.
230.
by sytse 6y ago
From the GitLab side we're very happy with the new home for Gitter. Chat is very useful but using multiple incompatible technologies has lead to fragmentation and silos. For example external developers being on Gitter when the organiza
231.
by sytse 6y ago
Thanks for the clarification, glad to hear it is allowed.
232.
by sytse 6y ago
This is certainly a great improvement in the license! Kudos to TimescaleDB. I wonder if the new license allows us to offer services on top of TimescaleDB in a multi-tenant setting. GitLab.com has metric monitoring https://docs.gi
233.
by sytse 6y ago
Nikola responded to https://hindenburgresearch.com/nikola/ which is a solid read.
234.
by sytse 6y ago
One downside of security by obscurity is that it makes it harder for whitehat people to spot problems in your code. It is like asking everyone $1000 to look at your source code. It is relatively more likely to deter whitehats since their up
235.
by sytse 6y ago
We certainly did the math. And a small percentage of the users generate a large percentage of the CI minutes. Hence the change.
236.
by sytse 6y ago
Thanks for mentioning us, if someone if looking for the docs they are on https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/packages/container_registry/
237.
by sytse 6y ago
They elaborated on their choice for GitLab on https://octobus.net/blog/2018-09-18-heptapod-announce.html "Gitlab has been one of the fastest growing platforms in the past couple of years. It has a strong feature s
238.
by sytse 6y ago
It is great to see people using GitLab to continue to use Mercurial now that BitBucket deprecated it https://bitbucket.org/blog/sunsetting-mercurial-support-in-b...
239.
by sytse 6y ago
Kelsey Hightower had a good take in https://twitter.com/kelseyhightower/status/12963119515307048... "AWS Controllers for Kubernetes is pretty dope. You can leverage Kubernetes to manage AWS resources such as
240.
by sytse 6y ago
If you want to run a local registry to stay below the 100 pulls per 6 hours limit please consider GitLab. The Dependency Proxy https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/packages/dependency_proxy/ will cache docker

More ›