Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
syshum
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
55 ms
·
511.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
Highly unlikely that the police issued the EAS about COVID, also even if you can not vote out the police, you can vote out the head of the police (sheriff or mayor) who would have had to approve an EAS about covid However these types of me
512.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
That is the thing people often do not understand about regulations, even EPA regulations. It is very often not about safety or protection of environment, it is about protectionism of businesses. No Pleb you are clearly to dumb to do anythi
513.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
"Eco Friendly cleaning liquids" i.e Water + Fragrance + Food Coloring
514.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
This data should not even have to be requested, it should just be available via a API, or a minimum a structured data download of some kind
515.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
Microsoft wants to sell Visual Studio, this is why Visual Studio Code will never get a GUi Designer, or have easy compile options for C#. Hell just recently they were trying to take away hot reload to keep that feature as a paid feature on
516.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
>>>Tornado and other storm warnings haven't been issued by county for several years now... depending on how you get your storm alerts, you might still be alerted by county, though-- that's my big complaint about the curr
517.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
I have never once dropped what I was doing an rushed to a shelter unless forced to do so by overriding company policy while at my employers place of business. If I am operating under my own accord if a warning is issued I normally find the
518.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
Sure, that is pretty standard I am not sure how you think that disproves some of the comments in and around this thread saying people were "not allowed to call in" or "why was the facility open" or other things like tha
519.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
My area never did that, any government that used EAS for that should be voted out at the next opportunity
520.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
years ago they would only call a warning when they had a confirmed visual on a touch down, I am not sure when they made the change but for at least the last few years (and probably longer) I have noticed them calling more and more warning
521.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
> it seems like when they do occur they are increasingly more damaging and closer to densely populated areas. I think this more a function of urban sprawl, and the fact there are simply more populated area spread out over larger tracts o
522.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
>>I would also be interested in the standard practice at other workplaces in tornado alley For my Employer, in a high tornado state.. Watch: Monitor but no change in business Warning: Equipment is shut down, employee move to interi
523.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
because tornado;s are not hurricane, and you literally only get a few minutes notice... not days like you do with a hurricane Unless you think every business should shut down every time there is a tornado watch issued, which hell they iss
524.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
Ok, I will address what you have asked for. Tracking based Ads generated by Google Ad-words and other networks should cease being viewed by content creators as the "primary source" of revenue, creators need to get creative and c
525.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
I hope this post was sarcasm
526.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
This is a difference in worldview as to what the proper role of government should be. For insulation, no I do not believe there should be a government enforced standard, and analog to the IT world, we have all kinds of "standards"
527.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
Sure, Setting it at home, or in lab is easy. Now do it across complex collapsed core network with 1000's of devices spanning multiple locations with multiple WAN's of differing types that all have to route together
528.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
It is not just ISP, I would guess a TON of corporate, enterprise, and business networks have no functionality of ipv6, even if their hardware supports it, the first thing the network admin does is disable all that.... I am surprised you s
529.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
You are correct that the public does not want to pay for them, this does not mean the government should be allowed to adopt them as well The government should not adopt anything as law that is not publically accessible, the law absolutely
530.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
At its core companies sell stocks to buy machinery and other things to invest in their business. >>You didn't work for it and - since you were able to put it aside for a later use - you didn't actually 'need' it. S
531.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
It is pro-capitalism... I am pro-capitalism. I think capitalism is awesome Sure business will do what they can to pump shareholder earning, the check on that is market competition. In this instance various government regulations , and
532.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
That would depend on where you put the traffic light, and the operational state of the light... an Unneeded, nonoperational light (which alot of regulations are) would be the root cause
533.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
I find this example very ironic, given that the reason an " ambitious motherfucker " can take a cheap commodity like insulin and make it a monopolized product is directly a result of government regulations. The very same governme
534.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
So if I worked as a doctor for 20 years, invested most of my income in that 20 years in to dividend paying stocks, then at age 45 or so retire to live off my dividends that my hard work paid of, I did not earn any of that?
535.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
Well depends on the person. to me personally I would pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for a couple acres of land in the country side, and would pay exactly $0 for any property in Manhattan
536.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
You can find that just about any statement will result in plenty of people being upset about it. We in the first world society have made life so resource abundant that people need to invent new ways to be seen as a victim, be offended by a
537.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
>>Right, but I hope you also acknowledge that the US does not have very many flexible, customizable offerings competing in healthy markets? The implication here is that the health market in the US is a free market? I will agree with y
538.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
In a perfect system, filled with perfect altruistic people, that always have perfect information, serving a community of people that all have the exact same needs then yes a monopoly would always be more efficient. We do not live in such as
539.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
"Well" is subjective, "well run" Governments by their nature have run programs to meet the needs of the "average" person which means there will be many people for which the programs simply do not work. Poorly
540.
▲
by
syshum
5y ago
Yea I will pass on that as well, as an example I my City pays a private company to pick up trash, I have no recourse, I have to pay the city, the company has no obligiation to me at all, and there fore I get TERRIBLE trash service When
More ›