sysguest

7 ms·

91.
by sysguest 6mo ago
yeah that's why I said the whole operation is "all or nothing"
92.
by sysguest 6mo ago
> it’s just a hated state apparatus trying to survive. well unfortunately its survival would mean tighter control of iranian populace: it now has an excuse to do so ("are you an american spy? why do you disobey higher command?"
93.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well I didn't expect this to be easy but at least I expected US to be more prepared than this
94.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well by that logic, you can argue every top gov officials who didn't sign up for https://landing.google.com/intl/en_in/advancedprotection/ is incompetent, BECAUSE NSA IS part of the government ? dude at
95.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well I guess its time to grow nitrogen-fixing plants like beans & peanuts...
96.
by sysguest 6mo ago
> POTUS had hired someone with relevant FBI experience instead of a political hack. well what percentage of highly-rated FBI people have actually enabled that feature? did FBI had some internal recommendation to enable that feature? FBI
97.
by sysguest 6mo ago
no but I've been interested in cryptography/anonimity stuff, so I see a lot of suggestions/advertisements related to those: signal, telegram, proton-mail, etc
98.
by sysguest 6mo ago
damn the whole operation is all-or-nothing... US just shouldn't have started this if it couldn't finish off the regime cleanly this is going to become a worldwide economic disaster: iran learnt it can 1. bully nearby gulf-nations
99.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well if you're listing your hopes, not talking from what those hackers brought... that just means the operation is a dismal failure -- nothing to see this really undermines iran hackers' claims regarding 'big things' on
100.
by sysguest 6mo ago
idk if you have to dig in and link to some amazon link... this iran hack is a dismal propaganda failure... nothing much to see I guess
101.
by sysguest 6mo ago
yeah that world-event gambling stuff gotta stop... I mean, if I can send troops, I would bet on sending troops, wont I? those gamblers who aren't Trump or any 'event initiators themselves' must be idiots of extraordinary qual
102.
by sysguest 6mo ago
> The fact the Director of the FBI did not avail himself of this well even I haven't seen/heard about this... maybe google should advertise more? (or... maybe I don't look important to google :( ?)
103.
by sysguest 6mo ago
woah but even I haven't heard about that gmail feature...? maybe google doesn't advertise about this much?
104.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well... I actually think even when trump is impeached, the democrats will continue -- even more so, to call mr trump "a weak president" I mean, can US and its allies exactly stop at status quo? Iran just learnt it can missile near
105.
by sysguest 6mo ago
> its outlasting the American will for the war until a leadership change happens well even in the best-case scenario (trump impeachment), I highly doubt any democrat president can actually stop at status quo -- rather, the next president
106.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well you don't expect them to fight bravely -- well, I don't even expect Saudis to even send their own citizens to iran rather, you expect them to pay for the missiles and mercenaries like gurkhans
107.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well I don't actually think Saudi & UAE will send their own countrymen... rather, they'd just use oil money and pay gurkha mercenaries
108.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well with all the oil money, saudis and UAE don't even have to send their own citizens: they can just pay gurkha mercenaries for the job
109.
by sysguest 6mo ago
> it's extremely hard to "make a lesson out of" Iran if you depend on moving oil past their borders it's not just gulf states -- look at who are the customers of those gulf states are. the whole asia, europe, and amer
110.
by sysguest 6mo ago
yeah I did expect US to know all those things... but what I did NOT expect, is how Iran regime would choose strategically suicidal options just to "feel good" missile-rambo even on non-combatant countries? that'll trigger sel
111.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well I guess that makes Iran really fked up... the strait-using countries are surely going to "make a lesson out of" iran exactly for that reason
112.
by sysguest 6mo ago
woah so you read this as "iran is morally wrong"? well, that's secondary thing right now what's dumb is dumb what's the least thing you should do when fighting a war? making more enemies. even on moral side... if so
113.
by sysguest 6mo ago
> which country started this whole mess? what has already started, is already started -- I agree on Trump being dick, but does that make iran's "making new enemies" a wise move? > NATO already told trump no, other count
114.
by sysguest 6mo ago
That's what will happen due to iran's dickhead move... Being bombed does not mean it can target non-combatant countries without consequences... Nor does it mean it can start tolling ships $2M per voyages... Now that current iran r
115.
by sysguest 6mo ago
idk this move, along with firing missiles even to non-combatant countries, is going to fuk-up iran... I mean, even before the $2M toll, if you're kuwait/UAE/saudi/etc, what choice do you have? form a coalition against ir
116.
by sysguest 6mo ago
wtf was this a upfront lump-sum money? well even if I was the ISP, I'd just take the money and make the job "take forever"
117.
by sysguest 6mo ago
well for electric grid, you only need "local" connections -- eg. just your town and the generator...
118.
by sysguest 6mo ago
this people here don't understand how large USA is -- connecting every corner with copper/fiber, with all the intermediary networking devices means tax money...
119.
by sysguest 7mo ago
well that's a different 'kind' of corruption corruption you have to GIVE to get stuff done vs corruption with loophole for RECEIVING money (I'd rather have the latter )
120.
by sysguest 7mo ago
fking can't understand this one... I mean, it's much cheaper to buy 2x8gb than 1x16gb or even 1x32gb (and 2x8gb is faster than 1x16gb..) are these people idiots??? ram-slots are computer real-estates

More ›