synchronise

12 ms·

91.
by synchronise 12y ago
I would use this, I really would, but the problem I have with ZFS RAID-Z1 and 2 shares, once you setup the storage pool, you can't dynamically add hard drives to the pool, you have to set it up weirdly like RAIDZ-1+1. All I want to do
92.
by synchronise 12y ago
I personally like the idea of Gridcoin more, because BOINC lets you use your processing power for other things than just folding proteins (although with Rosetta you can still do that) like searching for aliens or looking for gravitational a
93.
by synchronise 12y ago
Disabling JS would be a good start to avoiding those issues.
94.
by synchronise 12y ago
There's always the ug (micro-g) GAPPs replacements, still waiting for someone to release compiled binaries and a guide so I can try it out for myself. https://github.com/microg
95.
by synchronise 12y ago
Bitmessage is abhorrent for sending offline messages with, the rebroadcast system does not scale well. You need a good DHT solution like I2P Bote to get a decent, decentralised offline messaging system.
96.
by synchronise 12y ago
And this is why self regulation rarely works in for-profit industries.
97.
by synchronise 12y ago
Exactly, federated Pirate Bay solves many problems.
98.
by synchronise 12y ago
Welp, looks like it's time to rebase on I2P.
99.
by synchronise 12y ago
I've always wanted to tinker with one of these PC's, something about using the same microcontroller as Galileo. What was it like using it?
100.
by synchronise 12y ago
When will you guys be working on implementing jails or another containerisation solution? Pretty much every other major OS out there like GNU/Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris offer some sort of solution like that, but OpenBSD and co sadly do
101.
by synchronise 12y ago
Well the author could always append AGPLv3 licenses to all of his original code. The parts that he integrated from MicropolisJS would still remain licensed under the GPLv3, but the greater work and resulting binaries would be licensed under
102.
by synchronise 12y ago
Would you have any recourse if he went the other way, and made his code AGPLv3? You would be unable to use that code unless you moved the entire whole work over to the AGPLv3 license, would you be prepared to do that in order to integrate f
103.
by synchronise 12y ago
What I don't understand is why Tor doesn't bundle their relays with their clients and have a network that scales better naturally, like I2P, and instead relies on people hosting their own, hopefully high bandwidth, relays.
104.
by synchronise 12y ago
BitXBay is another concept, using Bitmessage as its primary protocol. https://github.com/bitxbay/BitXBay
105.
by synchronise 12y ago
There's also this: https://github.com/bitxbay/BitXBay
106.
by synchronise 12y ago
Two national courts actually, there's the Federal Court too. Then you have all the specialised courts, like the Family Courts, the Environmental Courts, the Court of Disputed Returns and many others that I can't remember off the t
107.
by synchronise 12y ago
Is there any way of getting this to work with Syncthing or BitTorrent Sync so I don't have to use a 3rd party server at all?
108.
by synchronise 12y ago
I2P still preserves anonimity with its connections, the same cannot be said about using Tor in this client-relay fashion. I would still recommend I2P for a project like this, anonimity is the key goal here.
109.
by synchronise 12y ago
The architecture is already there with I2P, it has proven to be efficient over I2P, Tor already has extensive use as an anonymous web browsing tool, whilst adding relays to each client would help mitigate Tor's network constraints some
110.
by synchronise 12y ago
The latter's network capacity scales up with each new user due to its design, which is far more efficient than the separate client-relay design that Tor uses. And simply because Tor has the benefit of a greater pool of users doesn&#x27
111.
by synchronise 12y ago
I've heard that the API is being re-factored almost completely at the moment. Would someone be able to post exactly what's being done?
112.
by synchronise 12y ago
I fully support this venture with I2P, since the infrastructure is pretty much already there. I'm not an experienced programmer, more tinkering than anything, but I suggest that you pass these messages onto some of the I2P devs on Twit
113.
by synchronise 12y ago
This is exactly the same way how I2P propagates its network, each peer is also a relay. However, he should have used I2P, it's much more suited towards this project than Tor ever will be.
114.
by synchronise 12y ago
This is basically exactly what I2P does automatically. Each peer is also a router, so that point is covered. It already has a well documented method of transmitting torrents over the protocol, unlike Tor. I2P has dedicated .maggot links too
115.
by synchronise 12y ago
Yes, it rolls it's own DHT to connect users and encrypts all communications between them end-to-end, but makes no attempt at anonymity for direct friend-to-friend connections once authenticated IIRC.
116.
by synchronise 12y ago
That doesn't seem to have had much activity lately. Personally I use Torsion https://github.com/special/torsion/
117.
by synchronise 12y ago
Good thing that with modern computers and better memory management those IPC issues are largely negated in this day and age.
118.
by synchronise 12y ago
Firstly, isn't this designed to completely replace Ghostery? Secondly, doesn't Ghostery have privacy issues by sending your browsing history to a 3rd party?
119.
Haiku's Webpositive browser gains native HTML5 video/audio support(haiku-os.org)
1 points by synchronise 13y ago|0 comments
120.
by synchronise 13y ago
Were these auditing Pidgin specifically or libpurple as well?

More ›