sylware

47 ms·

931.
by sylware 2y ago
I think if the "burns" are long enough, it will be sufficient to extract net energy... actually... All that depends on how much burn heat we can get from those ~30mins burns... :)
932.
by sylware 2y ago
Currently coding my little wayland compositor... for AMD GPUs, in RISC-V assembly running on x86_64 with a x86_64 assembly written little interpreter. Getting ready. Dunno if I'll reach something usable... you know... IRL interferences
933.
by sylware 2y ago
Meanwhile... the "steam client" on elf/linux is still 32bits and hardcoded for x11/GL (nope, no tables of functions with wayland/vulkan/gpu fallbacks...) ... and don't forget about those bash-only scripts
934.
by sylware 2y ago
They are certainly not... you better cherry pick and get deep into the details... where it lies...
935.
by sylware 2y ago
Getting mixed signals about this. Lies are flying all over. I'll need to check that by myself one day. What's seems to be really sure though is the filth of rust syntax complexity on par with the other filthy one, c++.
936.
by sylware 2y ago
If you think google and microsoft are good examples, good on you :). That said... I have been having seriously mixed signals about this. In the end, I'll have to check that by myself to get a final answer to who is lying here. And ther
937.
by sylware 2y ago
Just need to deliver the right engineered DNA fix for a type of cancer and to the right cells...
938.
by sylware 2y ago
So it means rust cannot do that. Ok, next.
939.
by sylware 2y ago
I am talking C without any runtime: machine code or data are _ONLY_ from the C code (and OS interaction is done with raw syscalls). Can I do the same in rust?
940.
by sylware 2y ago
I want to have fine-grained and full control over memory management. Can rust generate usefull machine code without a runtime and having to break one leg like C?
941.
by sylware 2y ago
GPU is all about performance. Nearly all the time, very high level languages have nothing to do there. The CPU part of high level user applications will probably be written in very high level languages/runtimes with, sometimes, some ot
942.
by sylware 2y ago
It would mean we need more RISC-V performant hardware. Because the real and honnest way out from C is assembly (with super high level languages with interpreters written in assembly). And it means a worldwide royalty free standard. I guess
943.
by sylware 2y ago
The general idea is 'ultra complex syntax' languages does not belong to the kernel. That said, inline assembly should be optional and many c11 ISO tantrums should not be there too...
944.
by sylware 2y ago
Where? And the scale is to supply the whole world?
945.
by sylware 2y ago
So, Intel has its better "18A" process and we have no idea when they will start production at scale and where? Weird.
946.
by sylware 2y ago
Please fix rust to make its toolchains statically link libgcc. Bug since 2015...
947.
by sylware 2y ago
mmmmh... chat-gpt 5 and their other models are so much a disappointment they want to sell fast? That bleeding money went to nvidia(US) and the US electric grid, so its FINE from a US point of view (I don't think a lot went to TSMC(taiw
948.
by sylware 2y ago
... with US chips... Trump already LOLing. :)
949.
by sylware 2y ago
It is sad to see that much attention given to LLM in comparison to the other types of AIs like those doing maths (strapped to a formal solver), folding proteins, etc. We had a talk about those physics AIs using those maths AIs to design ha
950.
by sylware 2y ago
How is it humanly possible to miss the point that much? Pure evil AI?
951.
by sylware 2y ago
thx! After reading it, I tought: "finally... but going to be tough since the ego of many mathematicians will be in the way..."
952.
by sylware 2y ago
site is javascript walled. Any noscript/basic (x)html alternative? Or even txt?
953.
by sylware 2y ago
Don't use rust for game dev for linux: the rust toolchain has been buggy since 2015 and is unable to statically link libgcc.
954.
by sylware 2y ago
Huh? This is much more complicated than a ridiculous $5m buyout. They will spend you out of business, financially chock you if you follow the 'basic economic rules', they even won't know you exist. Yes, this is delusional. Yo
955.
by sylware 2y ago
I am already dreaming of the day I'll play AAA games on my RISC-V workstation (on a linux based OS, probably without ELF binaries anymore though). Or have a RISC-V smart phone, with my own linux based OS.
956.
by sylware 2y ago
I have not updated my noscript pdf reader in years... The dreade update is coming up though: mupdf.
957.
by sylware 2y ago
Oh, and a few weeks ago, google search started to block all new noscript/basic (x)html browsers...
958.
by sylware 2y ago
This is a lie since I don't have a google account, and cannot search on google anymore since noscript/basic (x)html browsers interop was broken a few weeks ago.
959.
by sylware 2y ago
I don't think I can buy this in my country at a reasonable price. It is very hard to pay online for me as amazon broke interop with noscript/basic (x)html browsers a few years ago (and you can pay using local wallet codes with usi
960.
by sylware 2y ago
This is not what I said: 1 - they have their own cash from huge racketering (forced) monetary streams. 2 - then, you still have the tens of thousands of billions from funds like vanguard and blackrock. Those gigantic amounts of money are &

More ›