sylware

41 ms·

841.
by sylware 2y ago
That's why I said extraction and production.
842.
by sylware 2y ago
China to the world: "poison your own people for your own rare earth production/extraction with your own pollution"
843.
by sylware 2y ago
Good. Only wayland RISC-V 64bits binaries from now on, even for the web. We don't need anything else anymore.
844.
by sylware 2y ago
Capitain Obvious. More than ever since github broke for good noscript/basic (x)html support under the guidance of... msft not that long ago (I am a noscript/basic (x)html user). This will attract the fire of msft "trolls&quot
845.
by sylware 2y ago
Corollary: many wrongly think the account creation spam is a BOT issue, they forget about click farms (real humans) using VPNs. And AI strapped to mouse and keyboard on an headless google or apple web engine trained with the data of click f
846.
by sylware 2y ago
Extreme Sleep deprived people did hallucinate. Nature may give us some hints to improve "AI" reliability.
847.
by sylware 2y ago
Rust toolchain has already a bug since 2015: it cannot link statically libgcc, namely it does not have "-static-libgcc" option since 2015. I got the bug with "TinyGlade" video game (extremely good BTW), which is written
848.
by sylware 2y ago
This article missed a critical point which is "the right way" to select a glibc ABI version: see binutils ld documentation, second part of the page related to VERSION support. This must include glibc internal symbols. This will al
849.
by sylware 2y ago
Cannot read it: "javascript required" Interoperable in the web means noscript/basic (x)html.
850.
by sylware 2y ago
Any update on noscript/basic (x)html interop of french administration web sites? It is good to straighten the other guys, hopefully they do not forget about themselves.
851.
by sylware 2y ago
On the pain side: is it "official" that github issues cannot be posted anymore with noscript/basic (x)html browsers?
852.
by sylware 2y ago
What I really would like to know: do they use a web crawler with an AI strapped to the mouse and keyboard of a javascript-ed web engine?
853.
by sylware 2y ago
Is gnome4 HDR native 16bits ARGB? Are high-DPI display surfaces properly handled? (you know, for those "end game" 166PPI OLED 4K 748374Hz monitors).
854.
by sylware 2y ago
I am self-hosted (email + web), I did quit the DNS (which registrars are now mostly hostile to noscript/basic (x)html browsers anyway), and I thought it would give me some relief... Nope. You don't have only the AI crawlers, you h
855.
by sylware 2y ago
Basic questions: is there a rate limited 'anonymous' token to access the HTTP api? Or do we need to create an account in order to get a secret? If yes, does this account creation is compatible with noscript/basic (x)html brow
856.
by sylware 2y ago
I am self-hosted, then I don't mind clouds, US or not, but... I am fed up with those "clouds" which are closing their eyes on the fact that they are weaponized by hackers, to point I started to think they actually want that,
857.
by sylware 2y ago
Could not find the number of 'parameters'. And it seems it is not following the rightous deepseek as its inference model is secret, unable to verify it locally.
858.
by sylware 2y ago
I would connect my 4G USB modem and my USB 'dvorak' keyboard. Would I need a _powered_ USB HUB? And I would need a kind of a "stand", which would not be the keyboard.
859.
by sylware 2y ago
Proud user of noscript/basic (x)html browsers here. Lynx and links (and I wanted to _code_ my own using netsurf libraries). Restoring noscript/basic (x)html will only happen with hardcore regulation (or "tarif"/&quo
860.
by sylware 2y ago
"Monitoring their network for suspicious activity" does not mean to scan ports. It means they have to monitor if one of their hosted "boxes" is actually generating nasty traffic. Once detected, they have to inform the ow
861.
by sylware 2y ago
I mostly agree with you, but nowadays codec blocks are mostly h.265 and ac3 :( They are smart as they will just do a little bit more things in a new codec and renew their patents. The thing is displayport, yep, something is off here, hardwa
862.
by sylware 2y ago
Well, I am self-hosted, and hackers using clouds for hacks/scans (and the so-called "scanners-for-your-own-security-we-swear-we-don't-sell-the-scan-data-to-the-bad-ppl") are really a pain. OVH is not safe (and their scan
863.
by sylware 2y ago
Well, we can all expect sophgo will refrain putting ARM cores in their SOC in the future :( (... and I would not mind displayport instead of hdmi and av1/opus codec block instead of a mpeg one neither... 0 royalties...)
864.
by sylware 2y ago
https://riscv.org/about/faq/
865.
by sylware 2y ago
Indeed, it seems there is something about the SG2000, maybe I should have a look at the various boards with it. I don't really mind about the vector extensions right now as I do code RISC-V core only assembly (not even compressed) with
866.
by sylware 2y ago
If I remember well I did dodge the BL808 as it seems to be very difficult to have a clean RISC-V 64bits kernel to run since the real core is a RISC-V 32bit MCU. It seems to be the same thing with the SG2000. I may go first with some code ex
867.
by sylware 2y ago
RISC-V is interop as the ISA level. No wonder EU and even china are moving towards this US standard.
868.
by sylware 2y ago
This hardware is very interesting (RISC-V). Is the hardware open and simple enough I can reasonably run a custom assembly written mini-kernel?
869.
by sylware 2y ago
How many tens of billions of $ was that program paid by US tax payers?
870.
by sylware 2y ago
Does anybody know about the "oriented" BVH hardware in this new µ-arch? (related to raystuffing). Because, if we finally can trash those horrible glsl BVH shaders in mesa, that would be more than great (or do AMD provide optimized

More ›