sylware

35 ms·

481.
by sylware 10mo ago
In the current state of things, YOU have to provide the proof a kernel anti-cheat is not weaponized by hackers (yet...). It is now common knowledge, kernel level anti-cheats are leveraged by hackers. And we all know this is fully hypocrit.
482.
by sylware 10mo ago
And to manage this purgatory and detect the accounts which will end up there, a live-service game needs an active, permanent and competent team of honnest people, period. If a game studio is not ready to do just that for its live-service ga
483.
by sylware 10mo ago
Well, I read HN. I did stop counting. Unless you beleive in the conspiracy of AI generated news on HN. You are the same type of guys who is going to try to sell 'computer security' as a deliverable, thing which does not exist. Ple
484.
by sylware 10mo ago
Spotlight on the fact we are going back to the dark age of global networking...
485.
by sylware 10mo ago
The new compuserv is google. The new AOL is meta.
486.
by sylware 10mo ago
What are you talking about? 1 - kernel anti-cheats ARE weaponized by hackers. This is not a matter of discussion unless you are into the AI generated HN news conspiracy. 2 - this linux feature should provide (if I recall properly) a very co
487.
by sylware 10mo ago
A user level anti-tampering software (and more with such linux feature) is not a kernel module which is weaponized by hackers.
488.
by sylware 10mo ago
1 - kernel module from anti-cheats are weaponized by hackers. 2 - if I recall properly, that linux feature is a direct mapping of the target user process allowing extreme dynamicity in time, performant, and much more powerfull mechanisms th
489.
by sylware 10mo ago
"kernel anti-cheat" is actually a re-branding of "anti-(non steamdeck)-linux" software, probably to please msft (since sole beneficiary). We all know they are inefficient and weaponized by hackers. You know on linux ther
490.
by sylware 10mo ago
I would have prefer a [java|ecma]script engine I can build with a simple C compiler like quickjs, mujs, duktap, etc.
491.
by sylware 10mo ago
[ecma|java]script
492.
by sylware 10mo ago
The future would be standard ISA assembly writting with a good management of "alternatives" for fast paths. I want hardcore performant RISC-V implementations for mobile/server/desktop already :) Latest silicon node, ofc.
493.
by sylware 10mo ago
Ofc, the code modifications and additional data are not public, neither they are online. And we are talking air gap transfer. I repeat: the second you are online, you are cooked. Everything else is BS, probably somebody is trying to sell yo
494.
by sylware 10mo ago
Doing such "customizations" (which are actually crypto 101) will break all attacks designed specifically for a crypto algo in mind. Even better if you lie on the crypto algorithm. Ofc, that must be encrypted on systems which &quot
495.
by sylware 10mo ago
I don't think this is related to that "critical" stuff. It seems there is a misunderstanding over the classification of 'critical' stuff. We may all have a very different definition. All I know: the second your are
496.
by sylware 10mo ago
You need only cryptographic common sense: it seems you have no idea how much it is easy to modify a mainstream cryptographic software to add basic and robust cryptographic modifications... Are you an AI?
497.
by sylware 10mo ago
It would be reasonably "secure" if it is encrypted on a physically private network using in-house _modified_ _mainstream_ encryption algorithm, then after an over-the-air transfer then you can store it on a third party could under
498.
by sylware 10mo ago
Airbus is putting all its design on internet? wow...
499.
by sylware 10mo ago
What I know: the karma system is broken, because it is very hard to provide a controversial opinion/fact without being mass de-karma-ed. For instance, there is serious hate here about web interop with classic noscript/basic (x)htm
500.
by sylware 10mo ago
On and off, I am currently coding a minimal wayland compositor for linux and AMD GPU(no libdrm), in RISC-V assembly (64bits), which I run on x86_64 with a small RISC-V machine code interpreter written itself in x86_64 assembly. I do not use
501.
by sylware 10mo ago
You should be able to create an API account with a classic noscript/basic (x)html browser (optionally with an email, and that could be an IPv[46] literal email address, you know, self-hosted & DNS free, which is stronger than SPF..
502.
by sylware 10mo ago
Then AV2 is getting ready for VVC if I did understood well.
503.
by sylware 11mo ago
Gogol is part of the whatng cartel with its blink web engine, but that case is more accute with gogol because they own very dominant IP based services which apple and mozilla don't have. There are 2 webs: web apps, requiring a gigantic
504.
by sylware 11mo ago
gogol started to block a few months ago, based of the user-agent HTTP header field, classic noscript/basic (x)html browsers on its search engine. Namely, gogol search is no more a web site by a whatng cartel web app.
505.
by sylware 11mo ago
If I did manage to find them without even gogol search engine, I bet you can manage.
506.
by sylware 11mo ago
It is just a msft proxy... and there are more promising alternatives.
507.
by sylware 11mo ago
gogol has been, for a few months already, explicitely blocking noscript/basic (x)html classic web browsers on its search engine. "Don't be evil". lol.
508.
by sylware 11mo ago
Don't forget the links2 classic web browser! (still missing the <video> and <audio> element support on x11/wayland though). Server side rendering will collect(steal) personal info, it is a no go. The only right solutio
509.
by sylware 11mo ago
Isn't AV1 on the level of H.265? And are H.265 and the future H.266(will face the upcoming av2) free of charge forever and wherever like av[12]? They could do the Big Tech way: make it all 'free' for a good while, estinguish&
510.
by sylware 11mo ago
There are 2 webs. web apps and web sites. web apps require a [java|ecma]script whatng cartel web engine, more and more only the gogol one (blink) will "correctly" work (abuse of dominant position). web sites are noscript/basi

More ›