syjer

10 ms·

61.
by syjer 13y ago
there are two fix: applyOpenSSLFix and installLinuxPRNGSecureRandom . The first is only applied to jelly bean. The prng one is for all the versions.
62.
by syjer 13y ago
What's amusing is that being a swiss company, what they are doing is illegal, as IP address are considered part of the private sphere and they cannot be harvested ( http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2010/09&#
63.
by syjer 13y ago
I thought that now all the google search were over https, so how they were able to track the guy (without direct access to the search data from the google server)?
64.
by syjer 13y ago
If I understood their code/doc, the public keys must be exchanged out of band. So how could the proxy pass for another person?
65.
by syjer 13y ago
from the github repo: 0: it's a lib, and there are at least 2 client being developed (ncurse and qt) 1: it currently compile on linux/os x/window 2: see 0. 3: no, but you could potentially host a "private" boostrap
66.
by syjer 13y ago
and data is not information? It's not that the NSA is capturing only random noise as far as I know.
67.
by syjer 13y ago
doesn't he fall in the "de facto" stateless person as defined by the unhcr http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?docid=4ca1a... ? (just asking, IANAL, so maybe some technicalities el
68.
by syjer 13y ago
>NSA's staunch commitment to protecting and upholding the privacy and civil liberties of the American people yup, no problem at all violating the data from foreign people. No problem at all. This will help american based business. W
69.
by syjer 13y ago
So I guess us, the innocent people, are collateral damage in the interception business? These terrorist cell must be quite chatty if they intercept 500M messages per month.
70.
by syjer 13y ago
This is a business decision from certain Swiss banks due to the impracticality of the situation. And maybe this is what will happen to certain US business too, they will lose customers because they can't give privacy guarantee to forei
71.
by syjer 13y ago
As far as I know, there is no distinction between foreigner or resident person in the data protection law in Switzerland.
72.
by syjer 13y ago
And then who will trust the US company abroad, if they can't guarantee a certain level of privacy? It's so hard to gain trust and so easy to lose it. As a Swiss I admit that I'm quite frustrated by the "it's only fo
73.
by syjer 13y ago
there is an official gradle support (still a work in progress): http://tools.android.com/tech-docs/new-build-system/user-gui... .
74.
by syjer 13y ago
The yundao n90 sports a rockchip RK2918 chip. It's the first chip from rockchip that is able to decode vp8 in hardware [1] (and obviously it decode h264 in hw too). The myth "there is no VP8 hw decoding available" is busted. [1] https://en
75.
by syjer 14y ago
From http://wiki.webmproject.org/hardware/devices it looks like that the raspberry pi support hw decoding (edit: but maybe it's not supported at the driver level...)
76.
by syjer 14y ago
From the list http://wiki.webmproject.org/hardware/arm-socs I would say some devices on the market should already support hw vp8 decoding.
77.
by syjer 14y ago
From the discussion on google+ by the wayland developers [1], it looks like that the reasons given by canonical are quite poor. [1] https://plus.google.com/100409717163242445476/posts/jDq6BAgd...
78.
by syjer 14y ago
They found that the nexus s infringed the bounce back patent. But this is impossible as it use vanilla android which has never implemented this behaviour. So it looks like kinda rushed for _some_ decisions.
79.
by syjer 14y ago
Something like Xtend ( http://www.eclipse.org/xtend/ ) ?
80.
by syjer 14y ago
If you are not allergic to java, flying-saucer is quite good http://code.google.com/p/flying-saucer/ .
81.
by syjer 15y ago
If it's only the gallery that need an update, they could push it through the market I think.
82.
by syjer 15y ago
And initially I thought that EPO patents didn't applied to my country (Switzerland), being outside of the EU: well, I'm wrong...
83.
by syjer 15y ago
What I don't understand is, if EU don't have software patents, how that ruling is even possible ?