swores

24 ms·

301.
by swores 2y ago
My guess is that you're right about that being what's next (or maybe almost next) from them, but I think they'll save the name GPT-5 for the next actually-trained model (like 4.5 but a bigger jump), and use a different kind o
302.
by swores 2y ago
> "I like to adhere to the “assume good faith” maxim whenever possible" That's generally my policy too, when I wrote the comment I felt confident that I wasn't missing a less mean-spirited interpretation that they m
303.
by swores 2y ago
That's certainly a more charitable interpretation of their comment than I gave it, perhaps I was unfair though I rather suspect the intent was closer to my reaction than your ideas
304.
by swores 2y ago
[dupe please delete]
305.
by swores 2y ago
I personally think it's you missing the point, though I suppose if I were missing the point I might not realise it! The fact that some healthcare in some EU countries involves profit is irrelevant to my point & the point of the ori
306.
by swores 2y ago
In some countries they are not profitable, because they are publicly owned organisations not for-profit private ones, and they are run purely for the benefit they provide to society. Please re-read the comment you replied to with this con
307.
by swores 2y ago
The court order provides the means of doing it, it isn't itself a justification for wanting to do it. (Unless your view of ethics/morality is that anything ordered by any court is automatically good, which I'm sure some peopl
308.
by swores 2y ago
> (for a long time, there wasn't!) Back then I decided to never upvote anything, because hitting the wrong arrow was so easy and that I figured no votes was a better contribution to the site than frequently wrong direction votes!
309.
by swores 2y ago
A lot of hassle to save two characters compared to a simple xkcd.com/327 :P
310.
by swores 2y ago
I don't understand why you think a human-inspired general purpose robot won't be able to learn to deal with the issues in your bullet point list. We're already seeing in AI that given human examples they can "learn"
311.
by swores 2y ago
Not even something like "woe" for woah, or "hmf" for hmph? :P
312.
by swores 2y ago
That's completely missing the point they're making, they weren't calling out Rivian as different to competitors it was just an example brand for the discussion of what timeline is reasonable to plan over.
313.
by swores 2y ago
Plus when someone dies, they're more likely to set "dead=1" or similar than to just delete all records about them immediately.
314.
by swores 2y ago
You misunderstood the comment - they mean the team working for Musk making claims about fraud (and yes, plenty has been written in the media, and in HN threads, about them being mostly young men), not that people claiming benefits are young
315.
by swores 2y ago
To add to this, what you're both describing is true of Baleen Whales, which are filter feeders (which includes the Humpback Whale that this story is about, as well as Blue Whales and others). But it's not true of all types of whal
316.
by swores 2y ago
Considering it is documenting, in writing, things that happened, it makes sense that they decided to follow how we write things rather than how we build houses.
317.
by swores 2y ago
Please don't shitpost here :(
318.
by swores 2y ago
It can be used that way, but not always. In fact, traditionally your way is the less common usage. A path of breadcrumbs leads to the gingerbread house, despite the house not existing because of the path (or a road leading to a house, to ge
319.
by swores 2y ago
Is it not still the case that they do correlate, and therefore the article talking about them as biomarkers is not making the mistake you think it is (as if it was talking about them as the thing to get rid of to prevent Alzheimer's)?
320.
by swores 2y ago
It doesn't show causality because their decision of when to do it wasn't random (so maybe when in the mood to go straight to wrapping wires they were also in the mood to turn the key slightly more firmly, or...), and also because
321.
by swores 2y ago
I just read the article in full, and don't understand your point, either. Maybe you could explain what part of the comment you replied to you think is either wrong or already covered by the article, so that either we can realise what w
322.
by swores 2y ago
You maybe meant "magnetic north", not "true north"? Or if you meant what you wrote, then fairly safe to rule out magnetism from being involved! (I suspect it's not involved either way, but I don't know anything
323.
by swores 2y ago
You're correct, but nothing you said changes my mind in thinking that the person you replied to is 100% correct and that QI ought to be different.
324.
by swores 2y ago
Their suggestion is that when using Privacy Pass you'd also send "&config=XX" where XX is an ID of a publicly shared config, so that you get the customisation of whatever config you choose without tying the config to your
325.
by swores 2y ago
SMS is already known to be insecure and easily snooped on with a warrant, and has been used by police around the world in many cases, yet a surprisingly high number of criminals still use it.
326.
by swores 2y ago
I'm entirely against what the UK government wants, however I would say: Although you're right that tech people would still be able to choose secure encrypted options, the fact is that the majority of criminals by pure numbers are
327.
by swores 2y ago
It's not a failure of marketing, it's a failure of being a decent person.
328.
by swores 2y ago
They were responding to "women are worse at handling rejection", and if they disagree with that (as I do too) then it is advancing the conversation to say so, even though it doesn't advance a part of the conversation that spe
329.
by swores 2y ago
Do you have a source? Because that doesn't pass the smell test to me. If they're hiring 10 people and have 20 good, qualified applicants then sure, maybe diversity efforts would mean that a straight white man gets overlooked. But
330.
by swores 2y ago
To add to this - it's just generally not a very interesting story internationally, so naturally we would, even if it were an exactly equal problem in every country, hear about it from the US most and UK secondarily due to our reading E

More ›