swalsh

36 ms·

451.
by swalsh 4y ago
In my opinion, you're not paying $175 for a good looking page. You're paying that premium for an expertise in what will convert, how to build a funnel, and what to measure. I can pay a guy $60/hr in India, and get something
452.
It All Began with Belief(cryptofishx.substack.com)
1 points by swalsh 4y ago|0 comments
453.
by swalsh 4y ago
They've merged on the test net, so the August timeline is sounding realistic.
454.
by swalsh 4y ago
Customers don't ask for you to use a handsaw or a circular saw. They ask for a house at the highest quality for the lowest price. The companies that use the most productive technologies will be the ones that win. I personally suspec
455.
by swalsh 4y ago
This is just me, don't interpret what i'm saying as being some kind of community consensus. Many probably disagree with me. I think nearly anything digital can be turned into a crypto business that can operate more effeciently th
456.
by swalsh 4y ago
Each generation of tech seems to take 3-4 years, and I think we're 2 generations away when I map out a roadmap of needs (which I might be completely wrong about). So 6-8 years? My own personal opinion.
457.
by swalsh 4y ago
> They don't scale by their nature I think there's a few different things to think about here. Does EVERYTHING need to be on-chain? No, clearly not. but for the stuff that does it's been found that you can scale by havi
458.
by swalsh 4y ago
Here have been the phases so far: Gen 1: Bitcoin - general ideas established, mostly a proof of concept Gen 2: ETH - Building on bitcoin's ideas it establishes the idea of the VM + chain, which transforms bitcoin into essentially a new
459.
by swalsh 4y ago
I have an unpopular opinion for which I expect both web2 people and web3 people will downvote me for. The current generation of web3 companies aren't for you. Not your business, not you as a person. You're not asking for it, be
460.
by swalsh 4y ago
My main issue with low carb is that humans have been eating carbs for thousands of years. The obesity epidemic is only decades old. I've seen enough evidence that low carb is working for people, so it would seem like something in the
461.
by swalsh 4y ago
This might be the first, but probably not the last time someone decides to take actions that lead to them losing their job in an effort to defend an AI. We're in a new era.
462.
by swalsh 4y ago
So does this work by essentially bypassing the PBM rebates process, and directly negotiating with the manufacturers?
463.
by swalsh 4y ago
Twitters P/E ratio is 186.12!
464.
by swalsh 4y ago
To me the issue is the supply of tokens is not correlated to the actual underlying supply of goods and services in the economy. Tokens should be minted/burned according to the fundumentals of the underlying economy. Hard to do with a
465.
The Tech Bubble is starting to burst(twitter.com)
22 points by swalsh 4y ago|4 comments
466.
by swalsh 4y ago
Maybe those UAP's are just the species that started the experiment checking in on it's progress.
467.
by swalsh 4y ago
I'm sure this thread will become a long well thought out discussion.
468.
by swalsh 4y ago
I did not accuse you of saying "blockchains are useless because public-key cryptography long predates blockchains". I accused you of saying old fashioned PGP was user-friendly. It's not. It never caught on beyond tech users
469.
by swalsh 4y ago
"I don't care that my application doesn't need to be on all 7000 nodes, not even a factor." This is an interesting topic, blockchain security is very useful for a bunch of applications (i'd prefence that to say stop
470.
by swalsh 4y ago
You should try reading the article. It really isn't about Blockchains. It's saying Web3's identity system is great, with or without the blockchain attached.
471.
by swalsh 4y ago
Metamask has pretty broad adoption. Not quite "my mom" level yet. But it's gone far beyond techies on a fairly large scale, which PGP never really did.
472.
by swalsh 4y ago
This feels like the guy who said dropbox was useless because he has the ability to use rsync. Yeah the technology under Metamask is old, yeah it doesn't have to be connected to a blockchain (but it's damn convienent that it can).
473.
by swalsh 4y ago
We let them own it. But we don't have to let them keep it forever. It was always a choice, but we didn't place enough importance on it, so we chose badly. Now that we understand how important it is we need to redecide, and own
474.
by swalsh 4y ago
>Well then, you might ask, why are we running around logging in with email+password, or god forbid, Login with Facebook? Why aren't we logging into everywhere with public keys, if the technology is so old? I like to to think i'
475.
by swalsh 4y ago
"And in the case of two Ethereum based assets, the third party is the Ethereum network, which can be forked to control the state and data" ETH Classic still exists, but the community came to the agreement that forking was the best
476.
by swalsh 4y ago
"But it could just as easily be integrated with a non-blockchain central authority." Sure, you could. But then you'e in a feudal arrangement instead of a free economy. "And you are still trusting their code to integrate
477.
by swalsh 4y ago
I'm a huge blockchain advocate, but I 100% think this is an important point people need to understand. The blockchain is a great solution for pure digital assets. Its an awful solution for physical stuff. I think this is a holdover o
478.
by swalsh 4y ago
"Sure, if I'm allowed to change the games, I can link them even without a block chain." The game should be integrated with the blockchain directly, if I was unclear I apologize. That means, when you open the game, you need t
479.
by swalsh 4y ago
The games needs to be built to allow this, however here's how it works for games that do implement it. This is using the C-Chain. Most games now would use a subnet (which is like a parallel blockchain integrated with the mainnet, but
480.
by swalsh 4y ago
Trust is a short-cut for the complexities the physical world presents. But in a purely digital world you can build things that doesn't NEED the short-cut. And that's a new capability. It let's you build things not possible

More ›