svnt

11 ms·

211.
by svnt 11mo ago
Because of the inherent capitalism structure that leads to the inevitable: the tragedy of the commons.
212.
by svnt 11mo ago
Anyone with enough money and without an entrenched management hierarchy preventing the right people from being hired and enabled to run the project.
213.
by svnt 11mo ago
By defining any ethical statements as pathos you are attempting to force medical practice to be assessed in a logical frame. It is not valid to do so. It is an interpersonal endeavor with ethical requirements.
214.
by svnt 11mo ago
It is not alleged research fraud. It is admitted fraud. The person is saying they sensed something wrong with her. Dishonest behavior is often discernible in advance if you know what to look for. > Jamal now takes full responsibility and
215.
by svnt 11mo ago
I also replied above, so at risk of overextending myself in this thread: you are either too lacking in discernment to effectively have this conversation, or you are willfully arguing in bad faith. You are describing completely different sce
216.
by svnt 11mo ago
People holding your current naive viewpoint is why we have professional societies with the power to remove licenses/disbar. Someone who takes the hippocratic oath and then behaves in this manner is not fit to be a caregiver. Medical ca
217.
by svnt 11mo ago
I would say the statistical argument is the null argument. To invalidate it you should instead need to come up with a reason why in a billion trillion structurally relevant constructions we must be the only one where life emerges.
218.
by svnt 11mo ago
These are terms of art in evolutionary theory.
219.
by svnt 11mo ago
This is the future of troubleshooting: where did the LLM decide to introduce recursion based on calculation that draws on an otherwise unused global counter and a separate timer initiated at launch for absolutely no reason.
220.
by svnt 11mo ago
How is it not? Other than extremely anthropocentrically? There are at least 200 billion trillion stars in the universe that we are aware of. That is a number beyond our comprehension. Stars generate elements. Elements form molecules. Life i
221.
by svnt 11mo ago
> “if you consider each model to be a company, the model that was trained in 2023 was profitable. You paid $100 million, and then it made $200 million of revenue. There’s some cost to inference with the model, but let’s just assume, in t
222.
by svnt 11mo ago
To do this analysis on an hourly retail cost and an open weight model and infer anything about the situation at OpenAI or Anthropic is quite a reach. For one (basic) thing, they buy and own their hardware, and have to size their resources f
223.
by svnt 11mo ago
The thing you are gatekeeping seems to have been cracked some months earlier by a different group: https://sakana.ai/ai-scientist-first-publication/
224.
by svnt 11mo ago
It is unfortunate that accepting the existence of alien life, which it is hard to argue is not a statistical fact, gives off those vibes.
225.
by svnt 11mo ago
It’s like calling out the county to inspect the home you built but when they arrive it’s a bouncy castle.
226.
by svnt 11mo ago
This misunderstands complexity entirely: The complexity of the task isn't a factor - it's complex to generate correct machine code, but we trust compilers to do it all the time.
227.
by svnt 1y ago
Completely absent is quantity of jobs. If e.g. ml engineer job postings go +40% from 200 to 280 and writer job postings go -50% (over two years) from 20000 to 10000, then we have a better idea of the impact. Without those data this report i
228.
by svnt 1y ago
It should fit enough of the layers to make it reasonably performant.
229.
by svnt 1y ago
It has fallen out of favor based on a lack of evidential support, for sure. It has not really been dismantled publicly scientifically, but mostly quietly, perhaps in order to protect its practitioners, perhaps because the research cannot cu
230.
by svnt 1y ago
I am saying one likely outcome is a federal government that explicitly and openly funds social programs that were formerly available to everyone only in states where it has a political majority. They will begin because they have presently s
231.
by svnt 1y ago
By equating it with last year you are pretending there is no context or history for negotiation and that budget resolutions are just housekeeping, which is exactly the republican talking point and is trivially shown to be untrue. If you poi
232.
by svnt 1y ago
They didn’t put it in there because knowing the flow of CSF is so elemental to performing research in the field that it would be a waste of everyone’s time.
233.
by svnt 1y ago
That is extremely weak to nonexistent counter-evidence that seems to focus on supporting Loftus, who has put a lot of effort into the defense of her public persona. I don’t disagree that it is possible to manufacture memories but the eviden
234.
by svnt 1y ago
I don’t see how they have it wrong? Canaries are lightweight and shallow once they exist. Building a canary from the ground up is still beyond us, but if you don’t want to kill an actual bird that is pretty much the only way to go.
235.
by svnt 1y ago
“We passed clean government funding that cost 20 million people their health care coverage.” You are falling for semantics games.
236.
by svnt 1y ago
And this will work much better in most blue states than most red states, which are more dependent on federal funds. Which means the likely response is the federal government will begin funding what were formerly federal programs in select s
237.
by svnt 1y ago
It seems insane to try to connect a twenty year shift in one global variable to one causal factor. This approach is why the social sciences continue to struggle to create understanding. It is all they can afford to do, though. That said, 3)
238.
by svnt 1y ago
hallucination is just built in, what am I missing?
239.
by svnt 1y ago
Also on the edge, but it appears they are relying on the search-augmented identification of conflicts in the generated statement, which is an easier task than constructing an answer to the question. It also encourages abstention because the
240.
by svnt 1y ago
Leopards ate my face is only negative, and has been more political, typically someone voting to weaponize the government against their peer-level enemies but hypocritically, only to later realize they are not a party to the benefits, only t

More ›