svick

10 ms·

31.
by svick 7y ago
Are you saying that that's a good thing?
32.
by svick 7y ago
Just because something is common doesn't mean it's okay.
33.
by svick 7y ago
> I really enjoy IntelliJ, it makes programming Java like slicing butter. In that case, I think you want an actual IDE and VS Code is not that. The options you have for .Net are Visual Studio and Rider (which is from the same company as
34.
by svick 7y ago
I wouldn't call those libraries. If you have something that's actually just a library, using it from F# should not be a problem.
35.
by svick 7y ago
> While there's nothing you can do in C# that cannot be done in F# Really? When did F# start supporting pointers? > to influence the direction of the other language (C#) Lately, it seems it's the other way around: C# is intr
36.
by svick 7y ago
C# 8.0 will have a switch expression: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/whats-new/csh... .
37.
by svick 7y ago
There is no chance VS 2017 will support it, since it already doesn't support .Net Core 3.0.
38.
by svick 7y ago
> You don't simplify something by adding complexity. Yes, you do, it's called abstraction. For example, C compiler adds complexity when compared with assembler, but that lets you significantly simplify your code. And without ab
39.
by svick 7y ago
Except Java's method that does the same (Math.max) does not use generics and instead has overloads for the various numeric types it supports.
40.
by svick 7y ago
Expression trees are a requirement if you're writing a database client library .
41.
by svick 8y ago
How is an issue you had a long time ago relevant now? And why do you say "fix X first" if you don't even know whether it's still a problem?
42.
by svick 8y ago
> Can Microsoft use open contributed WPF code in UWP? They can, because the open source version of WPF is MIT-licensed.
43.
by svick 8y ago
Where do I get a macOS license that allows me to run it in VMWare?
44.
by svick 8y ago
> It is sending back data about you. And who knows what. This is specifically about telemetry in an open source code. If you want to know what data it sends, you can look for yourself.
45.
by svick 8y ago
As I understand it, if you ever opened such project in VS, it would replace the wildcard with the current list of files. So the usability of that approach was very limited.
46.
by svick 8y ago
What reflection APIs are you talking about? Do you mean things like AppDomain and remoting?
47.
by svick 8y ago
.Net Framework (and ASP.NET) will be supported forever. This is just about the specific combination of ASP.NET Core on .Net Framework, which will be supported until 2021, possibly longer.
48.
by svick 8y ago
I didn't hear about Google OR-Tools before now, but they seem to support .Net Core: https://developers.google.com/optimization/install/dotnet/so... .
49.
by svick 8y ago
I believe MS said they're considering open sourcing them when they're included in .Net Core 3.0. But either they didn't decided yet, or they decided against it.
50.
by svick 8y ago
Visual Studio depends heavily on WPF and COM. I don't think it's going to be running on Linux anytime soon.
51.
by svick 8y ago
If you're using .Net Core version of csproj, it's the difference between e.g. <TargetFramework>netcoreapp2.1</TargetFramework> and <TargetFrameworks>net47;netcoreapp2.0</TargetFrameworks>. I don&#
52.
by svick 8y ago
Note that one difference is that the 2.0 attempt was noticed by a user following commits to the repo. This time, they've made a public announcement about it.
53.
by svick 8y ago
Well, .Net Core started as a subset of .Net Framework APIs. Now that they're adding a lot of them back with .Net Core 2.0 and 3.0, it's no longer accurate. Though ASP.NET Core was never really a subset of ASP.NET.
54.
by svick 8y ago
Also, .Net Framework still doesn't have support for Span<T> on existing types like Stream. Though those APIs will be in .Net Standard 2.1, so presumably they will be in some future version of .Net Framework too.
55.
by svick 8y ago
But there was no good way to edit .csproj files without an IDE and you needed to edit them for every source file you added (or moved). Now you don't have to edit them as often (wildcards for files), they're easier to edit by hand
56.
by svick 8y ago
In the past, TechEmpower benchmarks only ran on Linux, so their benchmarks for .Net actually used the Mono project's implementation of ASP.NET, which was slow. That's why the increase was so significant. If they were comparing ASP
57.
by svick 8y ago
I don't need it. I want it, because C# is my favorite programming language. Isn't that what freedom is about? This means that when I'm writing a website or a Docker microservice, I want to use C#. And since the best OS to
58.
by svick 8y ago
But only for their work on "the Linux System", no?
59.
by svick 8y ago
> In other words it was very unfair. How? Linux is intentionally released under an open source license. As far as I know, MS follows that license to the letter. How is that unfair? Things don't have to be perfectly symmetric to be f
60.
by svick 8y ago
Even worse, they don't even attempt to justify how EEE applies to what MS is doing now. Please, at least try to make what you're saying relevant to the story.

More ›