suzdude

7 ms·

61.
by suzdude 1y ago
> We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it Kimmel d
62.
by suzdude 1y ago
It seems like there is, and will be, a strong reaction from the public (I may, of course, be hoping for something I'd like to see). This thread is certainly active with those critical of the administration. Note, the public at large di
63.
by suzdude 1y ago
> Most leftists despise their parents[sic] politics. And do you have a source on that? Anecdotally, most "leftists" I know have left leaning parents. But it's up to the person to define if they are or are not "leftist
64.
by suzdude 1y ago
>We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it Mr. Kimme
65.
by suzdude 1y ago
Exactly, which was the point Kimmel was making. Apparently that suggestion was too much for the current administration, and the official narrative must not be questioned.
66.
by suzdude 1y ago
Except your premise is incorrect. Kimmel did not repeat rumors, he asserted that the political affiliations were unknown. edit: He asserted the "MAGA gang" trying to distance themselves from Mr. Robinson, which is true. It does no
67.
by suzdude 1y ago
It's rough when very basic premises, "political violence, no matter who causes it, is abhorrent," are up for debate. The minority people who support, defend, ignore, or rationalize actions which have no place in this country
68.
by suzdude 1y ago
No, that's the reason to hate Kirk, not a reason to shoot him. What in his upbringing led him to believe the way to handle the situation was with violence is unclear.
69.
by suzdude 1y ago
Post to a channel where people are calling for the removal of American citizens doesn't really support your argument.
70.
by suzdude 1y ago
What was wrong with what Kimmel said? Is it against the public good to question the motives of the president of the United States? Is it misuse of public airwaves to point out the lack of evidence on hand to divine the political affiliation
71.
by suzdude 1y ago
By U.S.A. standards, authoritarian leaders who use violence as a means of political gain does not align with the Democratic Party of today. During Jim Crow, at the State level in the south, it would be applicable, but that doesn't mean
72.
by suzdude 1y ago
> Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect
73.
by suzdude 1y ago
There are multiple statements from his relatives that his family are "MAGA", his parents are Registered Republicans. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/ty... It seems he
74.
by suzdude 1y ago
Your comment stated "There's nothing new about this, though: ABC also took Bill Maher off the air, 20 years ago, almost identical circumstances"
75.
by suzdude 1y ago
https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/tv/disneys-abc-pulls-jim... Please, don't contribute alt-facts to the conversation.