surreal

13 ms·

61.
by surreal 12y ago
( Typo, Sequel Pro's URL has been put for Alfred App. For convenience it's http://www.alfredapp.com )
62.
by surreal 12y ago
Although they do seem to be backtracking on this stance with yesterday's iCloud Drive announcement [1], giving access to the filesystem they've been trying to hide away for the last few years [1] http://m.techradar.com&
63.
Swift, iOS' new programming language(cultofmac.com)
2 points by surreal 12y ago|0 comments
64.
On undoing, fixing, or removing commits in git(sethrobertson.github.io)
4 points by surreal 12y ago|0 comments
65.
by surreal 12y ago
Looks to me like the $ signs are acting as delimiters, and that that hash is made up of: cipher/hash: pbkdf2_sha256 cost factor: 12000 salt: zhMKabMgayvK hash: iniviUCcX9y2PYJcm0AoB3MhybRA1z2Cec1DZnLWxWc= This exact technique (pretty m
66.
Uber to deliver free cocktails across the city tomorrow(blog.uber.com)
3 points by surreal 12y ago|0 comments
67.
5-year-old finds Xbox security flaw(m.bbc.co.uk)
2 points by surreal 13y ago|0 comments
68.
Evil.js: A JavaScript library for thwarting hot-linkers(github.com)
109 points by surreal 13y ago|66 comments
69.
by surreal 13y ago
Some helpful tips, thanks William. It would be helpful if you explained WHY these are better than jsfiddle though - I'm not disputing that they may well be, but most of the points you list apply to jsfiddle too making your opening rema
70.
by surreal 13y ago
Why has an exclamation mark vomited all over their patent.
71.
by surreal 13y ago
There are challenges, and there are avoidable challenges. If a given challenge (e.g., for this author, being in London) can be avoided then the right thing to do is to avoid it. I'm sure there will be more than enough challenges left f
72.
by surreal 13y ago
Don't get me wrong, I lean towards the "Telegram's security is a joke and the contest is even more so" camp. I was commenting solely on the specific issue: that if someone uncovers a flaw in your software and you pay out
73.
by surreal 13y ago
So what? They're still doing it. Unless it turned out they'd set the whole thing up, which would be different.
74.
by surreal 13y ago
Remember (?!....) is a lookaround , so it matches 0 characters. So ^(?!....)$ will only match an empty string! (Think about it). Try ^(?!....$) instead (the $ anchor inside the lookaround)
75.
by surreal 13y ago
Nice find. It works because it rejects "2 or more x's" repeated "2 or more times". So xx doesn't get rejected, but any multiple of that (xxxx, xxxxxx, ...) will be. The same way xxx doesn't get rejected, b
76.
by surreal 13y ago
Can get 2 more points with: ef|^((?!(.)\2).)*$ But I reckon yours wins for having a pair of breasts in the middle
77.
by surreal 13y ago
... or return foo || null; if you're into that sort of thing
78.
by surreal 13y ago
...more fluid- feeling . I realise that's not an exact science by any means, but it's what you'll generally hear if you give an iPhone and a <resistive touchscreen phone here> to Doe on the street. These are being sold
79.
by surreal 13y ago
It might be technically correct, but if the intention was a loose comparison surely don't include null in the comparison? return !foo ? null : foo;
80.
by surreal 13y ago
iOS apps in Xcode have a "Base SDK" (which is the actual SDK you're building against: must be iOS 7.0 from Feb 1). But you then also set a "deployment target", which is effectively the oldest version of iOS you stil
81.
Beautiful. Moon orbiting Earth for first time ever(sploid.gizmodo.com)
5 points by surreal 13y ago|1 comments
82.
by surreal 13y ago
If the company sees hiring as "tying up one of their Senior Devs for a day" rather than something so important that it warrants investing serious time/resources/Devs on it, then I don't think they "really want
83.
by surreal 13y ago
Politics, eh. I also wonder why Brits have to pay the BBC over $200/yr even if they only want to watch ITV (or any other channel, all funded by advertising)
84.
by surreal 13y ago
I'd love to explain it but it doesn't make a lot of sense to me either. Some kind of law saying that the BBC can't make profit from us in the UK, because they are funded instead by the TV licence fee[0]: we pay the government
85.
by surreal 13y ago
Thanks, I was in that same position—but after all, why would I be able to view British Broadcasting Corporation content from Britain.
86.
by surreal 13y ago
Between the r and the e there is a U+2063 "invisible separator"
87.
The 'massive breakthrough' where little has changed(independent.co.uk)
3 points by surreal 13y ago|0 comments
88.
by surreal 13y ago
> I hate anything that lasts more than 15 seconds to be honest. Wish my girlfriend took the same view
89.
by surreal 13y ago
I've seen this in some countries in mainland Europe. Problem was it asked me on my regular UK debit card, had no idea what to choose, trial and error until one of them didn't spit my card out... Thanks for enlightening me
90.
by surreal 13y ago
Indeed - the one video on his channel was the first YouTube video uploaded.

More ›