sunir

22 ms·

301.
by sunir 8y ago
That is insufficient. You can still infer identities through metadata and behavioural analysis. For instance purchase history and geolocation is often enough to identify some individuals.
302.
by sunir 8y ago
That it isn’t known with confidence is your answer to whether it is worth implying it is easy.
303.
by sunir 8y ago
Why is delete=1 a best practice? There are competing concerns here. The government has now decided for everyone. Agree or disagree it is not worth implyng immorality where no immoral intent is present.
304.
by sunir 8y ago
That’s why they are doing a positive challenge as well.
305.
by sunir 8y ago
It is the same thing that allowed someone to decide to grow high priced export crops instead of feeding their neighbours. And the same thing that allows them to trade their crops for money. The country of Ethiopia is not one collective orga
306.
by sunir 8y ago
You aren’t providing the service across the border. The service is in your own country. The buyer is using telecommunications to make an order across the border. The buyer is the one responsible for knowing their own local laws and should b
307.
by sunir 8y ago
Cost per thousand people. It is an advertising metric.
308.
by sunir 8y ago
I am happy the author is fighting the power. However since most of us live in society we generally would prefer less chaos. The difference between investment to collect data and investment to protect dat is there is no ROI for compliance (i
309.
by sunir 8y ago
When the business is being conducted outside the EU but the EU is enforcing GDPR, it is a problem. The GDPR is specifically written for extrajurisdictional enforcement which is a big change in the world of laws. I am just saying that the EU
310.
by sunir 8y ago
Yes. I do expect that. It is a reasonable expectation that the laws are clearly understandable by those subject to the laws. Just as companies need to be specific about how they use data now the legal-judicial system needs to be specific ab
311.
by sunir 8y ago
When an EU business buys a service from an American operating in America from their website hosted in America how is this materially different than when a Saudi Arabian citizen visits New York and buys alcohol? Why would Saudi law apply in
312.
by sunir 8y ago
Well, the difference is that theft is a natural law. We are born with an instinct it is wrong. Having a data processing officer in the EU for some definition of significant business is not a natural law and requires careful parsing of the l
313.
by sunir 8y ago
You need to travel to the US. They are applying laws domestically. The US is quite opposed to extrajurisdictional law enforcement which is why they don’t sign onto things like the International Criminal Court.
314.
by sunir 8y ago
The word choice of citizen vs resident is a red herring. The issue is the extrajurisdictional reach of the law. An EU resident visiting" your business which is hosted and operated in the United States, is the same as a Saudi Arabian co
315.
by sunir 8y ago
That is not true. You do not need to comply with any country’s laws except the one you reside in, except for treaties by your home country that say otherwise or your desire to travel abroad. Just think of what China would do to the Internet
316.
by sunir 8y ago
No. It is quite definitely not true that you must comply with the laws of countries you are not in. The EU is primarily leveraging the fact that most everyone wants to travel to the EU eventually. While you in your home country you have no
317.
by sunir 8y ago
Yes. You can sell alcohol to Saudi Arabians from Canada. You cannot ship to Saudi Arabia. The buyer may pick up in another location where alcohol is legal including in person in Canada. What they do with the alcohol once in their possession
318.
by sunir 8y ago
Legitimate interests is not defined. So good luck with that. Also you are responsible for downstream guarantees of legitimate interest. He is right that open P2P protocols like XMPP, such as NNTP, IRC, bitcoin, ethereum, etc are not handled
319.
by sunir 8y ago
You still have data hygiene policies to enact which are confusingly legislated. Also legitimate interest is a loophole created to appease some lobbyists but the legislators declined to make clear anywhere because they don’t give a shit abou
320.
by sunir 8y ago
Need to... serve the subject Vs to package and resell the subject. It is a matter of making subjects of data collection in control of their data being sold without their consent to the real customer, someone else.
321.
by sunir 8y ago
You don’t need a lawyer to comply with the law is a weird statement to put out there. You should retract.
322.
by sunir 8y ago
33 years ago... We used to use cash receipts from our convenience store to resupply at the cash and carry. It wasn’t uncommon. I saw transactions in high figures often from my fellow customers. Not sure how common it is now.
323.
by sunir 8y ago
Do NOT mix the companies up. Corporations were invented specifically to separate unrelated concerns. You are not enslaved. You can move on. It will just look irresponsible. Just be responsible. Also startups and marriage are the same in so
324.
by sunir 8y ago
They all have SaaS. Have done since the 1970s. Meaning they have software licenses with renewing service-level agreements and support contracts. The difference is the mainframe is now AWS. They understandably don’t want to host outside thei
325.
by sunir 9y ago
Trump happened. That is why. Real world consequence. Love or hate Trump, the election is what motivated these inquiries. Just listen to the hearings internationally.
326.
by sunir 9y ago
In business. In politics it works.
327.
by sunir 9y ago
You have the wrong question. Whom would it waste resources to deport? Then can they use this to easily create legal pretext to do so?
328.
by sunir 9y ago
They have an idea. You signed up with a credit card and a phone. Experian will answer the rest.
329.
by sunir 9y ago
I used cutting edge deep learning to extract the following: “We are going to waste public money and screw up Toronto’s urban design and pocket a bunch ourselves while hoping no one catches us and yes we are in way over our head.”
330.
by sunir 9y ago
You shouldn’t be driving so fast that stopping distance is longer than visibility. It is irrelevant what average humans do. That is the current rule set for all drivers.

More ›