summm

8 ms·

91.
by summm 3y ago
Bluetooth Low Energy Audio with the LC3 codec should be finally able to do it. And some of the newer headphones support that. In theory. How good this works in practice, I don't know, manufacturers aren't even advertising proper d
92.
by summm 3y ago
That comparison is valid only if you had lots of suppliers and basically a single criterion, such as "feet dry" or in case of Apple "status". However, there are a lot of other reasons why you'd not want bo bend over
93.
by summm 3y ago
Then they have to acquire the rights to do so for of all components before they use those components.
94.
by summm 3y ago
Even Firefox does this. Because of something something security.
95.
by summm 3y ago
True. On the other hand, gnunet tried the standards-based approach with binary specifications, as of yet with basically no adoption. One main problem I see that is very hard to integrate any other language or framework. If veilid now goes f
96.
by summm 3y ago
Where is that wonderland you live in? Around here there is only regulation that dogs cannot go unleashed on specially labelled public parks, such that they do not leave the paths. Many of those parks have playgrounds, public orchards and so
97.
by summm 3y ago
Why is it not done today? Probably because of this: Mining rigs are a larger capital investment. They would have to compete with rigs in countries that don't care about CO2. Additionally, why would they be turned off if the energy pric
98.
by summm 3y ago
Good! This needs to go on, and it needs to hurt even more. This is what you will get for making yourselves dependent on a single monopolistic vendor. Just continue laughing about the Year of Linux on Desktops, and suffer.
99.
by summm 4y ago
Also note their persistent refusal to implement TLS for their web access. This attitude alone tells me never to trust this project ever, even when they finally should use TLS. Sadly there is no other FOSS out there that combines remote sup
100.
by summm 4y ago
They often fuck it up on purpose even. Like back then their legendary "mp3" players that wouldn't actually play mp3 files. Currently their ridiculously short security update available. 3 years only for their 1600$ phone. at
101.
by summm 4y ago
it's a 2nd sealed chamber and shares some sensor parts. Some parts are different, so it's not perfect of course, but much better as the requirement of regular manual calibration. Sensirion SCD30 for example, where you can even see
102.
by summm 4y ago
But that's the whole point? That you can user your own device as a general-purpose computing device, not only as a media-consumption device limited by arbitrary restrictions the vendor of the device can pose on you?
103.
by summm 4y ago
It does not grant root by default, quote: "Whitelist access control Only App that is granted root permission can access `su`, other apps cannot perceive su."
104.
by summm 4y ago
I highly recommend Dual-NDIR sensors that bring their own volume of calibration gas. Auto calibration is not practical in any serious indoor monitoring use case.
105.
by summm 4y ago
- Intel disables ECC Ram support for their consumer CPUs, AMD does not
106.
by summm 4y ago
Audiobooks are usually mono, so 700 kbit/s for uncompressed CD quality. To me parent's numbers sounds like uncompressed. I suspect something went wrong with de-drm/decoding. Should be more like 48 kbit/s for basically tr
107.
by summm 4y ago
That makes it even worse. They apparently do not even try to make it secure and willingly exclude some patches. Reminds me of "security by management risk acceptance"
108.
by summm 4y ago
Yes. The main culprit is bloat and the demise of shared libraries. Application devs are getting lazy. Everybody just packages up their whole dependency tree and slaps on a virtual machine with their own memory management. This would be fin
109.
by summm 4y ago
Android 10 itself is technically still supported with security updates, so nothing wrong with it, if the device manifacturers support the kernel, drivers and firmware blobs... You not caring about those security fixes means you don't u
110.
by summm 4y ago
Nope. Not a great choice at all, specifically not last year's model: Sony only promised 2 years of security (!) updates. That means you'll get about one year maximum of supported use, after that you should scrap it. Much too expen
111.
by summm 4y ago
Recoll?
112.
by summm 4y ago
That's the story of Sony in general. They had great tech but their content division always forced the consumer electronics division to gimp that tech in random ways, which led to the tech failing on the market.
113.
GNUnet messenger-CLI 0.1.0 released(gnunet.org)
3 points by summm 4y ago|0 comments
114.
by summm 4y ago
But all those hipster bicycles don't have a rack and people use backpacks instead, even carry their bike locks like a sash, just. because racks apparently look uncool.
115.
The Pine Formula(tuxphones.com)
3 points by summm 4y ago|1 comments
116.
by summm 4y ago
Do you happen to have a link to said paper?
117.
Native exFAT support finally comes to a Pixel phone with Android 13(blog.esper.io)
6 points by summm 4y ago|0 comments
118.
by summm 4y ago
If they wouldn't stop publishing security uogrades exactly 3 years after each phone's first market introduction in Japan, I would have bought one... Oh, and they cripple the camera permanently when you root the phone.
119.
by summm 4y ago
Just have a separate work phone and leave that at home. It's better for a lot of other reasons too regarding you controlling your phone instead of your employer.
120.
by summm 4y ago
The hardware is quite underwhelming though. Sony as always deliberately crippling their mid-level phone to protect sale of their flagships...

More ›