sumedh

5 ms·

61.
by sumedh 4mo ago
Didnt Google start the race with their paper?
62.
by sumedh 4mo ago
> "4.6 was such a bad model," It's just amusing reading all these posts with different viewpoints, just in this thread there are multiple people saying 4.6 was so much better than 4.7 and that they switched back to 4.6.
63.
by sumedh 4mo ago
Yes but Anthropic made a deal with SpaceX and increase usage limits by 50%, so you might not hit your limits.
64.
by sumedh 5mo ago
Can confirm what others have posted, i tried some random snacks/sweets in some of the 711 stores in Japan and they were really good, for some reason I was not expecting it to be so good.
65.
by sumedh 5mo ago
> Money goes to the person who can hoodwink people into thinking their product will do something they care about So Google, MS, FB, OpenAI could not "hoodwink" people?
66.
by sumedh 5mo ago
Money is the most honest transaction, if people are paying money to anthropic it means its solving their pain. Its the same reason OpenAI and others are copying Anthropic.
67.
by sumedh 5mo ago
Australian govt needs to tighten the rules to discourage people who want to take advantage of Australia but don't want to contribute in return.
68.
by sumedh 5mo ago
> and the board tries to fix that The board didnt have the maturity to fix that.
69.
by sumedh 5mo ago
> Their models aren't the best the market has spoken, for coding they are the best.
70.
by sumedh 5mo ago
Why are you not leaving right now?
71.
by sumedh 5mo ago
If I am not mistaken he had predicted that IBM will go bankrupt, did that prediction come true?
72.
by sumedh 5mo ago
> cementing the thesis of Geoffrey Hinton's Didnt he say there wont be any need for radiologists?
73.
by sumedh 5mo ago
> doesn't mean you get to discount the one business units products to the other That depends, if all developers get used to Claude and Codex it will become harder for Google to attract them in the future. They might lose devs in the
74.
by sumedh 5mo ago
What part is confusing?
75.
by sumedh 5mo ago
They are just copying features from Claude Code.
76.
by sumedh 5mo ago
OpenAi wants non devs to start coding as well, its just going to confuse users when there are two Apps.
77.
by sumedh 5mo ago
Google might shut it down soon.
78.
by sumedh 5mo ago
> But it’s ok to be voluntarily grateful for hard work. You don't become a billionaire using that approach though.
79.
by sumedh 5mo ago
Which AI are you using?
80.
by sumedh 6mo ago
> You understand this after you start using it. Its just amazing people that people talk about Anthropic and have never used it.
81.
by sumedh 6mo ago
So Google allowed publishing the Attention paper because they didn't understand its value.
82.
by sumedh 6mo ago
> including the option to acquire Anthropic. I have feeling that Dario is not the type of man who would want to be acquired and then have Google's CEO telling him what to do.
83.
by sumedh 6mo ago
Anthropic seems to be doing fine :)
84.
by sumedh 6mo ago
Why pay for two subscriptions though? Claude also has other models which use less tokens.
85.
by sumedh 6mo ago
People are using them for creating marketing material for their business.
86.
by sumedh 6mo ago
Why not? Earlier you needed expert Photoshop skills to create fake images now anyone can do it.
87.
by sumedh 6mo ago
Isn't their argument that third party harness dont play nice with their GPUs which is a fair argument. With Claude Code they can predict what the traffic would look like with third party harness they cannot.
88.
by sumedh 6mo ago
Have you used Windows?
89.
by sumedh 6mo ago
Isnt Mollie Europe only?
90.
by sumedh 6mo ago
GPT 5.4 in Codex is good enough now. Try it.

More ›