subway

65 ms·

1. 601.▲
   by subway 10y ago

   Such douchebaggery.
2. 602.▲
   by subway 10y ago

   Because all the funds we earmark for public safety are gobbled up by lowlife middlefolk and their cronies, the snake oil salefolk. Look at our defense spend, and compare it with the pitiful recompense seen by the people we expose to risk.
3. 603.▲
   by subway 10y ago

   You're assuming rule makers are technically savvy.
4. 604.▲
   by subway 10y ago

   I'd argue the chances China cares about Tor being used to attack US based firms is an order of magnitude lower than when it is used to circumvent HR restrictions. If Tor is marketed as a general anonymity tool, it seems less likely to
5. 605.▲
   by subway 10y ago

   Sure, Tor traffic has always been suspicious, but that suspicious traffic has traditionally been without an attached political label. By branding Tor as a tool specifically for HR campaigns, you risk drawing additional ire from regimes cons
6. 606.▲
   by subway 10y ago

   EOMA68 goes a long ways to providing this sort of thing for general purpose machines (laptops/desktops). https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68/micro-desktop
7. 607.▲
   by subway 10y ago

   I think the en vogue term for us is "Tech Bro", at least in Seattle that seems to be the case.
8. 608.▲
   by subway 10y ago

   Docker Inc. is the poster child of the cathedral.
9. 609.▲
   by subway 10y ago

   You're not wrong, Walter.
10. 610.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    That isn't an easy problem to solve. What do you do when a company has a large set of numbers on a single trunk? Do you maintain a list of authorized CID source numbers? How do you enable 3rd parties to make calls on your behalf?
11. 611.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Not to nitpick, but I'm fairly certain that when using mount units, systemd is directly calling mount(2), eschewing use of mount(8). edit: I also want to say until somewhat recently, systemd's mount units were just a wrapper aroun
12. 612.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Maybe you should switch to one of the new plans? Currently it looks like what you describe is $35/mo: http://www.verizonwireless.com/landingpages/verizon-plan/
13. 613.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    If you have a limited number of devices, or use a lot of data, Verizon beats out Project Fi -- Fi shines when you have multiple devices (in my case, phone, tablet, laptop) with modems, and don't want to pay a $10/device/mo ac
14. 614.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    So, $15/mo extra for packets to originate from a device other than your phone. Another $25/mo for "HD Video" (That is, if you pay $25, Uncle Legere won't take your TCP connection out back and bust it's knee-cap
15. 615.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Sure, in theory, but I've struggled to find a single example of such an implementation. It seems like you either have to delegate authN to your chat service, with authZ handled by hubot-auth, or find a way to get your chat client to pa
16. 616.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Right.. The moment you allow Slack/Hipchat to vouch for your identity, you've effectively delegated control of your infrastructure -- an attack on Slack/Hipchat becomes a vector into your infrastructure.
17. 617.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    So, I see more and more organizations using "chatops". Are they really delegating control of their infrastructure out to Slack/HipChat? If not, how does authentication/authorization work?
18. 618.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Load balancing? Heh, that's a good one. My experience with hosting in the boom consisted of mostly first ip-based, then name-based vhosted Apache, maybe a per-vhost, but often per-system cgi-bin, and if you're lucky, mod_php. Gene
19. 619.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    I think this is a great example. Walk on red -- just be aware of your surroundings and responsible for the outcome when you do.
20. 620.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    They don't need to. Private industry has shown time and again that the device will remain insecure until consumers care (that is, indefinitely).
21. 621.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    I grew up on DOS and Windows, and never felt that way. The console was always for when I ran into limitations imposed by whatever GUI I was in.
22. 622.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Wow, this author is clueless. This is a mishmash list of tools with several misunderstandings about what they do.
23. 623.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Please don't conflate Apple's "Can you read a message we sent you?" verification with well designed 2FA.
24. 624.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    No one will believe your claim of consistent reliable service without proof. The taxi industry has fucked its own reputation quite thoroughly.
25. 625.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    When you fuck over your employees to do so, yes, yes you should be slammed.
26. 626.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    But how does one earn hipster cred without re-implementing battle-tested tools in go?
27. 627.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    I still have an old NT 4(?) install disc with x86, MIPS, Alpha, and PPC arches.
28. 628.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Out of curiosity, was it a Thinkpad, or some other Lenovo? I've had a fantastic experience (though I did shell out the $100 up front for 3 years of NBD On-site support)
29. 629.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Marketing sites often provide contact information for your organization. A MITM on your marketing site means Mallory can alter your contact details and potentially intercept your communications. This is one reason to enable HTTPS on your ma
30. 630.▲
    by subway 10y ago

    Free side channel attacks.