subscribed

4 ms·

31.
by subscribed 24d ago
It's maybe $250 for someone's old phone. Other than that -- next year. And this is other companies' choice, not GrapheneOS team, to fix on releasing grossly insecure hardware or NOT releasing patches and fixes.
32.
by subscribed 24d ago
> Messaging, high impact. Messaging can be replaced with one of the hundreds decent messaging apps. Unlike the backup app which is utterly unusable, untrustworthy and frankly crap. And CANNOT be replaced by anything else. As it stands it
33.
by subscribed 24d ago
What? :) You mean the perfectly functional (if barebones) AOSP call app? :)
34.
by subscribed 25d ago
Investigated, prosecuted and jailed (if necessary). So all the people companies are better off, not just you and other shareholders. You know, the opposite of two-tier justice system.
35.
by subscribed 26d ago
In the longstanding tradition of leading on the forefront safety, we introduce Engine Check coming up after mysterious, unaccounted for, unsigned voltage drops. Can't be too safe if it could be a short, right? "Tinkerer mode"
36.
by subscribed 26d ago
Thank you very much, that was so easy to understand, it'll genuinely help me. Thanks again.
37.
by subscribed 26d ago
That one is on me — I failed to take into consideration the limitations that you put in plain in front of me. This won't happen again.
38.
by subscribed 27d ago
That'd be even better TBF, thanks for the update
39.
by subscribed 27d ago
Hm. If these glasses can run custom software maybe they could even start recording automatically? :)
40.
by subscribed 27d ago
That's a massive difference to me (you rightly called me out on that one). One is 5 seconds on wifi, second is grumbly attempts to create throwaway email to create the throwaway account. I agree in principle but disagree because I hate
41.
by subscribed 27d ago
You won't see GOS on the $100 ever, because they don't contain the hardware GOS relies on. It simply won't work. Of course you can fork it, adapt and run the less safe clone, but the official GOS won't. ...unless you acc
42.
by subscribed 27d ago
Which things you'd say are very suspicious? And "they are suddenly very AI obsessed" sounds so alarming - can you point to something I could read?
43.
by subscribed 27d ago
This reads shockingly bad, but most of that won't apply to the new devices. Like, it will be Qualcomm, it will support unlockng , relocking, custom keys and will not have a secret debug key - otherwise there simply would be absolutely
44.
by subscribed 27d ago
connection != account You can do the Pixel unlocking whilst driving by the random McD. I'm quite surprised it flies with the team.
45.
by subscribed 27d ago
Kind of not like this. I mean the coat on my brick wall (and ideally roof), that will reflect most of the infrared and UV. I've used a white paint like this on the conservatory and white walls outside, and along with a solar-reflective
46.
by subscribed 28d ago
Window blinds for the worst hours (can be angled so the sun doesn't enter but the view outside is retained), and solar reflective foil for the normal days. I'm still looking for the good, transparent matte coat for my exterior wa
47.
by subscribed 28d ago
And having to restore everything (this is a house with personal items, not a loaner, anonymous flat) if someone trashes it? Naah, even a small risk is unacceptable in such case.
48.
by subscribed 29d ago
Yay! Finally, been waiting for it for ages. Maybe they'll work on the backup now, this *** seedvault is worse than nothing (consistently broken on both my GOS phones, never giving the same results with 2 backups, never giving out as mu
49.
by subscribed 1mo ago
Terrible. No malware / trackers / ad blocking on 9999. I hope at least they'll keep these options in their tunnel configuration but if not there's not much sense in keeping their service....
50.
by subscribed 1mo ago
Remember their new algorithm also prefers and promotes Spotify's own tracks they don't have to pay any royalties for and the slop. Related: https://bedrocknews.com/article/technology/2026/apr/11
51.
by subscribed 1mo ago
Huh, that one is funnier than I thought it could be. There's absolutely no love for Google in the GOS crowd. None at all. Now quick TL;DR so you can't pretend you missed something: - It seems that GOS will support the new, secure
52.
by subscribed 1mo ago
At the moment there is no other hardware manufacturer making similarly secure android phones. *NONE* There is no android hardware coming close. If there is, please name it. As far as I know it's only some unspecified, upcoming Motorola
53.
by subscribed 1mo ago
There are devices meeting these basic standards right now, and the entire family of them, no less. GOS are vocal about safety and security of all the devices, not just seriously insecure Fairphones, and this article is about something diffe
54.
by subscribed 1mo ago
More like class action lawsuit, $500m settlement, $300m for lawyers and $0.50 for every victim.
55.
by subscribed 1mo ago
This is such a fine sarcasm, chef's kiss!
56.
by subscribed 1mo ago
Isn't where all the Nazis go? :)
57.
by subscribed 1mo ago
It was never intended to work. Fake reasoning, classic lies, rejecting any measured critique. It's a heavy boot of the authoritarian regime in the door.
58.
by subscribed 1mo ago
Why is that _weird_? That implies recorded data / measurements going against the proven and tested theories, or the _design_.
59.
by subscribed 1mo ago
And this, dear Watson, is why we never use Google services for anything serious. And we tell our children the same.
60.
by subscribed 1mo ago
> Google and Apple should be legally mandated to federate with nation state identity systems. With which states? I'm I'm a citizen of two and live in the third, potentially having eSIM of the fourth?

More ›