stupidbird

11 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by stupidbird 8y ago

   Google/Facebook and others know how long you look at a specific post/ad/video/etc and knows who you're with, even when in a private residence. If you're in someone's house on their wifi network and they&#x
2. 92.▲
   by stupidbird 8y ago

   Note that unless you're explicitly blocking it — you're giving away much more information when you shop online than with facial recognition in a physical store. Cash is one of the last remaining bastions of true transactional priv
3. 93.▲
   by stupidbird 8y ago

   Of course value-based CoCs are fine. The problem with this isn't the content, it's the fact that they're using the content because they fundamentally disagree with codes of conduct.
4. 94.▲
   by stupidbird 8y ago

   This says more of "we're lazy and don't actually care to do this seriously" more than it says anything in good faith.
5. 95.▲
   by stupidbird 8y ago

   They own and maintain the data, so it's not that outrageous. It's a bit more transparent than someone like Twitter, who for a time let anyone use their API... and then just pulled the rug out from under it.
6. 96.▲
   by stupidbird 8y ago

   Having a code of conduct isn't about creating rules, it's about making a public commitment to enforce them. Now that they've shown us that they clearly don't care about a code of conduct, I wouldn't trust them to ev