strzibny

18 ms·

181.
Ask HN: How do you record and edit (programming) videos on Linux?
26 points by strzibny 5y ago|15 comments
182.
by strzibny 5y ago
I chose NGINX as a web server in my book, because if you don't know what to use, use NGINX. Thanks Igor for all your work!
183.
by strzibny 5y ago
Nice to see Gunicorn here. While it's modelled after Ruby's Unicorn, it's actually bit more capable as it supports the multi-process & multi-thread execution model. It even supports ASGI by specifying a particular Uvicorn
184.
Single attribute in-place editing with Rails and Turbo(nts.strzibny.name)
1 points by strzibny 5y ago|0 comments
185.
by strzibny 5y ago
That sounds like a horrible place to work!
186.
by strzibny 5y ago
I have never been part of the team that did daily standups (& I led one of the teams). I am happy for that. You don't need to do daily standups just because most dev teams do.
187.
by strzibny 5y ago
General email server? No, I would be worried too. But I think you can set up an email server for your own tasks, like sending yourself some notifications. It's also nice to know how this works in theory. These are the reasons I inc
188.
by strzibny 5y ago
I have a license because I have a thing for speed and feel of Sublime. There is nothing like it. I write my Ruby and Elixir code with it, even if I know I get better experience with other tools. I wrote my book Deployment from Scratch with
189.
by strzibny 5y ago
I think most people do modularize monoliths. There are Phoenix contexts and Rails engines that provide a good starting point, for example. After working with Phoenix I am actually thinking of bringing the idea of contexts to Rails applicati
190.
by strzibny 5y ago
> My only wish it was simpler to host I think it can be simple if you keep it simple :). In my book Deployment from Scratch I show people how to run Rails on a cheap VPS with a couple hundreds lines of Bash. Just Ruby + chruby + Puma + s
191.
by strzibny 5y ago
I agree, felt the same and happy now!
192.
by strzibny 5y ago
> Ruby, with its runtime, is complex and hard to build and deploy and host. Heroku et al take that away from you, but "getting it running on your laptop" alone is a sysyphian task. Is it? And compared to what? I don't thin
193.
by strzibny 5y ago
Excellent post. > Sheds are never finished. You just decide you are done. This is what everybody should take from this. It's easy to iterate over and over again. And btw your (unfinished) shed looks pretty good!
194.
by strzibny 5y ago
If someone is interested, I did the Django tutorial app commit by commit (and then upgraded to Django 4)[0]. [0] https://github.com/deployment-from-scratch/django-2.2-polls
195.
by strzibny 5y ago
If someone is calling me a cheater and a liar, I will at least say they are wrong.
196.
by strzibny 5y ago
This looks like a good comparison. A lot of comparisons online are way superficial or plain wrong.
197.
by strzibny 5y ago
Love it, best of the tiny projects so far;)
198.
by strzibny 5y ago
There is not one single way to do deployments, and what you suggest leads people to vendor lock-ins, rather than the ability to self-host things on their own hardware later on (or if necessary). What I teach is actually a good approach for
199.
by strzibny 5y ago
If you have more actionable advise for me, I am all ears. It's my first book, after all.
200.
by strzibny 5y ago
> it's clearly not organic here. And yet it's 100% organic here. I was few times on the HN frontpage with my blog (that links my book) so I was hoping some of my readers actually hang out here. I postponed Show HN a few months
201.
by strzibny 5y ago
Ahh thank you so much. I hope you'll like it.
202.
by strzibny 5y ago
The main idea is building a single server deployment in a secure and maintainable way... and then possibly taking it to 5-10 servers at which point the Bash-only approach is less than ideal (but possible). Then you can pick a better tool of
203.
by strzibny 5y ago
The pricetag doesn't reflect just the PDF, though. If you deploy your own database with the demo, you might save way more money in a year. Other similar resources include less and charge more, or do you know one that's better valu
204.
by strzibny 5y ago
Would you be interested in giving it a read in exchange for your feedback? I might be open to that (DM me https://twitter.com/strzibnyj ). I already lost more then one year of earnings working on the book and I couldn't
205.
by strzibny 5y ago
Yes, because: 1. It's popular and well understood. 2. It's included in the distribution and enjoys security fixes. 3. It's included in the distribution and shipped with good SELinux profile. 4. Since I use it to explain rever
206.
by strzibny 5y ago
I mention both, but don't go into detail. Ad 12-factor. Some makers are better off not to follow everything. For example, it's fine to use server disk space for a single server. So I don't want to include it as dogma. Ad CI&#
207.
by strzibny 5y ago
This. The book was called Deployment for Makers before, but I am taking it in a more general direction now. I wrote about some of the things mentioned above, but had to choose where I spend the time (it's already a long book). There is
208.
by strzibny 5y ago
No problem, I know where you are coming from. I regularly get spammed with "we are not PH" and "we are on HN" posts from people I don't even know, and the hard truth is that for lot of these "marketers" it
209.
by strzibny 5y ago
Thank you!
210.
by strzibny 5y ago
Do people actually deploy on Windows? (It's a joke, but as a Red Hat guy I yet have to see it in real life to believe it.) My last Windows was XP, but I actually use Azure at work right now. If you want to mostly do cloudy things (use

More ›