Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
strulovich
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
strulovich
4y ago
Bezos paid $250M for WaPo, for an old fashioned thing. Musk is paying $44B, 176 times more. Seems different.
92.
▲
by
strulovich
4y ago
For an analogy who went all the way up to the Supreme Court see: https://news.artnet.com/market/arne-svenson-neighbors-photog...
93.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
Beware the survivability bias: Maybe big companies can be destroyed by sales and marketing is just the observation resulting from small companies never getting to become big ones due to lack of good sales and marketing.
94.
▲
Instagram Adds Parental Controls
(about.fb.com)
2 points
by
strulovich
5y ago
|
0 comments
95.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
Looks like they might go away as Amazon merges the technology into Whole Foods: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/28/technology/whole-foods-am... (Sorry for paywalled article)
96.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
I avoid cable television and ads. But once in a while I’ll see them on a screen in a bar and they really grab my attention. I think not being exposed to ads, is actually slightly dangerous, since you don’t get used to ignoring them. When I
97.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
But you need a FB account it page to actually tag someone, no?
98.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
> I don't understand why I'm supposed to believe that Facebook would ever have beneficial insight to add to a privacy standard or that it would ever do anything other than try to weaken the standard. I don’t think that’s why yo
99.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
I’m not saying there’s no single issue voters, just that the single issues are not universal and depend on culture and geography.
100.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
Those single issue voters are the not present in many other countries besides the US. This might show that the right arguments and lobbying can turn what is not a big political debate into a wedge over time.
101.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
Part of the issue is the language. Apple used the “ask no to track language”, but when it came to their own services chose “turn off personalized ads”: https://9to5mac.com/2021/09/02/apple-personalized-ads-tar
102.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
The author seems to have mostly stumbled upon the old “time is money” adage. People today have much more money (or purchasing power) than pre industrial people. They have the same amount of time. There’s a big consequence to your behaviors
103.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
>> we actually use discrete math, where we deal exclusively with non-continuous numbers. This includes things like graph theory, logic, and combinatorics. You might not realize that you are using these, but you do. They’re just so int
104.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
Meta’s (Facebook) acquisition of Giphy got blocked by European regulators iirc.
105.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
Amen to the idea. - Prefer real objects, or fakes over mocks. It will make your tests usually more robust. - Use mocks when you must: to avoid networking, or other flaky things such as storage. - Use mocks for “output only objects”, for exa
106.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
The first person is working electric aviation (but their website mentions military uses alongside the usual medical aid ones - point for honesty?) Another one is about small scale nuclear reactors. So it this just about the term? It the peo
107.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
This calculation is wrong. While the average 77 years old person will live 10.2 years, it’s not founded and unlikely the people dying from Covid at that age are distributed uniformly. Most likely a 77 yo dying of Covid is in worse health an
108.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
Interestingly, the author mentions people lose focus after 10-18 minutes anyhow. So maybe speeding up things gets them more information during that initial focus time? (Other than this silly note, I generally agree with a lot of the author’
109.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
I’ve recently had a smoked trout sausage dish in a restaurant. It was amazing, and really hit the textures of a sausage with a great twist on the flavor. There’s definitely potential.
110.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
Genetics are much more complicated than that. Processes like recombination means there’s much more options to mix and match genes.
111.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
My personal experience shows to the contrary, the super talented engineers do well, and get promoted much more easily. And I’ve seen many cases of “run-of-the-mill engineers” change cultural aspects of the office and the company. This is al
112.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
For me it’s the following: - going for polymorphic classes instead of a few switches can cause bad coupling of knowledge. ( For example, instead of a switch on what to log in module A and the same for module B, now you’re mixing code from
113.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
When I started using Spotify (it back then Rdio for a while) it would end an album and start playing another, and it would surface top albums easily. This result in getting me to listening to full albums as my main style of listening to mus
114.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
For the majority of my studies I took notes in Word and it’s equation editor (LaTeX syntax is most of what you need to know for it) It was great for sharing and searching notes, but definitely challenging. Once in a while when a diagram was
115.
▲
How Instagram and Twitter Buried the Hatchet
(theverge.com)
5 points
by
strulovich
5y ago
|
0 comments
116.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
I’m pretty sure it was only applied on Facebook friends posts, ideally those are not strangers.
117.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
Who are some of those experts in your opinion? Sounds like an interesting read perhaps.
118.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
I don’t think even Apple passes this test though. (And I do consider Apple to much better privacy wise than other big tech)
119.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
I’m sorry if my tone is not coming across as I intended. I think there’s plenty of arguments to be made against Facebook’s integrity effort, and plenty of that work happened on Guy Rosen’s shift. But your feedback is not nuanced and seems t
120.
▲
by
strulovich
5y ago
So it’s a linguistic issue. You’re lumping integrity as “do people abuse our system” with “does person A follow the same morals as me”. Specifically, looks like your morals are that products that are free in exchange for anonymously analyzi
More ›