Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
strcat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
56 ms
·
631.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
I don't think a highly insecure OS not shipping privacy/security updates for months is even a reasonable choice for people who don't care much about privacy and security. Their site presents standard Android privacy/secu
632.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
You can speed up app launching by turning off the optional exec-based spawning feature. Our camera app also has a Latency mode which recently became the default instead of Quality mode. Google and Apple camera apps essentially always use so
633.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
The thread you're linking explains why we developed sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer for better privacy, security and far broader app compatibility. On an OS using microG, you still have the Google Play code running in each of
634.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
GrapheneOS developed our sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer to provide support for running Google Play as regular apps in the full standard app sandbox. They work like any other apps and can't do anything that a regular user ins
635.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
GrapheneOS is a hardened OS. It not only preserves the whole standard privacy and security model including all the hardware-based security features but also substantially improves it. https://grapheneos.org/features provide
636.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
GrapheneOS has the sandboxed Google Play compatibility layer. Most banking apps work fine on GrapheneOS. Certain banking/financial services check for a Google certified OS via remote attestation. SafetyNet attestation is deprecated and
637.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
You've repeatedly engaged in harassing me and spreading fabricated stories about me. Your community comes to most of these threads and does this. It's getting old.
638.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
They don't know much about it and haven't used it. CalyxOS isn't a hardened OS and isn't at all comparable to GrapheneOS. They recently didn't even ship half the baseline Android security patches for 2 months, let a
639.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
> camera app blocked via firewall So you are using a Google app (Google Camera) in an objectively much weaker sandbox than the one provided by GrapheneOS. You're giving it shared storage access since it requires it and CalyxOS doesn
640.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
GrapheneOS supports running Google Play as regular fully sandboxed apps without any special privileges and without the OS using them as the backend for anything. It has near 100% Play Store app compatibility when using sandboxed Google Play
641.
▲
by
strcat
4y ago
Android is heavily adopting Rust. They rewrote the Bluetooth stack, hardware keystore HAL, etc. in Rust and new components like virtualization are heavily using it. This is also behind the effort to get official Rust support in the Linux ke
642.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
You're directly participating in the abusive behavior spreading a libellous video with a bunch of fabrications from a drama seeking sociopath on YouTube. You're even using Kiwi Farms language yourself. Try not being an asshole and
643.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
> To be fair, the lead dev of graphene os has been crying wolf about stuff like this for ages. We aren't crying wolf. The abusive behavior has been ongoing since 2018. It wasn't happening in any significant way from 2014 throug
644.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
Nick has repeatedly got involved in spreading libel and misinformation about GrapheneOS in the past few days and has encouraged the people raiding our rooms. At most he has asked them not to do this in their rooms, while making it clear tha
645.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
Nick and you are both openly involved in bullying and libel targeting me along with spreading misinformation about your product and our project to benefit yourselves. This has been a consistent behavior from both of you for a long time. You
646.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
You're claiming no mods were around when Nicolas Merrill was right there in the middle of the conversation? It's blatantly not true. Screenshot is here for everyone to see: https://twitter.com/DanielMicay/stat
647.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
> I'd pick Calyx over privacy grounds not Graphene. (I totally agree that Graphene beats anyone on security grounds by miles, and depending on your threat model, security could be related to your privacy) CalyxOS is substantially le
648.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
CalyxOS recently went almost 4 months without shipping Chromium (including WebView) and Android security updates. CalyxOS is not "degoogled" and uses multiple Google services by default without an opt-out. Look at their documentat
649.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
AOSP Camera can't use them but GrapheneOS ships with a Camera app that's able to use all the cameras and a lightweight variant of HDR+. Google Camera can also be used on GrapheneOS simply by installing GSF and Google Camera. Netwo
650.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
> By default, Calyx is privacy-preserving, because it doesn't connect automatically to WiFi. You choose to connect to WiFi only if you want to. Going to simply interpret this as unhelpful sarcasm. > My point is that the comment I
651.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
It's a video pushing a whole bunch of clearly fabricated stories and libel about me. The leader of the Calyx Institute and multiple project members have also participated in this abusive behavior. They've tried to pretend as if th
652.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
It's a video pushing a whole bunch of clearly fabricated stories and libel about me. The leader of the Calyx Institute and multiple project members have also participated in this abusive behavior. They've tried to pretend as if th
653.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
> Purism says that it went way over-budget trying to develop the Librem 5 and its software, which is why it has been raising its prices. Considering the roughly 20 companies that lost their shirts in the past when trying to develop mobil
654.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
> I was simply following the standard convention of saying "Linux" to mean the entire OS that is found in popular distros like Debian, Arch and Fedora, whereas people generally say "Linux kernel" to refer to just the
655.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
> It has everything to do with things being closed source. Try doing a Linux kernel major version upgrade with binary-only drivers for key components sometime. It sounds like the only reason GrapheneOS works is because they're '
656.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
I don't see what you're doing as engaging in good faith, and I don't see any use in further discussion. Seeing the same inaccurate talking points over and over attacking GrapheneOS only makes us see Purism and their community
657.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
> If you are talking about kernel hardening and running each app in its own sandbox with its own UID, then I would agree that Android/AOSP has more security features than Debian/PureOS, but the problem with your argument is tha
658.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
> Care to provide any evidence to prove that Purism or its employees are "spreading tons of misinformation and outright lies about the mainstream options"? Since you're doing that yourself, I don't think engaging with
659.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
Please read https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30761693 and the other comments again. Librem 5 has incredibly poor hardware/firmware security and it isn't possible for us to work around that at a software level.
660.
▲
by
strcat
5y ago
It's immensely frustrating for us (GrapheneOS) because we desperately want more devices to support but the devices supposedly focused on privacy/security are really massive setbacks for it. We want to convince vendors with the res
More ›