strawpeople

11 ms·

31.
by strawpeople 4y ago
What’s wrong with his disclaimer?
32.
by strawpeople 4y ago
Think deferent.
33.
by strawpeople 4y ago
> Behringer who are effectively wrecking their business model By making knock offs without needing to do the R&D and product-market fit work for themselves. Why isn’t there a knock-off of the op-1?
34.
by strawpeople 4y ago
> I talk about this stuff because I enjoy making music Nothing about your comments in this thread convey enjoyment of music making. Instead you just seem to be expressing contempt for the op-1, it’s makers, and the people who do enjoy
35.
by strawpeople 4y ago
> I see it on someone's desk and assume that they have too much time and money on their hands. Surely it’s suited to someone who is price insensitive but has too little time to take music seriously. Why shouldn’t there be a produ
36.
by strawpeople 4y ago
This makes sense. I think that there is no API available to access this data. I thought that you were referring to them rejecting the app at the review stage. I don’t see any reason they would do that or disapprove of the purpose of the ap
37.
by strawpeople 4y ago
What’s so wrong with a cool looking toy? Once upon a time I worked a full time stressful job at a startup and was well paid. I didn’t have a lot of time for hobbies, but an op-1 would have been a great way to play around with music. I’d ha
38.
by strawpeople 4y ago
> it's unlikely Apple would approve the functionality of the app I see no reason this would be true. What rule do you think it violates?