stpedgwdgfhgdd

29 ms·

91.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Pro was not sufficient when i started to: Use git worktrees, type every command in plain english in CC. For example “commit and push”
92.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
In my experience using small steps and a lot of automated tests work very well with CC. Don’t go for these huge prompts that have a complete feature in it. Remember the title “attention is all you need”? Well you need to pay a lot of atte
93.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
In my experience for enterprise software engineering, in this stage we are able to shrink the coding time with ~20%, depending on the kind of code/tests. However CICD remains tricky. In fact when AI agents start building autonomous, me
94.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Just asked CC to create a work tree and branch. (Space was a typo) What did it do? Just a branch… You cant trust LLMs for 100%, constant supervision is needed
95.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
I asked Chatgpt whether this was a joke. And asked Claude and Le chat for confirmation.
96.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
There is a trend to write tools on the spot. Should be easy, right? So during a big Go refactoring I asked Claude to write a python script to do some renames. I hoped it would be faster, more reliable and save some tokens. Well that was a r
97.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
+1. Some refactorings are important but just not urgent enough compared to features. Letting CC do these refactorings makes quite a difference. At least in the case of lot of automated test coverage and typed language (Go) so it can work in
98.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
It definitely takes a lot of experience writing code with a LLM. Like a junior engineer it makes tons of (small) mistakes. It takes years of practice to detect the LLM is introducing small bugs that will reveal themselves only after extensi
99.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
“The goal of software engineering is not to write code faster” Writing proper code including tests and refactorings takes substantial time. It is definitely worth it to do this faster, if only to get faster feedback to go back to the first
100.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
I do something similar, but the problem is that claude.md keeps on growing. To tackle this, I converted a custom prompt into an application, but there is an interesting trade-off. The application is deterministic. It cannot deal with unknow
101.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Just a matter of time before AI coding becomes commodity and prices drop. 2027
102.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Pro is fine for medium sized projects, stick to 1 terminal.
103.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
“We typically making very very detailed plans” - this is writing code in English without tests. Admittedly, since generating code is faster, you get faster feedback. Still, I do not think it as efficient as an incremental, test driven appro
104.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Probably worth it as most people read HN on tablet or phone. What is potentially a problem is the lack of training material for AI agents to generate games on top of this platform.
105.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
I noticed that i hardly look anymore at the generated Go code… I do give a lot of attention to the tests. I let CC write some failing tests, implement. Let it run against some real scenarios. Find bugs, let it write more tests, fix. And ite
106.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Same experience. One terminal window with Pro is okay. Multiple CC running in parallel not. We most likely implement a policy that starters in our company can use Pro. Power users need Max.
107.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Use TDD so CC can converge. I see people tuning a prompt, that is fun, not software engineering.
108.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
(bit off topic, but I wished someone told me this a few months ago; for regular programming generation, use TDD and a type safe language like Go. (Fast compile times and excellent testing support). Don’t aim for the magical huge waterfall p
109.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
I’m programming software development workflows for Claude in plain english (custom commands). The non-deterministic is indeed a (tiny!) bit of a problem, but just tell Claude to improve the command so next time it won’t make the same mistak
110.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
When using a single terminal Pro is good enough (even with a medium-large code base). When I started working with two terminals at two different issues at the same time, i’m reaching the credit limit.
111.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Another JS implementation… I do not get it why they don’t pick Go or Rust so i get a binary.
112.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Fwiiw I noticed that CC’s generated Go code nowadays is very solid. No hallucination recently that i can remember or struck me. I do see youtube videos of people working with js/ts still struggling with this. Which is odd, there is way
113.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Probably not a popular take on HN; valuable information should not be hidden in commits but in comments. Especially the WHY is crucial to write down in comments. I’m fine that people squash as long the reasoning is recorded in comments and
114.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
The recent developments are impressive. I’m now using my IDE as a diff viewer. Everything goes through the terminal. If there is an error, CC can analyse and fix it. Still needs a lot of handholding. I do not (yet) think big upfront plans
115.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Don’t get fully the use-cases this tool solves except for some auto-accept. You would also expect some eat-your-own-dog-food, why does https://github.com/possibilities/claude-composer/blob/main/s... not
116.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
Bit of topic, but worth sharing; Yesterday was for me a milestone, i connected Claude Code through MCP with Jira (sse). I asked it to create a plan for a specific Jira issue, ah, excuse me, work item. CC created the plan based on the item’s
117.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 1y ago
“This is unusual — did your boss ever have to send you a memo demanding that you use a smartphone?” AI has the promise to optimize worker’s efficiency x-fold. This promise was not the case with smartphones, slack, etc. And AI will change ev
118.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 2y ago
Suggestion: Integrate with https://kgateway.dev/
119.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 2y ago
Oh man, a complete new industry is to about to unfold. I already feel sorry for the people that jump on the latest remote mcp server and discover that their entire personal life (“what is your biggest anxiety?”) is on the streets
120.
by stpedgwdgfhgdd 2y ago
The language that does not have room for mistakes cannot be used by humans.

More ›