Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
stonogo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
481.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Just noting for the record that Openoffice has tons of security problems and no development happening. Apache won't retire the project because they have some kind of MBA-brained theory that the 'brand' is worth misleading pe
482.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
I'm not going to claim it was fun, but it sure beat using one of those standalone nav calculators!
483.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
It's more common for state governments to join forces to define standards for data, performance, features, and interoperability, and then require contractors to comply in the contract language. I'm not aware of many contracts for
484.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
I don't think anyone in that space really worries about being replaced by AI, because it's not really up to the task of replacing anyone.
485.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Part of the point of making claims -- and defending them -- in a public forum is that many more people than "the other person" get to read them. You claimed "decades" of research, and when asked where it is, mentioned o
486.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Would that be Joshua Dean or John Barnett?
487.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
It depends on the contract. In the DOE system it's usually national lab employees working under direct funding; in that case the operating contractor retains copyright. In the DOD world it's more common for development to be act
488.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
It's 17 USC 105. Most agencies work around it by hiring contractors, which then leaves the copyright in the hands of the contractor. It's a loophole I'd like to see closed.
489.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
That's already the rule, but the DoD is the only agency who takes it seriously (examples are BRLCAD and FalconView). This doesn't stop unscrupulous contractors from copyrighting code and charging license fees (see: most DoE code,
490.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Because Amazon sent them am email. When questions go unanswered, Amazon emails some of the prior purchasers asking them the question. These emails are constructed to look like they are personally being asked for help. So, why? Courtesy,
491.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
You could have just said 'no'.
492.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
And they standardized MTA-STS to ensure that you must use web technologies if you want to use email.
493.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
This was why Henry Ford paid a decent wage. It turns out to reduce labor costs due to turnover dropping and less time spent training workers.
494.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Those prices are pretty famously lower in European nations with higher minimum wages.
495.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Or someone who has no idea how legislation works. The idea that all the "more important issues" take the same amount of time and effort to tackle is invalid; this is an achievable goal and one relatively easy to gather consensus.
496.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Nobody in the 80s wanted to pay the overhead of s-exprs when a couple of colons did the job. Bandwidth and memory were limited.
497.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Which of these requirements is, in your opinion, unreasonable?
498.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
The article holds clues: "Information he held was expected to play a key part in lawsuits against the San Francisco-based company."
499.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Advocating, in other words, the creation of a sort of Automattic for the People
500.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Can it run a vanilla kernel or is it nailed forever to Sifive's Dev team?
501.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Sure, but this library contains none of the contents of any of those headers, so it still doesn't apply here
502.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Sounds like a skill issue. People do it every day.
503.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
I don't know why the down votes here... Maybe the last question? POSIX mandates various header files; it is not possible to implement a single-header library in a POSIX compliant manner. Plus this library implements the ANSI c standard
504.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
This argument is weak. Editorials are marked as such. The board makeup is known. Tiktok is a platform wherein its impossible to know which content is organically popular and what is being artificially weighted, we have no insight into who
505.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
When your business is cost control on human life, it's not surprising that decency goes out the door. Also the media seem to have settled on "Citi Bike Assassin."
506.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Walmart also pays workers so little that its employees receive over six billion dollars in public aid: https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/04/15/report-... A significant cost savings.
507.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Might have been easier to read if it weren't buried in AI slop.
508.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
This is all great, but how can we trust this will be supported next year? After Xeon Phi, Omnipath, and a host of other killed projects, Intel is approaching Google levels of mean time to deprecation.
509.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Those packages only really perform with low-precision work. For scientific computing, using anything but CUDA is a painful workflow. DOE has been deploying AMD and Intel alternatives in their leadership class machines and it's been a
510.
▲
by
stonogo
2y ago
Lingo of the era was "cassette tape" -- and for a while there "cassette" by itself could mean anything packaged in a small case. "Cartridge" in my youth far more often referred to ammunition than a video game
More ›