stillhere

9 ms·

31.
by stillhere 9y ago
No one has time to examine every line of source code in the 3rd party applications that we use. That being said it irks me when people don't at least isolate their sensitive material. There are many solutions available including virtua
32.
by stillhere 9y ago
Everyone is obsessed with being a software engineer who writes code but I love QA and all it represents. I started off as a QA and now write code but the experience made me a better engineer than virtually everyone who did not start off wit
33.
by stillhere 9y ago
Even without the computer aided decision making program they say he would have been sentenced anyway but that's not the point. The point is every program has bugs and if you have a closed source program that wrongly decides the fate of
34.
by stillhere 9y ago
So anyone is free to believe whatever they like but if they'd like to join your organization they better shut up about it if they don't think the way you do? In effect you are policing thought.
35.
by stillhere 9y ago
Who decides what is intolerant? Free speech becomes more limited over time as the definition changes to anything which hurts someones feelings for example. Or, in this case, ascribes to BDSM and fantasy lifestyle. You are the thought police
36.
by stillhere 9y ago
I value free speech more than I value the system you're advocating. If "hate speech" is limited it becomes too easy to define anything you don't like as hate speech. Like Chronicles of Gor.
37.
by stillhere 9y ago
"We believe that tolerance reserved only for people who think and act exactly like we do is no tolerance at all." Oh my god. Then act like it.