Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sthu11182
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
sthu11182
10y ago
Litigation is much more expensive than that. Inter Partes Review and early summary judgment on 101 are the cheapest way to go in many circumstances. It is what is happening these days too.
32.
▲
by
sthu11182
10y ago
I would say that Judge Grewal is one of the most influential judges in patent law in the country. I am saddened that he left the bench.
33.
▲
Judge Grewal joins Facebook
(blogs.wsj.com)
1 points
by
sthu11182
10y ago
|
1 comments
34.
▲
by
sthu11182
11y ago
the only construction i see is in redwood city. the rest refuse to change.
35.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
So is outsourcing.
36.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
The example of VirnetX is interesting because it is "troll" in the eyes of many, but the patents it is suing on are from SAIC, with whom they are partnering with.
37.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
A few universities have started partnering up with law firms that will monetize their IP on contingency (presumably) to raise money for the university. It's a recent trend. Carnegie Mellon won a $1.5B verdict recently (though I think
38.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
Bankruptcy has bankruptcy district courts.
39.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
The regional circuits created a mess with patent law. Wasn't it the 7th circuit that never found a patent to be valid. 3M was justifiably upset about that. If forum shopping is bad now, think how it would be with regional circuit pat
40.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
A little more clarity on abstract ideas, but not much more
41.
▲
Supreme Court rules on software patent case Alice Corp v. CLS Bank [pdf]
(supremecourt.gov)
238 points
by
sthu11182
12y ago
|
110 comments
42.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
If the Fed Circuit reverses, it might be on the evidence, but that is a higher standard for reversal.
43.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
I don't think a significant portion of Native Americans find "Oklahoma" to be racist. (based on a guess, not based on any studies) The point of the ruling was a significant portions of Native Americans found "redskins&qu
44.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
The decision is not based on the dictionary definition only, but based on the fact 1/3 of Native Americans have consistently (based on the evidence presented) thought the term to be offensive. Oddly enough, one of the owners of the red
45.
▲
by
sthu11182
12y ago
Also, do your own initial search to see if anyone else has made this "invention." This may save you a lot of time and money. patents.google.com is a good place to start.
46.
▲
by
sthu11182
13y ago
Interesting question/answer JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: How about email and just word processing programs? MR. PERRY: At a point in time in the past, I think both of those would have been technological advances that were patentable. . . . Becau
47.
▲
Oral Arguments at Supreme Court for Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank
(patentlyo.com)
1 points
by
sthu11182
13y ago
|
1 comments
48.
▲
by
sthu11182
13y ago
With the Federal Circuit punting it to the Supreme Court, I don't they will leave it that vague. The Supreme Court does not like bright line rules for patents, I think they will come up with a balancing, multi-factor test.
49.
▲
by
sthu11182
13y ago
My point it is there can never be a Bell Labs again. Very few organizations have the resources to fund basic sciences and have all the talent they had under one roof. Some argue that you can again, but I just don't see how it is possi
50.
▲
by
sthu11182
13y ago
I think it is hard to top what AT&T did with Bell Labs. They had a government mandated monopoly with tons of money to fund basic scientific research and ended up with a few Nobel prizes in the process. I think the more apt organizatio
51.
▲
by
sthu11182
13y ago
I remember an old IEEE article on the NYC subway system. There were portions of the system that was built in the 1900's that still controls the tracks. The MTA was afraid of removing the old system because they had no idea how it wor
52.
▲
BU sues HP and LG
(bostinno.streetwise.co)
1 points
by
sthu11182
13y ago
|
0 comments
53.
▲
by
sthu11182
13y ago
“Once you go thug, though, you can’t unthug,” - true dat.
54.
▲
by
sthu11182
14y ago
I would agree. I think using Latex for a brief is likely to get a deputy clerk sending you a notice. District Courts will have local rules on formatting (with California having the oddest one I have seen yet).
55.
▲
by
sthu11182
14y ago
I was talking about the Federal Circuit specifically, but point taken.
56.
▲
by
sthu11182
14y ago
a good sample - http://patently-useless.tumblr.com/
57.
▲
by
sthu11182
14y ago
I think the most interesting thing right now at the Federal Circuit is the complete change in make up of the judges. I think President Obama has or will have appointed half of the court. In 2009, Justice Roberts stated at the Supreme Cour
58.
▲
by
sthu11182
14y ago
The Federal Circuit en banc decision on CLS Bank v. Alice is coming out soon. This case will likely give guidance on a 101 patent subject matter test for software patents (which the Supreme Court would then overrule). The certified questio
59.
▲
by
sthu11182
14y ago
Patents are extremely important for a startup generally (especially for getting funding from VCs). Not sure how much it affects funding in the software side of things (depending on what you actually do I would guess). Patents are helpful
60.
▲
by
sthu11182
14y ago
It is a little bit more complicated than that. Transferring out of EDTX has been easier since the Fed Cir granted mandamus in In re TS Tech and its progeny (which was based on a 5th Cir decision, In re Volkswagen). The case law is still d
More ›