Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
stephenr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
181.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
Well it's a good thing for you, someone just yesterday told me: > many other devices exist So use one of them?
182.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
Good for you champ.
183.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
"fake" or "thing you will create" is not an accurate description when you consider that it can be a directory (thus creating a new link within that directory that exists) or even omitted to use the current directory.
184.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> I don't see a meaningful distinction between a screen on a DIN unit and an integrated screen. Someone questioned why a car needs two 12" touch screens. To which you replied > Backup cameras are an enormous safety improveme
185.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
There are infinitely better ways to protect your car from being stolen than putting a fucking AirTag in it, and as a bonus you can buy all of them without sounding self-centred and flippant about real threats to other people.
186.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> the possibility of more performant software due to being able to write more code quicker This is sarcasm, right?
187.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
I think you'll find it's not so much about how likely the event is (stalking vs theft) as it is about the potential impact of the event. The things you want to "protect" with an invisible AirTag are, at their core "
188.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> one of these things that we never seemed to need until they told us we needed it Found the guy who literally never leaves his studio apartment and has thus never lost baggage, keys, etc.
189.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
I feel like you're deliberately missing the point. You don't need them to have a reversing camera. Literally millions of cars over the past 2 decades have perfectly fine reversing cameras using the screen of a regular double-DIN
190.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
What's that got to do with reversing cameras?
191.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
You don't need 'dual 12.3" touch screens' for a reversing camera.
192.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
Backup cameras are an enormous safety improvement. You know that a backup camera can be added to practically any car right? My ~2002 Toyota has a Pioneer deck from around 2007 (I guess?) that supports reversing camera input. My wifes 2012 T
193.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
A few years ago it came out that one of the manufacturers (my hunch is Samsung but I don't remember the specifics) had their "smart" tvs aggressively try connecting to any and all networks it can find in range, if you didn&#x
194.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
Cue obligatory Ralph Fiennes "You're an inanimate fucking object".
195.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
That isn't rubber duck debugging. It's just talking to someone about the problem. The entire point of rubber duck debugging is that the other side literally cannot respond - it's an inanimate object, or even a literal duck&
196.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> The direction of travel with MacOS itself is troubling. Ads, bugs, dark patterns. Where is macOS showing you ads? And what "dark patterns" are you referring to?
197.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
It's kind of disingenuous if not deliberately misleading to say > Otto Kekäläinen (former Software Development Manager at AWS) He also happens to have a past involvement with MariaDB foundation. Furthermore, his article about MySQL
198.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
macOS only does the downscaling step if you aren't using an exact 2x UI scale. If it's exact 2x it just renders the UI using double pixels (2x2 per simulated pixel) and then sends that over the wire.
199.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
Quite an ironic use of the word "fix" there.
200.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> It is like fast food, not every cares about farm to table I mean, a "colorful fat choncker" website is literally the opposite of fast food - its slower to arrive, and focuses way too much on appearances . In this analogy, th
201.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> a group of experts in simplicity and accessibility According to who? This alone is a pretty damning case against such a claim.
202.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
I mean, that much is obvious just based on casual reading of a few articles/discussions about "modern" front-end dev. I am 100% convinced that "Modern" front end developers are in fact, afraid of CSS and HTML. Like,
203.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
Look, do what works for you obviously but this just reinforces my view that the people who see "AI Code agents" as a useful thing, are the people who don't know how to write code themselves. For the same reason things like Im
204.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
My understanding is that HiDPI mode on Windows requires each app to specifically support it, no?
205.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
On macOS: crisper text.
206.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
GitHub is without question worse for users now.
207.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> Very nice to see these dev tools get an exit. e.g. I love `uv` and friends but did consider that perhaps dev tools are just a bad business I can't even begin to comprehend what kind of world view you need to have, to think that be
208.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> The risk tends to show up more with non-experts This hits a key point that isn't emphasised enough. A few interactions with technology and people have shaped my view: I fiddled with Apple's Image Playground thing sometime las
209.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> you don't have personal experience with this type of development, so you might not see what pain points it solves. That all depends what you mean by "this type of development". Do you mean development targeting a browser
210.
▲
by
stephenr
9mo ago
> they fail convincingly To someone that has paid zero attention and/or deliberately ignores any coverage about the numerous (and often hilarious) ways that spicy autocomplete just completely shits the bed? Sure, maybe.
More ›