Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
stephenr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
If it's your ssh server and it's single user you don't need to use the "git@" part at all. Just store the repo and access it with your account. The whole git@ thing is because most "forge" software is buil
62.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
So don't give them your phone number. Arguing against 2FA is like arguing that they shouldn't bash your password because it means you can't see your password to help remember it.
63.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
I can't reply to your reply so in case you see this: Yes anything booked ahead I generally put into a calendar entry. iOS/macOS makes this pretty simple (it detects most booking emails and offers to create an entry for me; in thos
64.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
So, "spicy autocomplete is down, I can't do any work" is the new even more ridiculous "GitHub is down I can't do any work"? I'd laugh if this wasn't a depressing thought for this industry. Then again,
65.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
It's an announcement that they're providing first party integrated first party services for something that until now has largely relied on third party solutions. Not knowing about the exiting solutions to provision/manage Mac
66.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
> leads me to a point where I can see that the issue is a simple fix with a couple lines of code. If you can see the problem, know how to fix it, and still ask spicy autocomplete to do it for you, that isn't "using a tool"
67.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
It's called a calendar entry. Not every life experience is some giant challenge waiting for a tech bro to create a dedicated fucking app.
68.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
With the way modern development often goes this essentially means using spicy autocomplete for code is a just a fast track to the cargo culted solutions of whatever day the model was trained.
69.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
Given that they literally changed the language to support the class keyword, I think we can safely assume it isn't just the beginners who never bothered to learn how prototypical inheritance works.
70.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
> In reality someone made a mistake. It's never just one mistake. It's usually a chain of mistakes and bad decisions that make the final mistake possible. I'd estimate that there were likely 77,168,458 mistakes/bad de
71.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
Wait till I tell those people we keep all our dependencies (js and backend) in our own git repo. Updating dependencies is a task a person does, followed by committing the changes to the repo. I am aware a lot of these ideas are heretical
72.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
Fair point. Let's compromise and say that whoever is responsible for involving (javascript|electron fields) in the display of a website, should each understand their respective field. I don't expect a physicist or even an electric
73.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
The problem I think is that the js community somehow thinks that being on npm is some bastion of good quality. Just as the cloud is simply someone else's computer, a package is just someone else's reinvented wheel. The problem is
74.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
I'm completely apathetic about spicy autocomplete for coding tasks and even I wonder which terrible code would be worse. The guy who wrote is even/odd was for ages using a specifically obscure method that made it slower than %2===
75.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
That's a good point, it's only been around for 30 years, and used on 95% of websites. It's not really popular enough for a developer to take an hour or two to read how it works.
76.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
As usual, he's copying someone else who's been doing this for years: https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-number - and then look and see shit like is odd, is even (yes two separate packages because who can possib
77.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
The primary cause of JS bloat is assuming you need JS or that customers want whatever you're using it to provide. For $client we've taken a very minimal approach to JavaScript, particularly on customer facing pages. An upcoming fe
78.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
It's been known for a while - at least 2024 - that its react.
79.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
How you are "valuable" as the product is absolutely a relevant distinction to make. When the valuable part is data collection, you don't get a choice in how your user data is sold. When the valuable part is influencing opinio
80.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
If at this point you (where you may be a person or a company) still think relying on spicy autocomplete is a smart decision, I can't fucking help you, and you deserve whatever bad things happen to you. This is akin to saying "we a
81.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
Im not talking about an api. Im talking about an end user feature. Or are you telling me that chrome has a fucking video call client built in as well?
82.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
Proxies are protocol specific. A vpn is a network layer tunnel. Does your browser also include its own built in ip stack? Maybe it should have its own window system. DNS arguably would also be best left to the OS, yes.
83.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
There's an oft repeated claim about "Modern Browsers are some of the most complex projects" Yeah no shit, when you have browser vendors shipping features that have no place in browser, it's hardly surprising. Why does a
84.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
that isn't the gotcha you think it is. Y combinator absolutely profits from encouraging group think and positive attitudes about things they're involved in. How else would you get a large part of the tech world to somehow believe
85.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
... write the code yourself? Seems like a pretty easy solution so many people overlook when coming up with increasingly asinine rube Goldberg like solutions to problems that are inherent to relying on spicy autocomplete. This whole obsessio
86.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
This would be handy, but to be honest there's zero chance I'd use this if I can't self host the relay, and if you aren't hosting the relay $30 a month is steep for something that has no real feature growth
87.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
> JetBrains isn't excluded for technical reasons, but geopolitical ones. This makes perfect sense. Who could possibly trust a company run from... the Netherlands. I get that you don't make the rules you're working under, b
88.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
... you can't use JetBrains? What logic created a scenario where you can't use arguably the best range of cross platform IDEs, but you can somehow use spicy autocomplete to imitate some of their functionality, poorly?
89.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
IntelliJ platform (JetBrains IDEs) has this functionality out of the box without "AI" using regular code intelligence. If all your parameters are strings it may not work well I guess but if you're using types it works quite w
90.
▲
by
stephenr
7mo ago
Do you mean suggesting arguments to provide based on name/type context?
More ›