stemuk

14 ms·

91.
by stemuk 10y ago
It seems like you have to wait some seconds for the server to process the comment, if you refresh it should let you comment again. Anyway, looking forward to the data release, through a blog post I suppose?
92.
by stemuk 10y ago
Is there some data available on which factor the perfomance benefitted from this change (like some benchmark results)?
93.
by stemuk 10y ago
Would this mean you are getting rid of engine.io as the base, or is this just meant to be a general addition?
94.
by stemuk 10y ago
This might help you out for now (if you are using Firefox): https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/accessibility-features-...
95.
by stemuk 10y ago
:D I am actually trying to do something similar with the js client. I recently tried to convert it to Dart using jsparser, since i am working with http://flutter.io , a hybrid app development project from Google. It worked out ju
96.
by stemuk 10y ago
Nice, really appreciate the progress here! However, is there any reason the artifacts aren't on github? It may be more convenient when it comes to issues/changelogs etc.
97.
by stemuk 10y ago
Are there any plans for an iOS/Swift client? So far it seems only js and Java clients are available...
98.
by stemuk 10y ago
Although I generally disagree with the parent comment, I have to say that AWS actually IS overpriced. Just look at Cloud plattforms like OVH.com or even digitalocean.com, they charge almost nothing for the traffic, whereas it comes at a who
99.
by stemuk 10y ago
I think the most obvious comparison is Firebase, but as a self-hosted solution deepstream is much cheaper (5-10x, dependant on the usecase). The creators of deepstream.io have actually written a blog post that covers this exact topic: http
100.
by stemuk 10y ago
Is it possible to cluster deepstream in multiple AWS regions? It may be beneficial when it comes to latency...
101.
by stemuk 10y ago
What always strikes me is the amount of free traffic Hetzner includes in their plans, always 20TB and upwards. AWS charges a whooping 90$ per TB, it keeps me wondering why their traffic is SO much more expensive than Hetzner's...
102.
by stemuk 10y ago
X gon give it to ya!
103.
by stemuk 10y ago
Same here. However ello stayed competetive in the niche of a social network for artist and creators, which is probably fine for the people behind it.
104.
by stemuk 10y ago
True, maybe https://github.com/firebase could help with some reverse engineering. However, I discovered the Firebase document and the deepstream.io record structure to be fairly similar, so with the help of https:/&#x
105.
by stemuk 10y ago
If you ate not willing/able to pay for managed cloud services like Firebase, there are some really cool self-hosted alternatives out there (like deepstream.io and horizon.io). Open-sourcing software should always be a can, not a must.
106.
by stemuk 10y ago
I know everybody would love to see this, but for me it's a bit much to ask from Google to open-source Firebase since they invested quite a lot of time and money into it to get to the current version. Apart from that, I can definetly re
107.
by stemuk 10y ago
Probably not, scince Signal doesn't really support secure web communication (without phone routing).
108.
by stemuk 10y ago
I wonder how they encrypted their chat on the web client. Scince the Signal protocol is kind of the gold standard right now, probably their solution might in the end be the better one.
109.
by stemuk 10y ago
I may be naive, but Firebase may be the perfect fit for this kind of task scince it scales pretty good. Niantec would probably get massive discounts as well as an Ex-google company...
110.
by stemuk 10y ago
Best Comment: "If you've got UI problems, I feel bad for you son. I've got 99 problems, but design ain't one."
111.
by stemuk 10y ago
How was your overall experience for the swich to self-hosted ads in terms of time and money you had to invest given that the main sellingpoint for Adsense is its ease of use?
112.
by stemuk 10y ago
Sure, no problem! Was just curious, it seemed too good to be true :D
113.
by stemuk 10y ago
Could you share a link to the Firebase SMS verification you stated in your comment? Was actually looking for something like this... :D
114.
by stemuk 10y ago
Looks really promising to me, relatively similar to www.deepstream.io . However, will there be additional clients /are they already in development by the community? So far I only found support for vue.js and React. Polymer elements wou
115.
by stemuk 10y ago
I am not that into this topic, but could you compare DL to Soundclouds Roshi[0], and if not, whats different? Thanks! [0] https://github.com/soundcloud/roshi
116.
by stemuk 10y ago
True, but if you are looking for offline adaptions of your webapp there is a really cool technology called service worker that works as an offline cache for your whole app.
117.
by stemuk 10y ago
Well, only partly true. Because all paper/iron elements are adapting seamlessly on mobile, there is no real need for a mobile framework.
118.
by stemuk 11y ago
1. I found it interesting that some 'projects' only officially support Atom, e.g. www.polymer-project.org 2. Really fast release scedule. While this may trade of some stability here and there, it cetainly adds new features quicker
119.
Web Devs Aren’t Learning the Basics. Does That Matter?(futurehosting.com)
1 points by stemuk 11y ago|1 comments
120.
Ask HN: Do you use any realtime PaaS/framework and in case you so which one?
2 points by stemuk 11y ago|1 comments

More ›