Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
steego
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
511.
▲
by
steego
11y ago
Here's what I took away:: It's pain in the ass to validate and sanitize your input.
512.
▲
by
steego
11y ago
Absolutely! However, we must be careful not to define it in a too predictable way lest we violate the Principle of Most Surprise.
513.
▲
by
steego
11y ago
> This is well-known PHP-trick. Use === to right result. Everybody knows PHP is a trickly-typed language. Read the docs people or PHP will take advantage of your gullible ass.
514.
▲
by
steego
11y ago
As someone who's used OData for this sort of strong typed, ad-hoc interaction with the server, I'm really happy to see Facebook push this idea. Compared to OData, I really like how GraphGL's approach of making a query look l
515.
▲
by
steego
11y ago
You're missing the point. It is in many ways better than Visual Studio because it's lightweight editor with a lot of the good stuff like a debugger, intellisense, refactoring, code navigation, etc. This caters to people who want
516.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
No. I want to retract my accusation. I just think it's a bad opinion post clouded by the poster's desire for a world where online education will replace offline institutions without clarifying how or providing current examples.
517.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
Sorry about that. Click-bait PR stunt was too strong. (I'd edit my post if I could). I really do think it's an honest opinion, but it's a vague opinion of somebody who's hopeful of the success of their company. Withou
518.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
Why are we giving credit to this click-bait PR stunt for Platzi? Let me quickly sum this up. We have a guy who works for a tiny online training company that provides a whopping 7 classes talking about how online vocational training is goin
519.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
> the submitter seemed to think that everybody knew him I get it. Sometimes, I forget not everybody knows my heroes. Personally speaking, I think Paul Hudak is worthy of broader recognition given his contributions to the functional pro
520.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
He also collaborated with Conal Elliott to bring us functional reactive programming as we know it today. (Though, I'm sure Conal would be more than helpful to point out how most implementations still have it wrong.)
521.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
First off, nothing personal against you here. Onto the post: Read his comment again. This article is painting a picture of silicon valley kids coming up with exciting new nootropic drugs that will help us perform better mentally. OP is say
522.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
Yes. You outed me. That's exactly the point I'm making. I'm claiming Adderall has no noticeable effects. I'm also claiming caffeine does help people stay awake and that pot doesn't give people the munchies. While w
523.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
I remember reading in one of Dan Ariely's book that spending more on placebos makes them more effective. (He typically tested people by giving them word scrambles or similar tasks). Remember kids, if you want a really good placebo exp
524.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
Thank you guys for your informative endorsements! I wasn't sure if I was going to spend $80 on something that looks like its marketed to imbeciles, but now that you and the other two reputable HN news users endorsed it, I'm going
525.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
I bet he didn't even read the marketing literature or the industry funded studies.
526.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
Please consider donating to the Gary Dahl Shelter for Abused and Abandoned Pet Rocks. You can help rocks like these guys: https://img1.etsystatic.com/000/0/6083373/il_fullxfull.33098... http://i.yt
527.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
It's the same world where the government will fine you a hundred million dollars for price fixing, but then prop you up with billions of dollars in subsidies. Lysine Price Fixing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysine
528.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
I'm always surprised when programmers confuse unidirectional implication with bidirectional implication. I'm only making a comment that alternatives to C++ are really good at attracting people who never developed the discipline r
529.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
I didn't. I was describing what makes it attractive to newer developers with limited C++ experience. I'm sure it's also attractive to some experienced C++ developers who have grown tired of C++'s shit. I personally fin
530.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
I think you make an excellent point that this is a poor demonstration if one is trying to convince a decent C++ programmer to try Rust. Many of these issues are simply not a problem for moderately disciplined C++ programmers. If anything,
531.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
I get it. The sequence of events seems very analogous to a Rube Goldberg machine, and one would conclude if the sequence of events didn't go as planned the parasite would have been doomed. My theory is the parasite community for that
532.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
> which is certainly an amazing feat of lobbying. It's like I heard a collective "bitch please" come from the banks, food wholesalers, defense contractors, insurance companies, immigration lawyers, patent attorneys, entert
533.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
It's more than ironic. I'm actually concerned about this guy. It appears he might be in the cross-hairs of some individuals who are willing to leverage whatever they have at their disposal to shut him up and maybe make an exampl
534.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
I honestly can't comment on the specifications, but seeing how you're familiar with them, can you elaborate? What makes them ludicrous? How would you structure the specifications to be more reasonable? How would you layout the
535.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
If you don't feel like reading the whole thing, here's the gist: Another government contractor (Lockhead Martin) fucks up now it's the FAA's fault for having standards. My one experience working on a government contract
536.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
It sounds like you're putting the bait out so somebody will disagree with you and then you'll explain the alternative to using identity as a form of authorization. Can you save us a long and stupid discussion and simply explain yo
537.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
Comments telling us blogs telling us what's NOT the answer are NOT the answer are NOT the answer. (Sentence verified: http://nlp.stanford.edu:8080/parser/index.jsp )
538.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
> It's not even small data. We get it. Your data's pretty big.
539.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
No one is stopping the weird kid from reappropriating words and nobody is being bullied. People are simply objecting to a use of the word. This is no different than people objecting to using the word literally to emphasize a figurative expr
540.
▲
by
steego
12y ago
...and give up the opportunity to remind programmers their OOP is the inferior OOP? :)
More ›