stagas

12 ms·

271.
by stagas 3y ago
That's what I'm pointing out though? That it is runtime type validation and not type safety. They are two different things, the only common is the word "type". Please read the comment again.
272.
by stagas 3y ago
For sure! Do you pay money $$$? :)
273.
by stagas 3y ago
I have to stretch my imagination a lot to see how "type-safe" can mean "it throws at runtime".
274.
by stagas 3y ago
For this software to be appealing it would need to really be type-safe, meaning you'd need to use TypeScript. Type-safe means I can change an interface in project B and project A that depends on B now shows me errors in the editor exac
275.
by stagas 3y ago
It's not pedantry, you're using the term wrong. I understand why it can be confusing if you are just using JavaScript and you haven't had the experience of type-safe codebases. Type-safe does not refer to runtime anything, it
276.
by stagas 3y ago
Type Safety != Runtime Type Validation. Something being Type Safe means that I, the programmer, am Safe from making type mistakes while developing and maintaining the software. For that to be possible, you need a type system that is embedde
277.
by stagas 3y ago
It's failing to start, tons of errors in the console. The language looks good, and I'd like to give it a try but I can't find any repo of the compiler/LSP extension so I can try it locally, it seems only this hosted IDE
278.
by stagas 3y ago
I had seen this happening. I was running webgl shaders in chrome in a pipeline where i was passing the result of the previous screen to be processed by the next, then sometimes I would get portions of other app windows inside the result
279.
by stagas 3y ago
Funny I just saw venus earlier and i've never seen it actually have a visible diameter rather than just being a bright dot. It does look like a small sphere right now.
280.
by stagas 3y ago
This looks really well done! Congrats.
281.
by stagas 3y ago
Ok, I had never seen it simplified like that though, and definitely wasn't aware that from a random coin you can be net positive if you cooperate, that's a surprise to my knowledge and I find that idea very valuable. Edit: also I
282.
by stagas 3y ago
Seems reasonable to me, go with it. I mean, it also makes sense even at a societal level, would you rather people around you when you walk in the street be content/satisfied or looking out for a victim to steal from? I'd rather al
283.
by stagas 3y ago
The article seems pretty reasonable to me, the theory seems to work. Can you clarify which part of it you find problematic because I don't see it in the article? Edit: here is also the source code for the cooperative coin, if it helps
284.
by stagas 3y ago
AI has been synonymous with ML for years now.
285.
by stagas 3y ago
The lack of features, is a feature.
286.
by stagas 3y ago
Looks great, congrats! For those wondering, it's a Web Components framework in the style of Next.js. Web Components are standard HTML elements, hence HTML-first (at least that's how I interpret it).
287.
by stagas 3y ago
This reminds me of the Chaos programming model[0], the idea is you just work on whatever is (seemingly) the most important issue you encounter, without any higher level planning. Usually at the end of some work or integration there are tons
288.
by stagas 3y ago
It's not the same because with Wasm you only need to distribute a single binary to support all current and future platforms.
289.
Ask HN: How can we make AI available to everyone?
3 points by stagas 3y ago|5 comments
290.
by stagas 3y ago
I guess computers will never be able to figure that one out.
291.
by stagas 4y ago
The speed of the response is impressive and the accuracy is very good as well. Great work!
292.
by stagas 4y ago
And also varying the latency from one system to another can alter the timing behavior of dsp code which will definitely change the sound.
293.
by stagas 4y ago
So, literally, a higher state of consciousness.
294.
by stagas 4y ago
When you look at red, you see red. You don't see "frequency" or "light" or any other thing we invented to describe red. When you say red I know immediately what you mean because I am also experiencing the color re
295.
by stagas 4y ago
I'm not trolling. There is no concept of frequency in the color red. Frequency is an abstraction/reduction you make in your mind in order to explain it. The real phenomenon is "red". Frequency is just a concept that work
296.
by stagas 4y ago
Subjectivity is all you have, there's no extreme version of it. And ethics is also something we define. In any case, you have to make a jump and make a metaphysical claim that you can't prove. There are two possible claims: 1) The
297.
by stagas 4y ago
You can't perceive the solar system, but whatever it is you are experiencing, it exists now and you can only know about it through your senses. It doesn't necessarily follow that it existed prior to you experiencing it, it wouldn&
298.
by stagas 4y ago
It's the other way around. Frequency is an abstraction. Sound/color is the reality.
299.
by stagas 4y ago
It is actionable because once you come to terms with the fact that most of your knowledge is based on (flawed) assumptions, you are a) less inclined to try to impose your views onto others (because no single view has greater weight than ano
300.
by stagas 4y ago
I don't remember perception starting and so far i have no indication that it ends, so it's all assumptions here because "perception end" is something i cannot know, empirically.

More ›