Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
st3v3r
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
123 ms
·
961.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
It's an SMS, not a formal email to a client.
962.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Less code does mean less possibility of bugs.
963.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Now that's yet another marketplace they have to deal with. And when he was selling on Amazon, his product was in the Amazon warehouse. It wasn't until later that he began shipping things himself.
964.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
So now you're moving the goalposts.
965.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
So don't go to those sites/platforms. And this isn't a case of "things the administration doesn't like", this is a case of breaking the clear rules and harassing other users.
966.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Saudi Arabia and China.
967.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
"Conservatives are ok with freedom of speech" No, they're not. They're the ones saying that people shouldn't be allowed to protest many things like Chik-Fil-A's support of gay marriage bans, protesting police d
968.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Saying he did nothing wrong is ignoring the entirety of the situation. At the very least, you have to agree that falsifying tweets from another user was against the ToS, and thus earned him his ban.
969.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Agreed, but businesses that would be doing that aren't thinking about turnover anyway.
970.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Yes. They work hard during that time, instead of faffing about. Working hard doesn't have to mean you spend all your time at work. In fact, if you're not the owner of the company, that's a terrible thing to do.
971.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Because then we don't get to enjoy the benefits of that productivity. We are exponentially more productive than we were back 50 years ago. Yet, we still have to work 40+ hours a week. We could be working 20-30 hours a week, and still b
972.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
No to overtime being paid in time off. Many times, they'll gladly let you do that, only to not let you ever use it, assuming they actually remember that they promised it to you.
973.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Which most of that is. The vast majority of developers are on salary, which means that 4 AM emergency fix and crunch time are effectively free.
974.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
"The post doesn't say "don't micromanage"" That is exactly what it says. "it says that if you provide your 2 cents when shown something and ASKED SPECIFICALLY "What do you think?" (!) that if you
975.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
But once again, this isn't about constructive feedback. This is about nitpicky, subjective things. The article does not say to hold back constructive feedback. It says to stop nitpicking your employees to death.
976.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
The article didn't miss that at all. The article wasn't about meaningful feedback. It was about petty, subjective feedback that doesn't really serve to make anything better, but to make the manager feel as if they did somethi
977.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
But this article isn't about giving constructive criticism and advice. It's about those 2c opinions which are not constructive, but rather just subjective.
978.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
But that skill only exists because managers do stuff like this. If they didn't, then that skill wouldn't be needed.
979.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Because there's absolutely no reason for them to be "bad". There is no reason whatsoever that we have to allow sweatshops to exist.
980.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
That says that jobs are good. It says nothing about the sweatshops.
981.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Only if those poor can actually afford those cheaper clothes.
982.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
"accept unemployment as a result of technical progress" Ok. Are you going to be the one that has to give up their job forever?
983.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Except that's explicitly not allowed.
984.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
I'm not convinced that bucket 1 is bad for the ecosystem.
985.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Except while I'm getting that education, I still have bills to pay. I still have a mortgage, and I still have a family to feed.
986.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Training for those jobs takes time and resources. Not everyone who has lost their existing job will be able to invest those things at possibly getting another one. Also, if you send a bunch of people into those fields, the cost of labor wil
987.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
For #2, if by "business friendly", you mean anti-employee. Despite all this hoopla about California being "business unfriendly", it still leads in startups and innovation. Mainly because a lot of the talent wants to be i
988.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
How much does doing that pay? How much does being a finance guy on Wall Street pay (or at least have the allure of paying)? How much does being part of a trendy startup in SV pay (or at least have the allure of paying)? Doing the job you wa
989.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
So basically your solution is to have more money.
990.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
You have to admit there's a huge difference between one or two people on a plot of land doing something, vs getting a plot of land and trying to bring 20,000 people onto it.
More ›