Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
st3v3r
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
61.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
"(1) can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Women should be just as passionate about the work." Being aggressive is not being passionate. Don't confuse the two. If you can't get your point across without bein
62.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
"Staying focused on making money, saving money, saving time, and making customers happier." To be perfectly honest, that sounds like a recipe for a dull ass, penny pinching, unenjoyable work environment. The kind where you're
63.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
You install it
64.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
You can't do that if the ones that refuse to upgrade are some of the bigger providers on the network.
65.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
"On Android they changed "Email" client to "Gmail" client." No, they didn't. Those are two separate apps. The Email one is part of AOSP. The Gmail one is part of Google Apps. Although many OEMs roll their
66.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
You realize that if they did offer that support, every spammer in the world would be using it to make sure their spam gets through.
67.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Again, no concrete actions coming from it. You are looking for a conspiracy where none exists. You are just like the PizzaGate people. Listen, I wanted Bernie too. I cast my primary ballot for him as well. But clearly more registered member
68.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
No, there was no concrete evidence. There were a few emails from DNC staffers that stated they would prefer Clinton. That is it. There was no actual actions taken. And OMG, someone told Clinton that there would be a question about Flint
69.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
The only way you could make that argument is if you feel that ISPs should be able to do this in the first place. I, for one, feel they absolutely should not be able to do this under any circumstances. As such, I do not see it as overreach,
70.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
No, they didn't. More members of your party voted for a different candidate. There was no concrete evidence that any action was actually taken to fix anything.
71.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
No. This reductionism is intellectually lazy, and does nothing except let you smugly think you're superior to everyone else.
72.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
NSA spying is far, far, far different than having all your info available to the highest bidder.
73.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
I do not agree at all that campaign finance reform would be detrimental to free speech. If anything, it'd be a boom for free speech, because you wouldn't have a few ultra-rich people dominating the conversation. Limit everyone to
74.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Because workers have seen their rights and their station in life vastly eroded over the past 30-40 years.
75.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Yeah, that's easy for you to say. Are you going to pay to put my kids through college so I can make you happy by signing up for your experiment? I didn't think so
76.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Are you gonna pay their rent while others "break the loop"?
77.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
It's kinda hard to do something that matters if you're struggling to pay rent or feed your family.
78.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
That was never the idea. Desegregation came about because the white schools often had better funding, thus better teachers, better facilities, and an overall better experience. Seriously, it was never about putting people in "the gener
79.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
How would they get there if they have no money?
80.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
I think the difficulty in automating a lot of these jobs is preventing that.
81.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
That's not entirely true.
82.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
No, it's not. For one, other people having things worse off does not mean that certain people should not be trying to better themselves. For two, if that were true, then the heavy equipment operators should be asking for raises, as the
83.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
I mean, in a sane world, there simply wouldn't be a need for this discussion, because there wouldn't be exemptions for overtime pay.
84.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
I fully believe that, much like persons registering as sex offenders are not allowed to go certain places, persons found to be involved in wage theft should be banned from running a business or being in any kind of managerial position whats
85.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
When you're used to them laying right next to you, with no walls between, then adding walls is going to be more isolating.
86.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
Anyone who claims the minimum wage level is absurd has clearly never tried to live on it.
87.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
No, YT's automatic captioning is absolute trash. It most definitely is worse than nothing.
88.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
UC Berkley is a Tax funded university, so your argument is bunk. And I disagree anyways; if the business wants to do something, they are responsible for following the law. That includes making reasonable accommodations for persons with disa
89.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
UC Berkley is tax funded. They're a public university.
90.
▲
by
st3v3r
10y ago
They weren't made illegal. The lectures were inaccessible to deaf people. Given that they were created with public funds, that's not acceptable. Berkley decided to throw them away rather than remedy this, in a rather short sighted
More ›