st3v3r

56 ms·

571.
by st3v3r 10y ago
They're gonna have to have a solution for harassment out of the gate, otherwise they'll suffer the same fate.
572.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Even if Twitter itself is not saved, whatever springs up in it's place is likely going to have similar problems with harassment.
573.
by st3v3r 10y ago
It's definitely a cool tool if most of your development uses the command line. As a mobile developer, however, most of my development is spent in IDEs. Alas, that means my use of tmux is limited.
574.
by st3v3r 10y ago
And committed fraud rather than admit they were in over their heads.
575.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Wouldn't it be 4x $100 notes? Why would you take the two $100 notes if you knew they were being devalued?
576.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Depends on if you can find someone who's willing to take your new store of value. Part of the reason those people were able to get away with it was that those notes were regular legal tender, so I didn't have to worry about accept
577.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Well, if the company really is "open by default", they can open the source for Office, and the community can aid in the port.
578.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Cool. Where's the Windows and Office source? I've got some changes I'd like to contribute.
579.
by st3v3r 10y ago
That's the same for every company, including Google. But that has nothing to do with what we're discussing, which are the improvements to security.
580.
by st3v3r 10y ago
It is in that Soylent used an experimental ingredient which had not been shown to be appropriate for this use.
581.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Those have existed for quite some time. And, quite frankly, they're just packaging food. That's not novel. Every other food maker is responsible for making sure their product is safe. Why should Soylent be any different?
582.
by st3v3r 10y ago
No, the idea that the government is going to make it mandatory. That alone is looney enough to make the rest of your post unreasonable for discussion.
583.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Nothing in your post was close to reasonable.
584.
by st3v3r 10y ago
That shouldn't be paying customers.
585.
by st3v3r 10y ago
That is quite possibly the most short-sighted response to this topic. Few would read it, and no company would offer any kind of information that is actually conclusive. Expecting the free market to do anything except optimize for profit is
586.
by st3v3r 10y ago
"Soylent is trying to do something more ambitious than other packaged food manufacturers" No, they aren't. There is nothing special about what they're trying to do compared to any other packaged food manufacturer. That&#
587.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Move fast and make people vomit
588.
by st3v3r 10y ago
And then after the host finds out who it is, magically that date is "unavailable".
589.
by st3v3r 10y ago
A host is absolutely a business. Anyone thinking this is just "sharing" has no idea what they're talking about.
590.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Yes. Make a native app.
591.
by st3v3r 10y ago
No. 99% of users are not going to want a Linux style package manager. That's not a solution that will work in any way for normal people.
592.
by st3v3r 10y ago
The point is, there should be a plugin system, where the developer doesn't have to care what the mapping API is, so the user can slot in whatever they want.
593.
by st3v3r 10y ago
That doesn't make any sense at all. If they're doing work in the meeting, then they probably didn't need to be there. If they do need to be there, then they should be concentrating on the meeting. Otherwise the number of meet
594.
by st3v3r 10y ago
Or not going to the meeting at all, or leaving after you're done.
595.
by st3v3r 10y ago
So if they're working on their laptops, why were they in the meeting? They're not paying attention, they're not contributing to the discussion, and worse, if they do need to pay attention and contribute, they're going to
596.
by st3v3r 10y ago
With things like Doze, the only thing that can wake the device is a push message FROM GOOGLE. That doesn't sound open in the least. "The underlying theme connecting these libraries is that they're clients for Google's pr
597.
by st3v3r 10y ago
I don't see how anything but regulation would do it. The companies clearly don't give a shit, and they won't, as they can't really be held accountable.
598.
by st3v3r 10y ago
In order to get the android alternative on there, someone has to do the work to get it on there in the first place. If no one has done it for your device, then that job falls to you. Which is why most of these target Nexus devices, because
599.
by st3v3r 10y ago
I can say the same thing about you. All founders have this absurd sense of entitlement, that they alone deserve the bulk of reward, despite the fact that most of the work is done by other people.
600.
by st3v3r 10y ago
It absolutely is, considering that 20% of the work has to be done, and if the employee isn't doing it, then the founder has to be doing it, taking time away from revenue producing activities. This idea that only those who are deliverin

More ›