st-keller

8 ms·

61.
by st-keller 5y ago
Not everyone says the touchbar is useless. I absolutely love it! I will miss it. And the new Macbook may be a beast but it looks terribly old - like a yesterday-machine. For the first time Apple released a product i will buy because it wil
62.
by st-keller 5y ago
What if the total energy of the whole universe amounts to zero? If - what we call „everything“ - and that what we call „nothing“ is essentially the same? Structurally they clearly are: Both are „unbounded“ - „borderless“. What if a „void“ i
63.
by st-keller 5y ago
I have to sign-in with my Apple-ID regularly (once a month) - but only on MacOS-Devices.
64.
by st-keller 5y ago
I simply stopped trying to like it. Trying to „like“ exercising proofed to be more of a burdon than exercising itself. So now im doing it despite of hating it - and that feels a lot better: Now I‘m honest to myself and every time i finish a
65.
by st-keller 13y ago
Yes, maybe China - take about 20 minutes and listen to this talk: http://www.ted.com/talks/eric_x_li_a_tale_of_two_political_s... At least - a system without elections doesn't breed people, whose primary ability i
66.
by st-keller 16y ago
I was thirteen - my parents didn't know what a computer was good for - so i didn't got one. so i had to write my first programs onto sheets of paper (lot's of them). i had to do lots of typing when i finally got my c64 ;-)
67.
by st-keller 17y ago
We're designing a new "evaluation-system". It uses a new pure functional, time-unaware, inherently parallel core which works without using monads. The core can be considered as a read-eval-print loop without the "read" and the "print". If i
68.
Ask HN: What will you do on Hitchhikers-Day?
1 points by st-keller 17y ago|0 comments
69.
by st-keller 17y ago
Paul's new RFS "development 4 handhelds" seems to be quite simple: The only problem to be solved is: How to design a IDE that doesn't need a keyboard. I admit that this may be a bit diffcult as long programs are "written". Does anyone have
70.
by st-keller 17y ago
I agree - If you're focused on debugging. But there's much more to that. "Running backwards" is not "replay". Running backwards a clock-program will result in hands turning anti-clockwise. Not mentioned the possibilities you can do, if prog
71.
by st-keller 17y ago
Of course we need a new programming language - but i don't think we need GO. Here's my personal whishlist: * Concurrency as default (i don't want to express explicitly which parts of my porogram can run in parallel). * I want my programs to