ssss11

62 ms·

841.
by ssss11 6y ago
Wow. There’s alot of ego in that quote.
842.
by ssss11 6y ago
Surely there’s more than 2 types. Another off the top of my head - competitors.
843.
by ssss11 6y ago
Do whats best for the user. Does the user want that? No.
844.
by ssss11 6y ago
You are the product. We need to change that business model.
845.
by ssss11 6y ago
It can change rapidly. I’d suggest follow which interests you most.
846.
by ssss11 6y ago
There is a need for ethics in the technology industry. Without it, capitalism causes ordinary people to do unethical things for profit.
847.
by ssss11 6y ago
{ what: doyou, mean: jsonis, not: forhumans }
848.
by ssss11 6y ago
I dont like advertising, if I am interested in something, thats upon me to research it. I dont mind marketing per se, if Ive sought you out, so long as the information is truth and not fluffy lies. Dont track me or try to profile me without
849.
by ssss11 6y ago
Like all opportunities to make money it will become a scenario of ‘good drivers’ get to keep the same cost (no discount) and ‘bad drivers’ (the other 90%) get to pay more.
850.
by ssss11 6y ago
From point 1 it sounds like they already use Postman for testing and so using it for documentation makes it easier - perhaps its somewhat automated.
851.
by ssss11 6y ago
Yeah, ok fair call - there must be some who want this. “None” was too bold.
852.
by ssss11 6y ago
Yeah thats right, I think in Australia your vote basically means nothing.
853.
by ssss11 6y ago
I’d genuinely like to know how everday citizens get their government to do the rght thing. It seems everywhere around the world they just do what benefits themselves. people protest, and get hit with rubber bullets, but nothing seems to ch
854.
by ssss11 6y ago
How do you draw the conclusion that the Australian people want this behaviour? As far as I can tell none us want this but once elected the politicians fail to action what the people want. Over and over again...
855.
by ssss11 6y ago
The top level replies here are interesting, I think, for the HN crowd. There’s some great examples of social good - helping homelessness, poor countries, the starving, the environment etc. I don’t see anything though related to digital huma
856.
by ssss11 6y ago
I do think the underlying problems existed before him. For instance, the west allowed all manufacturing eggs to be put in China's basket for over 30 years without diversifying sourcing. Another example is that China insists you venture
857.
by ssss11 6y ago
That was meant to be a reply to 463yeuddjje!
858.
by ssss11 6y ago
I don’t know what a zoomer is or whether I’m woke, but there’s real cause for concern here because bad actors use new tools to do new bad things. Our human rights laws do not keep up with technology and governments dont give a shit.
859.
by ssss11 6y ago
I think the western world hoped China would open up over the past 20 years.. unfortunately that strategy has become a spectacular failure
860.
by ssss11 6y ago
Not programming but I work in a Project Management Office in a global corporation. This company sends all PM’s and BA’s on a job-relevant training course each year. This is the only company that I’ve received real training from in a ~15 yea
861.
by ssss11 6y ago
There are alot of ongoing trials and indeed unprecented global effort towards a vaccine but we can’t forget the usual time to market, and the fact that no vaccine has ever been created for a coronavirus. 6 months is very optimistic.
862.
by ssss11 6y ago
Tech companies need to stop thinking they should moderate content. This isnt their job and its a can of worms they’re ill equipped to manage.
863.
by ssss11 6y ago
Pidgin is exactly what we need.. and each messenger needs to be a pluggable module. Then we dont need to hound friends and family to switch messenger apps they just use pidgin.
864.
by ssss11 6y ago
I completely agree. The approach of hiring young and training them is particularly overlooked these days but is the best approach as you end up with a blend of experience over time.
865.
by ssss11 6y ago
It ‘seems’ that way for sure, but i have a feeling its because these people who were always this way now have a platform to speak on, or that validates their existing thinking and solidifies it. Its a good point though - how do we test a th
866.
by ssss11 6y ago
I like that saying. And i agree companies should only be allowed to gather the minimal data necessary in a given situation.
867.
by ssss11 6y ago
I think it depends on the scenario selected. I’ve found pre-mortems annoying, and given any number of risks that could materialise how do you choose the right one for the pre-mortem for maximum value discussion? Plus I generally dislike the
868.
by ssss11 6y ago
This resonates alot. I’d add another incentive for the “sponsor” is that they can pay you less as well, as its an “opportunity”. As a sibling commentor said though, you gotta be good enough, so dont be too hard on yourself for giving it a c
869.
by ssss11 6y ago
They need to _appear_ to have their customers’ (oops I meant users’) interests in mind.
870.
by ssss11 6y ago
Yeah but doesn’t it feel like a race to the bottom? I mean, it feels like our politicians think country X is doing it so we (western democracy) better too, or risk losing global position in military/economy/etc

More ›