sridca

31 ms·

271.
by sridca 8y ago
Do you have anything worthwhile to say, instead of sarcasm and cynicism, in response to people actually healing themselves by eating exclusively meat? Or are you just here to denigrate your fellow human beings?
272.
by sridca 8y ago
And so are their criticisers. Why don't we all become nihilists and stop curing our medical conditions via dietary intervention?
273.
by sridca 8y ago
For some perspective, contrast this to the current fashionable trend of recommending plant-based diets where people unwittingly use nutrition epidemiology studies to validate their beliefs: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?
274.
by sridca 8y ago
Nevermind PhD, all MD education on nutrition is based on weak science--almost no clinical trials to support current recommendations: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19177014
275.
by sridca 8y ago
Also meatheals.com is chock-full of anecdotes of people healing themselves using the carnivore diet.
276.
by sridca 8y ago
Ha, post on HN that you are on a carnivore diet and people will pounce on you to tell you that you are not eating """healthy""".
277.
by sridca 8y ago
How about 20 years? http://meatheals.com/2018/02/04/charlene-andersen/
278.
They Thrive on All-Meat Diet (1929)(archive.macleans.ca)
70 points by sridca 8y ago|134 comments
279.
by sridca 8y ago
Tencent investment and the discussion on moderator censorship: https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/apu3oz/with_the... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19151922
280.
Sloppy science bears substantial blame for Americans' bad eating habits(latimes.com)
2 points by sridca 8y ago|0 comments
281.
by sridca 8y ago
What is it about this article (as in which particular text contained in it) that makes it belong to a set?
282.
by sridca 8y ago
Have you actually read the article? Do you have any worthwhile to say in direct response to the article?
283.
Why Do South Asians Have Such High Rates of Heart Disease?(nytimes.com)
4 points by sridca 8y ago|0 comments
284.
by sridca 8y ago
American culture influence is certainly growing over places like India and China, but the UK? Have you got any articles on that? I don't live in the UK, so curious to know.
285.
by sridca 8y ago
Other cultures tend to be "americanized" more than the other way around. Just do a Google search for `americanized india` or `americanized china`.
286.
by sridca 8y ago
> It's happened already. Where?
287.
by sridca 8y ago
Reddit is already one of the most heavily censored websites on the internet[1], so I like these rules. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19151922
288.
Avoiding Alzheimer’s Disease Could Be Easier Than You Think(psychologytoday.com)
26 points by sridca 8y ago|10 comments
289.
by sridca 8y ago
Reminds me of the color of band-aids (it never occurred to me for a long while, as a "person of colour", that band-aids are actually flesh-colored). https://www.patheos.com/blogs/rachelmariestone/2012&#x2
290.
Reddit is already one of the most heavily censored websites on the internet(reddit.com)
10 points by sridca 8y ago|2 comments
291.
Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results(tandfonline.com)
1 points by sridca 8y ago|0 comments
292.
There's No Such Thing as Real Vegetarians(munchies.vice.com)
3 points by sridca 8y ago|2 comments
293.
by sridca 8y ago
Yet that is what you are implying. You inject your (presumably agenda-based) disbelief onto their factual reports and then buttress that disbelief by channeling attention into irrelevant matters (thereby suppressing discussion of the therap
294.
A taste for fat may have made us human, says study(news.yale.edu)
60 points by sridca 8y ago|66 comments
295.
by sridca 8y ago
It is irrelevant, as it does not automagically make a factual report suddenly false. This is such basic comprehension; I have no idea why some people don't get it.
296.
by sridca 8y ago
Indeed: https://twitter.com/FructoseNo/status/1087091163545231360
297.
by sridca 8y ago
A lot of things are controversial here. HN is not exactly an unbiased group. They say be nice in guidelines, and yet won't do anything about people outright accusing others in comments.
298.
by sridca 8y ago
> Where are the [factual reports], then? Here http://meatheals.com/ and of course those of Petersons > There isn't even evidence that the Petersons follow their own diet advice. There are only claims and consulta
299.
by sridca 8y ago
Are malicious comments like this -- calling one's fellow human beings reporting what worked to cure their health "mentally ill" or "batshit crazy" -- actually allowed on HN?
300.
by sridca 8y ago
HN cares more about dogmatic beliefs than factual reports. No wonder you are being downvoted.

More ›