square_usual

5 ms·

31.
by square_usual 3mo ago
Every time I use opus these days I go shut up... you are not fable.. Hard to imagine how just three days with it changed how I saw LLM use.
32.
by square_usual 3mo ago
You can use them in the team plan, but not the enteprise plan.
33.
by square_usual 3mo ago
No? I live very close to Loudoun county, there's DCs across the road from homes.
34.
by square_usual 3mo ago
I'll never forget it. It's always on the back of my phone, so even if I'm in a hurry and run out I can still read a book on the metro.
35.
by square_usual 3mo ago
I've read an entire book on the X3 attached to the back of my phone and it hasn't been an issue. Reading horizontally I get close enough to the 80 chars per line ideal that it doesn't bother me at all.
36.
by square_usual 3mo ago
Specifically climate data, which can be used to argue for climate change action.
37.
by square_usual 3mo ago
You can make one yourself in ~100 lines of code.
38.
by square_usual 4mo ago
To be fair, those are on Frontier, so it's roughly equivalent to Ryanair.
39.
by square_usual 4mo ago
Vibe coding has made them a lot more common. Before, you'd need to put a lot more effort into making a website that worked like this, and it wasn't worth it for a random post. Now this person's entire website is posts like th
40.
by square_usual 4mo ago
[flagged]
41.
by square_usual 4mo ago
They aren't releasing it in China either.
42.
by square_usual 4mo ago
Opus 4.8 has made huge jumps in being less sycophantic. I see it pushing back on ideas a lot, and that's very helpful when you're evaluating options.
43.
by square_usual 4mo ago
> Part of the idea behind a moratorium is to allow time for impact analysis so those regulations can be written appropriately. They couldn't do that in 20 years of having data centers?
44.
by square_usual 4mo ago
Sure, put that in the law.
45.
by square_usual 4mo ago
> Local municipalities are having to upgrade municipal infrastructure as a result of these projects Then they could pass a law requiring the data centers to pay for these instead of banning them outright, should sort itself out no?
46.
by square_usual 4mo ago
> It's pretty well documented that datacenters (esp the AI variety) are offloading grid expenses to customers as higher baseline costs. I'm sure you can present this documentation, then.
47.
by square_usual 4mo ago
They literally aren't! they literally say in this article that it's not there yet!!!
48.
by square_usual 4mo ago
How is this a fair analogy? The NYT isn't pissing on your doormat. Making it harder to cancel is an annoyance, but it's not like they don't let you.
49.
by square_usual 4mo ago
I'm sure the engineering teams of every company in the world is just "good enough engineers" and not, you know, regular devs who ship bugs at the same rate that has been now. And I'm sure your personal anecdote of "
50.
by square_usual 4mo ago
I don't understand why people look at bugs and go "oh it must be AI". Did humans never write bugs? I've seen plenty of platforms where bugs like that were the norm, bad software engineering has always existed.
51.
by square_usual 4mo ago
There is no evidence that per-token inference prices (which is what Uber is setting a cap on) is subsidized.
52.
by square_usual 4mo ago
Buried lede: > We have increased rate limits in Claude Code to accommodate the higher token usage of higher effort levels
53.
by square_usual 5mo ago
> For starters, if I'm a "house builder" by trade You're not a house builder, you're a widget maker who needs a house to live in. Auth is almost never your startup's core competency or offering. Spending one
54.
by square_usual 5mo ago
> Ashokan carvings are not historical documents attributed to the historical person of Buddha Yeah, if you assert a document is not a document, sure, you can say whatever you'd like.
55.
by square_usual 5mo ago
> Buddha has virtually no textual documents placed within 900 years of his death First: this isn't true. There are plenty of Ashokan inscriptions from ~150 years after the Buddha's death, and they speak of an already-existing
56.
by square_usual 5mo ago
Not because your tastes are expensive, but because you'll want to do productive work well into that time frame.
57.
by square_usual 5mo ago
You're the fifth person to assume me being against FIRE means you should burn all your money, which is kind of the problem with the mindset!
58.
by square_usual 5mo ago
> that the only two options available are to spend without restraint or live miserably frugal When did I say that? I have a 35% savings rate and still am able to spend happily. The point is that you don't need to aim to retire earl
59.
by square_usual 5mo ago
The point of FIRE isn't that you invest in your future. I think it's unreasonable to say the opposite of FIRE is to save nothing, when it is in fact saving at good rate while aiming to retire in your 60s. My point is that aiming t
60.
by square_usual 5mo ago
> It isn't about saving up for a permanent vacation. It shouldn't even be conceptualized as a "vacation". "Permanent vacation" is permanent time off work, not a holiday. If you're continuing doing what

More ›